How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Kronecker pairing for a cellular circle generator
Example
Assume AC. Give one vertex and one positively oriented one-cell, and let be the corresponding cellular generator transported to singular homology. There is a unique with . More generally for integers .
Facts & Assumptions
Cellular boundary is the incidence degree matrix gives endpoint difference for a one-cell; Cellular homology computes singular homology transports cellular homology to singular homology. Homology of spheres also gives .
Topological universal coefficient short exact sequence for cohomology identifies its right map with evaluation. Its local supplier Singular UCT extension from cycle projections computes Ext using any length-one projective resolution and proves surjectivity by cycle projections. Assume The Axiom of Choice.
The kronecker pairing is independent of cocycle and cycle representatives gives representative independence and biadditivity.
Proof
Given: The oriented circle and AC as in the example.
Both endpoints of the oriented one-cell attach to the same vertex, so its cellular boundary is zero. There are no two-cells. Thus the degree-one cellular homology is the infinite cyclic group on this cell; its image under the isomorphism in [F1] is a singular homology generator. The degree-zero group is likewise . In particular the cellular cell symbol has only been used to specify a homology class, not as a singular cochain.
The length-zero resolution of consisting of augmented by identity has zero degree-one Hom group, so by [F2]. The degree-one UCT therefore makes evaluation an isomorphism. The homomorphism is well-defined because every element has a unique such expression. Define . Then , and injectivity of makes this class unique.
A singular cocycle representing this class can be obtained exactly as in [F2]: for integral singular cycles choose the supplied projection , let be the quotient, and set . On a two-boundary, acts as identity and vanishes, so . On any singular cycle representing , its value is . Thus this actual singular cocycle has the required class and evaluation. The construction does not identify a cellular cochain with a singular cochain.
Biadditivity from [F3] yields , including zero, negative integers and . Reversing the cell orientation replaces by and its uniquely normalized dual by , leaving the normalized value one. The nonempty circle and degree one are fixed; no assertion about a zero-dimensional or empty sphere is involved. AC is inherited from the UCT cycle projection in step 3.1; specifying the single oriented cell adds no infinite choice.
Depends on
- The kronecker pairing is independent of cocycle and cycle representatives
- Topological universal coefficient short exact sequence for cohomology
- Homology of spheres
- The Axiom of Choice
- Cellular boundary is the incidence degree matrix
- Cellular homology computes singular homology
- Singular UCT extension from cycle projections
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Hatcher, section 3.1, evaluation and universal coefficients (standard reference, not scraped)