How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The middle-dimensional intersection form of a closed oriented 4k-manifold
Definition
Let be a closed oriented smooth manifold of dimension , , with orientation and fundamental class determined by (Fundamental class of a compact oriented manifold, Top homology of a connected manifold). The middle-dimensional intersection form of is where is the singular cup product of Singular cohomology ring and is the Kronecker evaluation pairing of Kronecker evaluation pairing, read on the fundamental class. The pairing is well defined: the cup product is defined on cohomology classes and the evaluation on classes is independent of cocycle and cycle representatives by The kronecker pairing is independent of cocycle and cycle representatives. Since and both variables have degree , the product has degree and pairs with the top-degree class ; the coefficient field is , with as the coefficient image.
Integral form. On images of integral classes the formula restricts to the integral pairing on , valued in . The torsion subgroup of lies in the kernel of that integral pairing; this is proved in the symmetry and nondegeneracy lemma following on this page, not assumed here, and it is what lets the real form be controlled by the free quotient.
Geometric identification. For closed oriented embedded submanifolds of complementary dimension , with Poincaré duals of their fundamental classes, one has the geometric intersection number, with the cohomology-first, front-evaluation cap and cup conventions and the geometric factor order fixed by The geometric intersection number is the Poincare-dual cup pairing; no third sign convention is introduced (The cap-product order is fixed by the AT convention, not minted here).
Disconnected and empty manifolds. If is a disjoint union of closed oriented components, the orientation restricts to each component (orientability is componentwise, Every manifold is F2-orientable and orientability is componentwise) and is defined componentwise, on the summands of . For the empty manifold one sets . The form is determined by this displayed formula alone; its symmetry, nondegeneracy and additivity properties are not part of the definition and are proved in the lemma following on this page. The pairing formula itself uses no choice principle. The geometric identification assumes AC (The Axiom of Choice), inherited from its Poincare-duality supplier.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- Singular cohomology ring
- Kronecker evaluation pairing
- The kronecker pairing is independent of cocycle and cycle representatives
- Fundamental class of a compact oriented manifold
- Top homology of a connected manifold
- Every manifold is F2-orientable and orientability is componentwise
- The geometric intersection number is the Poincare-dual cup pairing
- The cap-product order is fixed by the AT convention, not minted here
Used by
- The Euler characteristic does not determine the signature Counterexample
- The signature of a closed oriented manifold of dimension divisible by four Definition
- Multiplicativity of the signature on products of projective spaces Example
- Signature and first Pontryagin number of the complex projective plane Example
- The orientation-reversed projective plane has signature minus one Example
- The signature of the product of two 2-spheres is zero: the hyperbolic intersection form Example
- The boundary middle form is well defined and glues Lemma
- The middle-dimensional intersection form is symmetric and nondegenerate Lemma
- The restriction image on a cobordism boundary is Lagrangian Lemma
- The signature and the L-genus agree on complex projective space Lemma
- The signature is additive under disjoint union and negates under orientation reversal Lemma
- The signature is independent of the diagonalizing basis and unchanged by scalar extension from the rationals to the reals Lemma
- The signature is multiplicative under Cartesian products Theorem
- The signature of an oriented boundary vanishes, so the signature is an oriented cobordism invariant Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
58 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John Milnor and James Stasheff, Characteristic Classes (re-typeset scan; original pagination) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Daniel S. Freed, Bordism: Old and New (lecture notes, UT Austin, Fall 2012) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Tom Weston, An Introduction to Cobordism Theory (lecture notes, Stanford) (standard reference, not scraped)