Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The signature is multiplicative under Cartesian products

Statement

Assume AC. For closed oriented smooth manifolds M4a and N4b, with M×N carrying the product orientation (Product orientations, Products of smooth manifolds have a canonical product smooth structure), σ(M×N)=σ(M) σ(N).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC; closed oriented smooth M4a, N4b, k=a+b, and the product orientation on M×N.

[F2]

Since M,N are closed, their (co)homology is finitely generated, in particular finite free over the field R; the cross product is a ring isomorphism H∗(M;R)⊗^H∗(N;R)→H∗(M×N;R) for the graded tensor multiplication (α⊗β)(α′⊗β′)=(−1)∣β∣∣α′∣(α⌣α′)⊗(β⌣β′) (Cohomological Kunneth cross product is a ring isomorphism, Finite generation from cap with a finite fundamental cycle).

[F3]

The Kronecker pairing is multiplicative under cross products: ⟨α×β,c×d⟩=⟨α,c⟩⟨β,d⟩, and the fundamental class of a product is [M×N]=[M]×[N] (The Kronecker pairing is multiplicative under cross products, The fundamental class of a product is the cross product of the fundamental classes).

[F4]

Over the field R, Poincare duality gives dim⁡RHi(M;R)=dim⁡RH4a−i(M;R) and similarly for N, and the pairings Hi(M)×H4a−i(M)→R and Hj(N)×H4b−j(N)→R are perfect for every i,j (Poincaré duality gives a nonsingular cup pairing).

[F5]

A nondegenerate symmetric form with a totally isotropic subspace of exactly half the dimension has signature zero (A nondegenerate symmetric form with a half-dimensional isotropic subspace has zero signature), and the tensor product of nondegenerate symmetric forms has multiplicative inertia (The tensor product of nondegenerate real symmetric forms has multiplicative signature).

[F6]

The tangent bundle of a product splits canonically as T(M×N)≅TM⊞TN for the product smooth structure (Canonical tangent and cotangent splittings for products, Products of smooth manifolds have a canonical product smooth structure).

Proof

technique · direct; split the middle cohomology of the product by Kunneth and kill the off-middle blocks by the isotropic lemma
1.1givenF2

Kunneth decomposition: by [F2], H2k(M×N;R)=⨁i=02kVi with Vi=Hi(M;R)⊗H2k−i(N;R), and the ring structure is the graded tensor product.

1.2givenF1F2F3

For x⊗y∈Vi and x′⊗y′∈Vj with i+j=4a, the ring formula [F2] and the matching-degree evaluation [F3] give QM×N(x⊗y,x′⊗y′)=(−1)(2k−i)j⟨x⌣x′,[M]⟩⟨y⌣y′,[N]⟩. If i+j≠4a, one factor cup class has degree greater than the dimension of its manifold, so vanishes by [F2]. Thus Vi pairs only with V4a−i; the factors in the displayed formula are complementary-degree cup pairings, rather than middle forms unless i=j=2a.

2.1step 1.2F1

Middle block: taking i=j=2a in step 1.2, the sign is (−1)∣y∣∣x′∣=(−1)2b⋅2a=+1, so QM×N restricted to V2a=H2a(M)⊗H2b(N) is exactly QM⊗QN.

2.2givenF2F4step 1.2

Off-middle part is nondegenerate: by [F4] dim⁡Vi=dim⁡V4a−i for every i, and the pairing of Vi with V4a−i induced by QM×N is the tensor product of the perfect pairings Hi(M)×H4a−i(M)→R and H2k−i(N)×H4b−2k+i(N)→R, hence perfect: in dual bases the tensor pairing matrix is a nonzero scalar times an identity matrix, the scalar being the fixed Koszul sign. Set Vi=0 when i is outside 0,…,2k; if a block has no complementary index in that range it is zero by the dimension bounds in [F2]. Therefore Z=⨁i≠2aVi is nondegenerate: a class in Z pairing to zero with all of Z must have every block component zero, testing against the complementary block.

2.3step 1.2F4

Half-dimensional isotropic subspace: W=⨁i<2aVi⊆Z is totally isotropic by step 1.2, since i,j<2a give i+j<4a and hence vanishing pairing; and 2dim⁡W=dim⁡Z because Z is the direct sum of the pairs Vi⊕V4a−i with i<2a and dim⁡Vi=dim⁡V4a−i by [F4].

3.1step 1.2step 2.1step 2.2step 2.3F1F5

The off-middle blocks contribute nothing: by steps 2.2 and 2.3, Z carries a nondegenerate symmetric form with the half-dimensional totally isotropic subspace W, so sign⁡(QM×N∣Z)=0 by [F5]. Moreover Z⊥V2a by step 1.2, and V2a is nondegenerate because QM×N is nondegenerate and Z is nondegenerate with H2k(M×N;R)=Z⊕V2a; hence the inertia data of QM×N are the sums of those of Q∣Z and Q∣V2a.

4.1step 2.1step 3.1F5F6∎

Therefore σ(M×N)=sign⁡(Q∣Z)+sign⁡(Q∣V2a)=0+sign⁡(QM⊗QN)=σ(M)σ(N), using step 3.1, step 2.1 and the multiplicativity of inertia under tensor products [F5]; the product smooth structure and orientation used are those of [F6] and the statement.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

80 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources