Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The signature is independent of the diagonalizing basis and unchanged by scalar extension from the rationals to the reals

Statement

Assume AC, inherited from finite generation and the coefficient-duality suppliers. Let M be a closed oriented smooth 4k-manifold. (1) Any basis of H2k(M;R) diagonalizing QM has the same number p of positive entries and the same number q of negative entries, and σ(M)=p−q equals the intrinsic inertia difference of QM; in particular the definition The signature of a closed oriented manifold of dimension divisible by four is well posed. (2) With VQ=H2k(M;Q) and VR=VQ⊗QR, the inertia data of QMQ and of QM=QMQ⊗R agree; more generally, scalar extension of a finite-dimensional symmetric bilinear form along an ordered-field extension preserves inertia, so the signatures computed over Q and over R coincide.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC; a closed oriented smooth 4k-manifold M with middle form QM (over R) and its rational counterpart QMQ on H2k(M;Q).

[F1]

QM(x,y)=⟨x⌣y,[M]⟩ on H2k(M;R), and the inertia of a symmetric bilinear form is the triple (p,q,r) of counts of positive, negative and zero diagonal entries in a diagonalizing basis, with signature p−q (The middle-dimensional intersection form of a closed oriented 4k-manifold, Positive and negative definiteness, the inertia (p,q,r), rank p+q, and signature p−q of a real symmetric bilinear or quadratic form).

[F2]

Every symmetric bilinear form on a finite-dimensional real vector space is congruent to exactly one normal form diag⁡(Ip,−Iq,0r), and the counts are independent of the diagonalizing basis (Sylvester's law of inertia: every real symmetric form is congruent to diag⁡(Ip,−Iq,0r), and (p,q,r) is unique).

[F3]

Two symmetric forms of the same finite dimension are congruent exactly when they have the same inertia (Two real symmetric bilinear forms are congruent if and only if they have the same inertia); every symmetric bilinear form over a field of characteristic not two has an orthogonal basis (Every symmetric bilinear form on a finite-dimensional space over a field of characteristic not 2 has an orthogonal basis).

[F4]

If F is a subfield of the ordered field K with the order induced from K (Ordered field, Subfield: a subring of a field closed under inverses of its nonzero elements, and therefore a field with the restricted operations), then for a∈F the sign of a is the same in F and in K, since the positive cone of F is the restriction of that of K; and if e1,…,en is an F-basis of V, then ei⊗1 is a K-basis of V⊗FK, with the same diagonal entries for a diagonal form (The elementary tensors of two bases form the product basis of the tensor product).

[F5]

For a closed oriented 4k-manifold, Hj(M;Z) and Hj(M;Z) are finitely generated, and for a divisible coefficient group F evaluation gives a natural isomorphism H2k(M;F)≅Hom⁡Z(H2k(M;Z),F) (Finite generation from cap with a finite fundamental cycle, Cohomology with a divisible abelian coefficient group is Hom of homology).

[F6]

Every finitely generated abelian group is Zb⊕T with T finite, and for torsion-free F one has Hom⁡Z(T,F)=0 and Hom⁡Z(Zb,F)≅Fb (The fundamental theorem of finitely generated abelian groups from PID modules).

[F7]

The Kronecker pairing evaluates representatives and is natural in the cohomology variable under coefficient homomorphisms u:G→G′: ⟨u∗α,z⟩=u⟨α,z⟩; the cup product is the coefficientwise front/back cochain formula, so it commutes with coefficient change (The kronecker pairing is independent of cocycle and cycle representatives, Kronecker evaluation pairing, Singular cup product on cochains).

[F8]

The fundamental class is the unique class restricting to the prescribed local generator at every point; for the real orientation obtained from the integral one by coefficient change, the image of [M]Z is [M]R, because coefficient change carries the integral local generator to the real one and preserves local restrictions (Fundamental class of a compact oriented manifold).

Proof

technique · direct; scalar extension of a diagonal form, then the coefficient-change bridge via divisible-coefficient duality
1.1givenF3F4algebra

Let B be a symmetric form on a finite-dimensional space over an ordered field F, and let K⊇F carry an extending order. By [F3] choose an orthogonal F-basis with diagonal entries bi. Write V=V+⊕V−⊕V0 for its positive, negative and zero coordinate subspaces, of dimensions p,q,r. The radical is V0. A positive-definite subspace projects injectively to V+: a vector with zero positive coordinates has B(v,v)≤0, so cannot be a nonzero vector in such a subspace. Rank-nullity and the subspace dimension bound (Rank-nullity: dim⁡FV=nullity⁡T+rank⁡T, If dim⁡FV=n and U is a linear subspace of V, then U is finite-dimensional, dim⁡FU≤n, and dim⁡FU=n if and only if U=V) give dimension at most p, attained by V+. Similarly the maximal negative dimension is q. Thus (p,q,r) is intrinsic over any ordered field. By [F4], the extended basis has the same diagonal entries and signs over K, so these intrinsic dimensions, and hence the signature, are preserved.

1.2givenF1F2F3

Basis independence and well-posedness: by [F2] the diagonal entries' sign counts (p,q,r) of any diagonalizing basis of QM are intrinsic to QM, and by [F3] congruent forms have equal inertia, so p, q are the same for every diagonalizing basis; since QM is symmetric and nondegenerate by The middle-dimensional intersection form is symmetric and nondegenerate, r=0 and σ(M)=p−q is the intrinsic inertia difference of QM as claimed in The signature of a closed oriented manifold of dimension divisible by four.

1.3givenF5F6

Coefficient bridge: by [F5] applied with the divisible groups F=Q and F=R, evaluation gives natural isomorphisms H2k(M;Q)≅Hom⁡Z(H2k(M;Z),Q) and H2k(M;R)≅Hom⁡Z(H2k(M;Z),R). Writing H2k(M;Z)=Zb⊕T with T finite by [F6], both groups are Qb and Rb, and the map induced by the coefficient inclusion Q↪R is the natural inclusion Qb↪Rb. Hence the natural map H2k(M;Q)⊗QR→H2k(M;R) is an isomorphism Qb⊗QR≅Rb.

2.1givenF1F7F8

Form compatibility: for x,y∈H2k(M;Q), with images xR,yR under coefficient change, QM(xR,yR)=QMQ(x,y). Indeed the cup product formula is coefficientwise by [F7], so xR⌣yR is the coefficient-change image of x⌣y; the real fundamental class is the coefficient-change image of the integral one by [F8], and the Kronecker pairing is natural in coefficients by [F7]; evaluating the rational cup class on the integral fundamental class gives the rational number QMQ(x,y), whose image in R is the real evaluation. Since the xR span H2k(M;R) over R by step 1.3, the real form is the scalar extension QMQ⊗QR of the rational one.

3.1step 1.1step 1.3step 2.1

Inertia agreement: by step 2.1 the real form QM is the scalar extension of the rational form QMQ along Q⊆R, so step 1.1 gives that their inertia triples agree; in particular the signatures over Q and over R coincide.

4.1step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3step 2.1step 3.1∎

Steps 1.1 and 2.1 prove the basis-independence and well-posedness clause, and steps 1.1, 1.3 and 2.1 prove the scalar-extension clause for M; the general statement for arbitrary finite-dimensional symmetric forms over an ordered field is exactly step 1.1. If the vector space of the form is zero, its diagonal data are empty and its signature is 0. For a zero-manifold the middle group need not vanish; both coefficient fields give its signed point count.

Depends on

Used by

Cited to discharge well-definedness by The signature of a closed oriented manifold of dimension divisible by four.

Dependency tree · two levels

99 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources