How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Singular cup product on cochains
Definition
Let be a space, let be a commutative unital ring, and use the positive coboundary of Singular cochain complex with coefficients. For and cochains , , their cup product is Extend from simplex generators -linearly. The product is -bilinear in the cochains by distributivity and commutativity in . Zero or negative-degree inputs give zero.
With the tensor functional of Additive singular cohomology cross product and from Alexander–Whitney map and diagonal approximation, this is exactly . Indeed only the cut of bidegree survives. Equivalently, define the AW external cochain by and pull it back along the diagonal. There is no extra cochain sign.
The earlier additive cohomology cross product was expressed through a specified shuffle inverse . The comparison with it is an equality of classes: Alexander--Whitney and shuffle are natural chain-homotopy inverses constructs with . For cocycles, The additive singular cohomology cross product is well-defined gives , hence Here postcomposition with the diagonal commutes with boundary, as proved in the diagonal definition. Thus the AW cup class equals diagonal pullback of the earlier external product; equality of the two chosen external cochains is not required. At total degree zero the displayed primitive is zero and the identity is literal. The same tensor-functional identity gives for cocycles, so the compared classes exist.
For degree-zero cochains the formula on a vertex is ordinary multiplication of their values. A constant cochain of value multiplies any cochain on either side without changing it, including on disconnected spaces. On empty or over all cochains and products are zero. Face restrictions make sense for every singular simplex, including degenerate ones. A bare abelian coefficient group has no specified multiplication to insert in this formula. No AC or selection of representatives is used in this definition or comparison.
Depends on
Used by
- Poincaré duality gives a nonsingular cup pairing Corollary
- An additive coefficient group does not determine a cup multiplication Counterexample
- Cochain cup product is not strictly graded commutative Counterexample
- Cap product with cohomology written first Definition
- Relative cup product for an excisive triad Definition
- Integral cohomology ring of a closed orientable surface Example
- De Rham integration respects wedge and cup in cohomology Lemma
- Integral surface cup pairing from the oriented polygon Lemma
- Cap naturality and projection formula Proposition
- Cup product is natural, unital and associative Proposition
- Cohomological Kunneth cross product is a ring isomorphism Theorem
- Cup product Leibniz identity Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Hatcher §3.2, Cup Product; Miller Construction 28.1 (standard reference, not scraped)