Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + claude-opus-5[1m])audited 2026-08-24
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Generation of a finite group is detected modulo its Frattini subgroup

Statement

A subset S of a finite group G generates G if and only if its image generates G/Φ(G) (The Frattini subgroup Φ(G) as the intersection of the maximal subgroups of a finite group).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite group G, its normal subgroup Φ(G) from The Frattini subgroup of a finite group is characteristic, the quotient map π:GG/Φ(G), and a subset SG.

[L1]

For a finite group G, an element x lies in Φ(G) if and only if, for every subset TG, T,x=G implies T=G (The Frattini subgroup consists exactly of the nongenerators of a finite group).

[L2]

For NG, subgroups of G/N correspond inclusion-preservingly to subgroups of G containing N (Correspondence theorem: subgroups of G/N correspond to subgroups of G containing N, with normality preserved).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

If S=G, then applying the quotient map gives π(S)=G/Φ(G).

givenL2
1.2

Conversely, suppose π(S) generates the quotient. Then S,Φ(G)=G. The subgroup Φ(G) is finite, so list its elements and remove them one at a time from this generating set: [L1] says each is a nongenerator. After all have been removed, S=G.

givenL1algebra
2.1

Steps 1.1 and 1.2 prove both implications. When G=1, both the empty subset and its empty quotient image generate, so the boundary case also agrees.

step 1.1step 1.2L2

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources