Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

IID finite-variance weak law

Statement

Let (Xk)k1 be IID square-integrable real random variables, with μ=EX1 and σ2=Var(X1). For Sn=k=1nXk, ESn/nμ2=σ2/n, and Sn/nμ in L2 and in probability. Also P(Sn/nμε)σ2/(nε2) for ε>0.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Identical distribution and IID families: Let (Xi)iI be random elements with the same measurable target (E,E). They are identically distributed if P(XiB)=P(XjB) for all i,jI and BE, that is, their laws in def-law-or-distribution-of-a-random-element agree. They are independent and identically distributed (IID) if, in addition, the whole family is independent in def-independent-random-elements. Independence means mutual independence, not merely pairwise independence. No moment assumption is part of either definition. The empty family satisfies these universal conditions vacuously.

[F2]

Chebyshev weak law for uncorrelated arrays: For each n1, let Xn,1,,Xn,rn be square-integrable real random variables on one probability space, pairwise uncorrelated within the row, where rn0 is finite. Set Sn=k=1rnXn,k and let bn>0 be deterministic. If vn:=bn2k=1rnVar(Xn,k)0, then (SnESn)/bn0 in L2 and in probability. More precisely, its second moment is vn, and its probability of absolute value at least ε>0 is at most vn/ε2. No independence between rows is required.

[F3]

Expectations factor over finite products of independent random variables: Let n1, let X0,,Xn1 be independent real random variables on a common probability space, and let gi:RR be Borel measurable for each i<n. 1. If every gi is nonnegative, then E[i<ngi(Xi)]=i<nE[gi(Xi)] in [0,+]. 2. If every gi(Xi) is integrable, then i<ngi(Xi) is integrable and the same factorization holds in R.

Proof

Given: The objects and hypotheses of the statement.

1.1

IID gives common mean and variance. For distinct indices, factorization of the integrable variables gives E(XiXj)=μ2, hence zero covariance. Thus the first n variables form an uncorrelated row.

F1F3given
2.1

Apply the row result with rn=n and bn=n. Its variance sum is nσ2, so it gives the displayed identity, both convergences, and the probability bound. This calculation holds for n=1 and for σ2=0.

F2step 1.1algebra

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

20 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources