How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The filtration induced on a submodule is equivalent to its intrinsic ideal-adic filtration
Statement
Let be Noetherian, let be an ideal, let be a finite -module, and let be a submodule. Then there exists such that for every ,
Equivalently, the filtration induced from the -adic filtration of and the intrinsic -adic filtration of agree up to a bounded shift.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A Noetherian commutative ring , an ideal , a finite -module , and a submodule .
Artin-Rees gives with
for all (Artin-Rees controls intersections of submodules with high ideal powers).
Proof
For every , one always has , since .
Choose as in [L1]. Then for , because .
Combining the preceding steps gives the two-sided eventual inclusion, hence the two filtrations are equivalent.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Allen B. Altman and Steven L. Kleiman, A Term of Commutative Algebra, Lemma (20.18) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Stacks Project, Section 10.96 (standard reference, not scraped)