How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Adic completion is exact on finite modules over a Noetherian ring
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice.
Let be a Noetherian commutative ring, let be an ideal, and let
be a short exact sequence of finitely generated -modules. Then the induced sequence of -adic completions
is exact.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A Noetherian commutative ring , an ideal , and a short exact sequence of finitely generated -modules.
Countable inverse limits preserve short exact sequences whenever the left system is Mittag-Leffler (Countable Mittag-Leffler systems preserve short exactness on inverse limits).
The -adic completion is the inverse limit of the quotients by the powers of (The -adic completion of a module).
Proof
For each , the given short exact sequence induces an exact sequence The first map is injective because its kernel is , and the second map is surjective because every class in lifts to a class in .
The left inverse system has surjective transition maps, hence is Mittag-Leffler. Indeed, if and , then the class of in is the image of the class of the same in Therefore every transition map is surjective.
Taking inverse limits in the sequences of step 1.1 and using [L1] yields an exact sequence
By [L2], the middle and right inverse limits are and . For the left inverse limit, the induced filtration on is equivalent to the intrinsic -adic filtration by The filtration induced on a submodule is equivalent to its intrinsic ideal-adic filtration, so its completion is .
Substituting these identifications into step 3.1 gives which is the claimed exactness.
Depends on
- The $I$-adic completion of a module
- Countable Mittag-Leffler systems preserve short exactness on inverse limits
- Left and right Noetherian rings
- Artin-Rees controls intersections of submodules with high ideal powers
- The filtration induced on a submodule is equivalent to its intrinsic ideal-adic filtration
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- A. Altman and S. Kleiman, A Term of Commutative Algebra, 13th ed., Theorem 22.17 (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. S. Milne, A Primer of Commutative Algebra, Proposition 24.4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Lemma 10.97.1 (standard reference, not scraped)