Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-01
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Adic completion is exact on finite modules over a Noetherian ring

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice.

Let R be a Noetherian commutative ring, let I⊆R be an ideal, and let 0→M′→M→M′′→0 be a short exact sequence of finitely generated R-modules. Then the induced sequence of I-adic completions 0→M′^→M^→M′′^→0 is exact.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A Noetherian commutative ring R, an ideal I⊆R, and a short exact sequence 0→M′→M→M′′→0 of finitely generated R-modules.

[L1]

Countable inverse limits preserve short exact sequences whenever the left system is Mittag-Leffler (Countable Mittag-Leffler systems preserve short exactness on inverse limits).

[L2]

The I-adic completion is the inverse limit of the quotients by the powers of I (The I-adic completion of a module).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenalgebra

For each n≥0, the given short exact sequence induces an exact sequence 0→M′/(M′∩InM)→M/InM→M′′/InM′′→0. The first map is injective because its kernel is (M′∩InM)/(M′∩InM), and the second map is surjective because every class in M′′/InM′′ lifts to a class in M/InM.

2.1step 1.1algebra

The left inverse system M′/(M′∩InM) has surjective transition maps, hence is Mittag-Leffler. Indeed, if n≥m and x∈M′, then the class of x in M′/(M′∩ImM) is the image of the class of the same x in M′/(M′∩InM). Therefore every transition map M′/(M′∩InM)→M′/(M′∩ImM) is surjective.

3.1L1step 2.1

Taking inverse limits in the sequences of step 1.1 and using [L1] yields an exact sequence 0→lim←⁡M′/(M′∩InM)→lim←⁡M/InM→lim←⁡M′′/InM′′→0.

4.1L2step 3.1

By [L2], the middle and right inverse limits are M^ and M′′^. For the left inverse limit, the induced filtration M′∩InM on M′ is equivalent to the intrinsic I-adic filtration InM′ by The filtration induced on a submodule is equivalent to its intrinsic ideal-adic filtration, so its completion is M′^.

5.1step 4.1∎

Substituting these identifications into step 3.1 gives 0→M′^→M^→M′′^→0, which is the claimed exactness.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources