How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Countable Mittag-Leffler systems preserve short exactness on inverse limits
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice.
Let
be a short exact sequence of inverse systems of -modules indexed by . If is Mittag-Leffler, then
is exact.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A short exact sequence of inverse systems with Mittag-Leffler.
Inverse limits are left exact (Inverse limits preserve kernels).
The Mittag-Leffler condition means that for each fixed stage , the images of the transition maps into eventually stabilize (Mittag-Leffler inverse systems).
Proof
By [L1], the sequence of inverse limits is already exact at and at . It remains to prove surjectivity of
Let . For each , set Since is surjective, each is nonempty. Compatibility of the inverse system and of the family makes every transition map restrict to a map .
The system is Mittag-Leffler as a system of sets. Fix . By [L2] choose such that For the inclusion is automatic. For the reverse inclusion, take and choose mapping to . Choose any . The images of and in are both , so their difference lies in . By the stabilization choice there is whose image in equals the image of . Then lies in and maps to in . Hence the images stabilize.
For each , let Because is Mittag-Leffler and nonempty, is equal to one stable image and is therefore nonempty. The restricted maps are surjective: if , then comes from some sufficiently high stage with , and the image of that same element in lies in and maps to .
By the Axiom of Choice, choose , and after has been chosen choose mapping to ; this is possible by surjectivity from step 2.1. Then is an element of , hence of , and by construction it maps to .
Therefore is surjective. Combined with step 1.1, this proves exactness of
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- A. Altman and S. Kleiman, A Term of Commutative Algebra, 13th ed., Lemma 22.7 (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Lemma 10.86.4 (standard reference, not scraped)