Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-01
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Elements congruent to 1 modulo a defining ideal are units

Statement

Let R be a commutative ring and let I⊆R be an ideal. Assume that R is I-adically complete. If u∈R satisfies u≡1(modI), then u is a unit of R.

Consequently, every element of I lies in the Jacobson radical of R.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A commutative ring R, an ideal I⊆R, and an I-adically complete ring element u=1−a with a∈I.

[L1]

The completion map R→lim←⁡R/In is an isomorphism because R is I-adically complete (Separated and complete filtered modules, The I-adic completion of a module).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenalgebra

For each n≥1, the finite geometric sum vn:=1+a+a2+⋯+an−1 satisfies (1−a)vn=1−an. Since a∈I, one has an∈In, so the image of vn in R/In is an inverse to the image of u=1−a.

2.1step 1.1construct

The residue classes (vn mod In)n are compatible: the image of vn+1 in R/In equals the image of vn because vn+1−vn=an∈In. Therefore they define an element v∈lim←⁡R/In.

3.1L1step 2.1algebra

By [L1], there is a unique element w∈R corresponding to v. Since each component of v is an inverse to the image of u, the products uw and wu map to 1 in every quotient R/In. Completeness includes separatedness, so the kernel of R→lim←⁡R/In is 0; hence uw=wu=1. Thus u is a unit.

4.1step 3.1algebra∎

Let x∈I and r∈R. Then 1−rx≡1(modI), so step 3.1 shows 1−rx is a unit. The elementary ideal characterization of the Jacobson radical now gives x∈J(R): if a maximal ideal omitted x, its image would generate the residue field, contradicting invertibility of every 1−rx. Therefore I⊆J(R).

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources