Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-04
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Complete separated adic pairs are Henselian

Statement

Let A be a commutative ring and let I⊆A be an ideal. If A is I-adically complete and separated, then (A,I) is a Henselian pair.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A commutative ring A that is I-adically complete and separated.

[L1]

In an I-adically complete ring, every element congruent to 1 modulo I is a unit (Elements congruent to 1 modulo a defining ideal are units).

[L2]

Coprime residue factors admit a lifted Bezout identity modulo I (Lift a Bezout identity for coprime residue factors).

[L3]

One Hensel correction step improves a factorization from modulo Ir to modulo Ir+1 (One correction step raises factor lifting by one ideal power).

[L4]

The correction sequence is coefficientwise Cauchy and its coefficientwise limit multiplies back to the original polynomial (Successive Hensel corrections are Cauchy, The coefficientwise limits multiply back to the original polynomial).

[L5]

Two such lifts agree modulo every power of I (Two lifted factorisations agree modulo every ideal power).

[L6]

A Henselian pair is exactly a pair satisfying the Jacobson-radical clause and the unique coprime factor-lifting clause (Henselian pairs and Henselian local rings).

Proof

technique · iterate the correction lemma and pass to the limit
1.1L1givenalgebra

Let x∈I and r∈A. Then rx∈I, so 1−rx≡1(modI). By [L1], the element 1−rx is a unit. This is the Jacobson-radical criterion for x, so x∈J(A). Hence I⊆J(A).

1.2L2L3givenchooseinduction

Let f∈A[T] be monic and let f‾=g0h0 be a coprime monic factorization in (A/I)[T]. Choose monic lifts g1,h1 of g0,h0. By [L2], choose a,b∈A[T] with ag1+bh1≡1(modI). Repeatedly applying [L3] produces monic pairs (gr,hr) with f−grhr∈Ir[T] for every r≥1.

2.1L4step 1.2

By [L4], the coefficient sequences of (gr) and (hr) are Cauchy and converge to monic polynomials g,h∈A[T] with f=gh. Their reductions are still g0,h0. Thus the required lifted factorization exists.

3.1L5step 2.1given

If f=g′h′ is another monic lift of the same residue factorization, then [L5] gives g≡g′(modIr[T]) and h≡h′(modIr[T]) for every r≥1. Separatedness forces g=g′ and h=h′. Hence the lift is unique.

4.1L6step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1∎

Steps 1.1-3.1 verify both clauses of the definition, so (A,I) is a Henselian pair.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources