How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Lift a Bezout identity for coprime residue factors
Statement
Let be a commutative ring, let be an ideal, and let generate the unit ideal. If lift , then there exist polynomials such that
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A commutative ring , an ideal , residue polynomials with , and lifts .
The quotient ring and the polynomial ring over a commutative ring are again commutative rings, so Bezout identities and coefficientwise lifting make sense in and (The quotient ring with , The polynomial ring over a commutative ring as finitely supported coefficient sequences with convolution).
Proof
Because in , there exist such that
Lift the coefficients of and to polynomials . Reducing coefficientwise modulo gives Hence .
Thus a coprime residue factorization always admits a lifted Bezout relation modulo .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Allen B. Altman and Steven L. Kleiman, A Term of Commutative Algebra, 13th ed., Chapter 22 (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Section 15.11: Henselian pairs (standard reference, not scraped)