How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A coprime factorisation lifted modulo three successive powers
Example
Over , consider Modulo one has and the two residue factors are coprime.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The polynomial over with residue factorization .
Coprime residue factors admit a lifted Bezout identity (Lift a Bezout identity for coprime residue factors).
One Hensel correction step raises the factorization by one power of the ideal (One correction step raises factor lifting by one ideal power).
Verification
Start with and . Then . A residue Bezout identity is so [L1] applies.
Choose constant corrections and . Then so satisfies This is the first explicit correction step from [L2].
Now . Choose and . Then so satisfies
Thus the factorization is lifted explicitly modulo , modulo , and modulo . The computation makes the abstract correction lemma concrete.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Melvin Hochster, The structure theory of complete local rings (standard reference, not scraped)