How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
, , and in particular
Statement
For ,
For every integer ,
and in particular . Moreover, .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: and an integer exponent .
for positive (The integral logarithm satisfies for all positive and ).
is strictly increasing on (The integral logarithm is continuous and strictly increasing on ).
Natural powers are defined recursively by and ; negative integer powers are reciprocal positive powers (Integer powers ).
A property holding at and inherited from to holds for every natural number (The principle of mathematical induction).
Proof
Setting both inputs equal to in [L1] gives , hence . Applying [L1] to then gives .
For natural , the identity holds at because and . If it holds at , then
Since and , strict increase gives .
Induction [L3] proves the power identity for every natural exponent.
If , write with . Then , so steps 1.1 and 3.1 give . Thus the formula holds for every integer.
Substitute in step 4.1, together with the natural and zero cases, to obtain for every integer .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 61 results over 22 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- OpenStax, Calculus Volume 1, Section 6.7 (standard reference, not scraped)