How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Integral Logarithm and the Equivalence of Its Characterisations
1 · Prerequisites
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Countability and Uncountability
- Equivalent Forms of Completeness
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Metric Spaces
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Suprema and Infima
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Exponential Function
- The Logarithm and General Powers
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topology of ℝ
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
The oriented Riemann integral, its additivity, the first fundamental theorem of calculus, the mean value theorem, and the intermediate value theorem provide the calculus background. The declared dependency the-logarithm-and-general-powers supplies the already-published exponential, natural logarithm, their laws, the Mercator series, and the Landau root limit, but those results enter only after the independent integral construction has been completed.
The function is developed from its definition through its derivative, product law, unboundedness, and bijectivity. Its inverse solves the normalised differential equation and is then identified with the published exponential by one uniqueness theorem, which identifies with the natural logarithm. Continuous and differentiable functional equations, a global continuation of the Mercator series, and the Landau limit then assemble into an equivalence theorem with an explicit non-circularity roadmap.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
The integral logarithm for
Definition
For , define the integral logarithm
using the oriented integral when (The integral with oriented limits: and ).
This is well defined. The function is continuous wherever by the quotient clause of Sums, scalar multiples, products, absolute values, maxima, minima and quotients with nonvanishing denominator of continuous functions are continuous, as are constants, the identity and every polynomial function. For it is therefore continuous on the nondegenerate compact interval with endpoints and , hence Riemann integrable there by A continuous function on is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion, whose hypothesis is . At the interval is degenerate and that theorem does not apply; there The integral with oriented limits: and stipulates , so directly.
The integral logarithm satisfies for and
Statement
For every ,
and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: and as defined.
for (The integral logarithm for ).
If an integrand is Riemann integrable on a compact interval and continuous at , then its integral function with fixed lower endpoint has derivative equal to the integrand at (The first fundamental theorem: if is integrable on and continuous at , then ; in particular a continuous has as a primitive).
Oriented integrals satisfy (For : is integrable on if and only if it is integrable on and on , and then ; with the oriented form for arbitrary ).
An oriented integral reverses sign when its endpoints are reversed and is when the endpoints agree (The integral with oriented limits: and ).
Proof
Choose with . For every , additivity gives
By [F1] and the equal-endpoint convention [F2], .
The first term in step 1.1 is constant in . Since is continuous at , [L1] gives .
Since was arbitrary, steps 2.1 and 1.2 prove both claims.
The integral logarithm is continuous and strictly increasing on
Statement
The function is continuous and strictly increasing.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: on .
is differentiable and for (The integral logarithm satisfies for and ).
Differentiability at a point implies continuity there (A function differentiable at is continuous at ).
If a function is continuous on and differentiable on , then for some (The mean value theorem, as the case of Cauchy's: for continuous on with and differentiable on there is with ).
Proof
By [L1] and [L2], is continuous at every point of .
Let . Applying [L3] gives a such that
Hence whenever , so is strictly increasing; step 1.1 supplies continuity.
The integral logarithm satisfies for all positive and
Statement
For all ,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , with ranging over .
for , and (The integral logarithm satisfies for and ).
If is differentiable at and at , then (The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if is differentiable at and is differentiable at , then is differentiable at with ).
A continuous function on an order-convex interval whose derivative vanishes throughout the interior is constant (A function continuous on an interval whose derivative vanishes at every interior point of is constant on ; consequently two such functions with the same derivative differ by a constant).
A differentiable function is continuous (A function differentiable at is continuous at ).
Sums, differences and scalar multiples of functions differentiable at a point are differentiable there, with the corresponding derivatives (Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when ).
Proof
Define on . By [L1] and [L2] each term is differentiable, so [L5] makes differentiable with
By [L4], is continuous, so [L3] makes it constant on .
Evaluating at gives . Therefore , which is the claimed product law.
, , and in particular
Statement
For ,
For every integer ,
and in particular . Moreover, .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: and an integer exponent .
for positive (The integral logarithm satisfies for all positive and ).
is strictly increasing on (The integral logarithm is continuous and strictly increasing on ).
Natural powers are defined recursively by and ; negative integer powers are reciprocal positive powers (Integer powers ).
A property holding at and inherited from to holds for every natural number (The principle of mathematical induction).
Proof
Setting both inputs equal to in [L1] gives , hence . Applying [L1] to then gives .
For natural , the identity holds at because and . If it holds at , then
Since and , strict increase gives .
Induction [L3] proves the power identity for every natural exponent.
If , write with . Then , so steps 1.1 and 3.1 give . Thus the formula holds for every integer.
Substitute in step 4.1, together with the natural and zero cases, to obtain for every integer .
The integral logarithm is unbounded above and below
Statement
For every there are such that
In particular, is unbounded both below and above.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: .
and, for every natural , and (, , and in particular ).
For every real , there is a natural number with (Every complete ordered field is Archimedean).
Proof
If , take ; then . If , apply [L2] to and choose with , so .
If , take ; then . If , apply [L2] to and choose with , so .
Set and . By [L1] and steps 1.1 and 1.2, , and both and are positive.
is a continuous strictly increasing bijection
Statement
The function
is a continuous strictly increasing bijection.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: on and a target .
is continuous and strictly increasing on (The integral logarithm is continuous and strictly increasing on ).
For every real , there are positive with (The integral logarithm is unbounded above and below).
A continuous real function on takes every value between its endpoint values (Intermediate value theorem, by bisection with a canonical left-half rule: a continuous function on takes every value between and ).
Proof
Strict increase in [L1] makes injective.
By [L2], choose positive with . Strict increase in [L1] then implies .
The restriction of to is continuous by [L1], so [L3] gives with . Thus is surjective onto .
Steps 1.1 and 2.1 show that is a bijection, and continuity and strict increase are already supplied by [L1].
The integral exponential as the inverse of
Definition
Because
is a bijection ( is a continuous strictly increasing bijection), it has an inverse function in the sense of Injection, surjection, bijection. Define the integral exponential
Thus, for and ,
The inverse satisfies
Statement
For all ,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: .
, so , and is injective (The integral exponential as the inverse of ).
for positive (The integral logarithm satisfies for all positive and ).
Proof
Since , the product law gives
Also . Injectivity of therefore gives .
The inverse is differentiable, , and
Statement
The inverse function is differentiable and
Facts & Assumptions
Given: .
, , and (The integral exponential as the inverse of ).
for , and (The integral logarithm satisfies for and ).
If a continuous injective function on a nondegenerate interval has a nonzero derivative at , then its inverse is differentiable at with derivative (Derivative of an inverse: if is continuous and injective on a nondegenerate interval and differentiable at with , then the inverse is differentiable at with ; and if then is not differentiable at ).
A differentiable function is continuous (A function differentiable at is continuous at ).
Proof
The function is injective because it has inverse , and it is continuous by [L1] and [L3]. At its derivative is .
Since , the inverse identity gives .
Apply [L2] at . Since ,
The arbitrary choice of , together with steps 2.1 and 1.2, proves all claims.
The integral exponential is the published exponential function
Statement
For every ,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The integral exponential constructed above.
The function is differentiable, satisfies , and has (The inverse is differentiable, , and ).
Every differentiable satisfying and equals the published exponential function (The exponential is the unique solution of with ).
Proof
By [L1], the function is differentiable, satisfies , and has .
The uniqueness theorem [L2] therefore gives for every real .
The integral logarithm is the published natural logarithm
Statement
For every ,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: .
The natural logarithm is the inverse of the bijection (The natural logarithm as the inverse of the exponential function).
Proof
By [F1] and [L1], is an inverse of .
Inverse functions are unique, so [F2] and step 1.1 give for every .
The number is the unique satisfying
Statement
The number is the unique such that
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The published number and the integral function .
is strictly increasing on (The integral logarithm is continuous and strictly increasing on ).
Proof
By [F1] and [L1], . The inverse identity [F2] gives .
Strict increase [L2] makes injective. Hence if also satisfies , then .
The defining integral for converts steps 1.1 and 2.1 into the stated existence and uniqueness claim.
is the unique continuous with and
Statement
The natural logarithm is the unique continuous function satisfying
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A continuous satisfying the displayed functional equation and normalisation.
is differentiable (The inverse is differentiable, , and ), hence continuous (A function differentiable at is continuous at ).
A composite of continuous functions is continuous (A composite of continuous functions is continuous, with no side hypothesis of the kind the composition of limits needs).
The natural logarithm is continuous and satisfies (Order, continuity, range, and the product, quotient, and reciprocal laws for the natural logarithm).
Proof
Define by . The addition law and the equation for give .
The function is continuous by [L2], so is continuous by [L3] and the assumed continuity of .
Conversely, [L7] says that the natural logarithm is continuous and has the required equation. Moreover, [L5] gives , so [F1] and [L6] give . Thus it also has the required normalisation.
By [L4], for some .
From [L5], , so . Hence .
For , [F1] gives , so by [L6].
Steps 4.1 and 1.3 prove existence and uniqueness.
is the unique with that is differentiable at with
Statement
The natural logarithm is the unique function satisfying
that is differentiable at with .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A function satisfying the displayed equation, differentiable at , with .
The derivative is the limit of the difference quotient (The derivative of at a point that is a limit point of , and differentiability on a set).
A differentiable function is continuous (A function differentiable at is continuous at ).
A continuous function on an interval with zero derivative is constant (A function continuous on an interval whose derivative vanishes at every interior point of is constant on ; consequently two such functions with the same derivative differ by a constant).
Sums, differences and scalar multiples of functions differentiable at a point are differentiable there, with the corresponding derivatives (Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when ).
Proof
Setting in the functional equation gives , hence .
Conversely, [L2] and [L5] give the product equation for , while [L1] and [L5] give differentiability at with derivative .
Fix . For sufficiently close to , , and the functional equation gives
For , divide step 2.1 by : As , [F1] and show that .
Both and are differentiable on , so [L6] makes differentiable, and step 3.1 with [L1] gives . By [L3], is continuous, so [L4] makes it constant.
At , step 1.1 and [L1] give , so step 4.1 yields by [L5].
Steps 5.1 and 1.2 prove existence and uniqueness.
Every continuous with is for a unique , including
Statement
If is continuous and for all , then there is a unique such that
Here gives the zero function.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A continuous satisfying the product-to-sum equation.
is differentiable (The inverse is differentiable, , and ), so it is continuous (A function differentiable at is continuous at ).
Composites of continuous functions are continuous (A composite of continuous functions is continuous, with no side hypothesis of the kind the composition of limits needs).
For , , one defines (The logarithm to a positive base other than one).
The natural logarithm is continuous and satisfies (Order, continuity, range, and the product, quotient, and reciprocal laws for the natural logarithm).
Proof
Put . By [F1] and the functional equation, is additive. By [L1], [L2], and continuity of , it is continuous.
Conversely, [L5] shows that each function is continuous and satisfies the product-to-sum equation. For this is the zero function.
If , put . Then and , so ; [F2] gives . Thus the nonzero members are exactly the constant-multiple forms underlying logarithms to bases, while the zero member requires no division.
By [L3], for a unique scalar .
For , , so . By [L4], , hence , which also proves uniqueness.
Steps 3.1, 1.2, and 1.3 prove the classification and its endpoint case.
The Mercator series, its value at and the product law determine on all positive reals, while the series alone is only local
Statement
There is exactly one function such that
and
That function is the natural logarithm. The series condition itself is local; the product law is the continuation rule.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A function satisfying the two displayed conditions.
For , ([The power series for log(1+x) on (-1,1], including the Abel endpoint](/item/thm-log-one-plus-x-power-series)).
The natural logarithm satisfies (Order, continuity, range, and the product, quotient, and reciprocal laws for the natural logarithm).
For every real , there is a natural with (Every complete ordered field is Archimedean).
Natural powers satisfy and (Integer powers ).
The induction principle proves a property for every natural once the base and successor steps are established (The principle of mathematical induction).
Proof
The published natural logarithm satisfies the local series condition by [L1] and the product law by [L2], so an extension exists.
From [F1], induction gives for every natural : equality holds at , and .
Repeated use of the product law, justified by induction, gives , and the series condition at determines .
Given , use [L3] to choose with . Then by step 1.2. Put and ; thus and .
Since , the product law and the local series condition force
Formula 3.1 forces the value of any extension at every , so at most one extension exists. Together with step 1.1, that unique extension is .
Five characterisations of the natural logarithm are equivalent: inverse exponential, integral, continued Mercator series, Landau root limit and the normalised functional equation
Statement
The following five descriptions define the same function on :
- the inverse of the published exponential function;
- ;
- the unique product-to-sum function whose values on for are the Mercator series;
- ;
- the unique continuous product-to-sum function satisfying .
Each is the natural logarithm.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The five descriptions listed in the statement.
The natural logarithm is defined as the inverse of the exponential function (The natural logarithm as the inverse of the exponential function).
The natural logarithm satisfies and (The natural logarithm has derivative 1/x and equals the integral from 1 to x of 1/t).
The independently constructed integral function satisfies (The integral logarithm is the published natural logarithm).
The Mercator formula holds for ([The power series for log(1+x) on (-1,1], including the Abel endpoint](/item/thm-log-one-plus-x-power-series)), and exactly one product-law extension of those values exists, namely (The Mercator series, its value at and the product law determine on all positive reals, while the series alone is only local).
The natural logarithm is the unique continuous product-to-sum function with ( is the unique continuous with and ).
Proof
Description 1 is the natural logarithm by [F1].
Description 2 is the natural logarithm by the exact integral identity [L1], equivalently by the independently proved identification [L2].
Description 3 first uses [L3]'s local series formula and then its product-law continuation theorem, which gives exactly the natural logarithm on the full positive domain.
Description 4 equals the natural logarithm pointwise by [L4].
Description 5 exists and is uniquely the natural logarithm by [L5].
Since each description gives the same function , all five characterisations are equivalent. The third description includes its continuation rule; it does not assert convergence of the original series with for every positive .
Roadmap and non-circularity of the logarithm characterisations
Remark
The implication order is one-way until the bridge. The integral function is defined and proved differentiable, multiplicative-to-additive, unbounded, and bijective without using the published exponential or natural logarithm. Its inverse is then proved to satisfy and . Only at that point does IVP uniqueness identify with the published exponential; taking inverses identifies with the published natural logarithm.
After the bridge, Five characterisations of the natural logarithm are equivalent: inverse exponential, integral, continued Mercator series, Landau root limit and the normalised functional equation compares already proved descriptions: inverse exponential, the integral, the continued Mercator series, the Landau limit, and the regular functional equation. This does not use one description to establish a premise needed earlier in the chain. It is the inverse-function counterpart of the separate exponential roadmap in The power-series, product-limit, IVP, functional-equation, and Picard definitions agree.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
None yet.
Sources
Standard references
Recommended treatments; not extraction sources.