Alphabeta Math
Session-authored (Fable 5 assisted)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

16 results · all verified · 0 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 16 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

The Integral Logarithm and the Equivalence of Its Characterisations

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

The oriented Riemann integral, its additivity, the first fundamental theorem of calculus, the mean value theorem, and the intermediate value theorem provide the calculus background. The declared dependency the-logarithm-and-general-powers supplies the already-published exponential, natural logarithm, their laws, the Mercator series, and the Landau root limit, but those results enter only after the independent integral construction has been completed.

The function L(x)=1xdt/t is developed from its definition through its derivative, product law, unboundedness, and bijectivity. Its inverse E solves the normalised differential equation and is then identified with the published exponential by one uniqueness theorem, which identifies L with the natural logarithm. Continuous and differentiable functional equations, a global continuation of the Mercator series, and the Landau limit then assemble into an equivalence theorem with an explicit non-circularity roadmap.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicableaudited 2026-08-13Open item page →

The integral logarithm L(x):=1xdtt for x>0

Definition

For x>0, define the integral logarithm

L(x):=1xdtt,

using the oriented integral when x<1 (The integral with oriented limits: aaf:=0 and baf:=abf).

This is well defined. The function t1/t is continuous wherever t0 by the quotient clause of Sums, scalar multiples, products, absolute values, maxima, minima and quotients with nonvanishing denominator of continuous functions are continuous, as are constants, the identity and every polynomial function. For x1 it is therefore continuous on the nondegenerate compact interval with endpoints 1 and x, hence Riemann integrable there by A continuous function on [a,b] is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion, whose hypothesis is a<b. At x=1 the interval is degenerate and that theorem does not apply; there The integral with oriented limits: aaf:=0 and baf:=abf stipulates 11f=0, so L(1)=0 directly.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-13Open item page →

The integral logarithm satisfies L(x)=1/x for x>0 and L(1)=0

Statement

For every x>0,

L(x)=1x,

and L(1)=0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: x>0 and L as defined.

[F1]

L(z)=1zdt/t for z>0 (The integral logarithm L(x):=1xdtt for x>0).

[L1]

If an integrand is Riemann integrable on a compact interval and continuous at c, then its integral function with fixed lower endpoint has derivative equal to the integrand at c (The first fundamental theorem: if f is integrable on [a,b] and continuous at c, then F(c)=f(c); in particular a continuous f has F as a primitive).

[F2]

An oriented integral reverses sign when its endpoints are reversed and is 0 when the endpoints agree (The integral with oriented limits: aaf:=0 and baf:=abf).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Choose a,b with 0<a<x<b. For every z(a,b), additivity gives L(z)=1adtt+azdtt.

F1L2
1.2

By [F1] and the equal-endpoint convention [F2], L(1)=11dt/t=0.

F1F2
2.1

The first term in step 1.1 is constant in z. Since 1/t is continuous at x, [L1] gives L(x)=1/x.

step 1.1L1algebra
3.1

Since x>0 was arbitrary, steps 2.1 and 1.2 prove both claims.

step 2.1step 1.2
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-13Open item page →

The integral logarithm is continuous and strictly increasing on (0,)

Statement

The function L:(0,)R is continuous and strictly increasing.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: L on (0,).

[L1]

L is differentiable and L(x)=1/x for x>0 (The integral logarithm satisfies L(x)=1/x for x>0 and L(1)=0).

[L2]

Differentiability at a point implies continuity there (A function differentiable at c is continuous at c).

[L3]

If a function is continuous on [a,b] and differentiable on (a,b), then f(b)f(a)=f(c)(ba) for some c(a,b) (The mean value theorem, as the case g(x)=x of Cauchy's: for f continuous on [a,b] with a<b and differentiable on (a,b) there is c(a,b) with f(b)f(a)=f(c)(ba)).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

By [L1] and [L2], L is continuous at every point of (0,).

L1L2
1.2

Let 0<a<b. Applying [L3] gives a c(a,b) such that L(b)L(a)=L(c)(ba)=bac>0.

L1L3algebra
2.1

Hence L(a)<L(b) whenever 0<a<b, so L is strictly increasing; step 1.1 supplies continuity.

step 1.1step 1.2
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-13Open item page →

The integral logarithm satisfies L(xy)=L(x)+L(y) for all positive x and y

Statement

For all x,y>0,

L(xy)=L(x)+L(y).

Facts & Assumptions

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Define h(x):=L(xy)L(x) on (0,). By [L1] and [L2] each term is differentiable, so [L5] makes h differentiable with h(x)=yxy1x=0.

L1L2L5algebra
2.1

By [L4], h is continuous, so [L3] makes it constant on (0,).

step 1.1L4L3
3.1

Evaluating at x=1 gives h(x)=h(1)=L(y)L(1)=L(y). Therefore L(xy)L(x)=L(y), which is the claimed product law.

step 2.1L1algebra
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-13Open item page →

L(1/x)=L(x), L(xn)=nL(x), and in particular L(2n)=nL(2)

Statement

For x>0,

L(1/x)=L(x).

For every integer m,

L(xm)=mL(x),

and in particular L(2m)=mL(2). Moreover, L(2)>0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: x>0 and an integer exponent m.

[F1]

Natural powers are defined recursively by x0=1 and xn+1=xnx; negative integer powers are reciprocal positive powers (Integer powers am).

[L3]

A property holding at 0 and inherited from n to n+1 holds for every natural number (The principle of mathematical induction).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Setting both inputs equal to 1 in [L1] gives L(1)=2L(1), hence L(1)=0. Applying [L1] to x(1/x)=1 then gives L(1/x)=L(x).

L1algebra
2.1

For natural n, the identity L(xn)=nL(x) holds at n=0 because x0=1 and L(1)=0. If it holds at n, then L(xn+1)=L(xnx)=L(xn)+L(x)=(n+1)L(x).

step 1.1F1L1algebra
2.2

Since 2>1 and L(1)=0, strict increase gives L(2)>0.

step 1.1L2algebra
3.1

Induction [L3] proves the power identity for every natural exponent.

step 2.1L3
4.1

If m<0, write m=n with n>0. Then xm=1/xn, so steps 1.1 and 3.1 give L(xm)=L(xn)=nL(x)=mL(x). Thus the formula holds for every integer.

F1step 1.1step 3.1algebra
5.1

Substitute x=2 in step 4.1, together with the natural and zero cases, to obtain L(2m)=mL(2) for every integer m.

step 3.1step 4.1step 2.2
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-13Open item page →

The integral logarithm is unbounded above and below

Statement

For every MR there are a,b>0 such that

L(a)<M<L(b).

In particular, L is unbounded both below and above.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: MR.

[L1]

L(2)>0 and, for every natural n, L(2n)=nL(2) and L(2n)=nL(2) (L(1/x)=L(x), L(xn)=nL(x), and in particular L(2n)=nL(2)).

[L2]

For every real r, there is a natural number n1 with r<n (Every complete ordered field is Archimedean).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

If M<0, take n=1; then nL(2)>0>M. If M0, apply [L2] to M/L(2) and choose n1 with M/L(2)<n, so M<nL(2).

L1L2algebra
1.2

If M>0, take m=1; then mL(2)<0<M. If M0, apply [L2] to (M)/L(2) and choose m1 with (M)/L(2)<m, so mL(2)<M.

L1L2algebra
2.1

Set b=2n and a=2m. By [L1] and steps 1.1 and 1.2, L(a)<M<L(b), and both a and b are positive.

step 1.1step 1.2L1algebra
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-13Open item page →

L:(0,)R is a continuous strictly increasing bijection

Statement

The function

L:(0,)R

is a continuous strictly increasing bijection.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: L on (0,) and a target rR.

[L1]

L is continuous and strictly increasing on (0,) (The integral logarithm is continuous and strictly increasing on (0,)).

[L2]

For every real r, there are positive a,b with L(a)<r<L(b) (The integral logarithm is unbounded above and below).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Strict increase in [L1] makes L injective.

L1
1.2

By [L2], choose positive a,b with L(a)<r<L(b). Strict increase in [L1] then implies a<b.

L2L1
2.1

The restriction of L to [a,b] is continuous by [L1], so [L3] gives x(a,b) with L(x)=r. Thus L is surjective onto R.

step 1.2L1L3
3.1

Steps 1.1 and 2.1 show that L is a bijection, and continuity and strict increase are already supplied by [L1].

step 1.1step 2.1L1
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicableaudited 2026-08-13Open item page →

The integral exponential E:R(0,) as the inverse of L

Definition

Because

L:(0,)R

is a bijection (L:(0,)R is a continuous strictly increasing bijection), it has an inverse function in the sense of Injection, surjection, bijection. Define the integral exponential

E:R(0,),E:=L1.

Thus, for x>0 and yR,

E(L(x))=x,L(E(y))=y.

CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-13Open item page →

The inverse E satisfies E(a+b)=E(a)E(b)

Statement

For all a,bR,

E(a+b)=E(a)E(b).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: a,bR.

[F1]

E=L1, so L(E(y))=y, and L is injective (The integral exponential E:R(0,) as the inverse of L).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Since E(a),E(b)>0, the product law gives L(E(a)E(b))=L(E(a))+L(E(b))=a+b.

F1L1
2.1

Also L(E(a+b))=a+b. Injectivity of L therefore gives E(a+b)=E(a)E(b).

F1step 1.1
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-13Open item page →

The inverse E is differentiable, E=E, and E(0)=1

Statement

The inverse function E:R(0,) is differentiable and

E(y)=E(y)(yR),E(0)=1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: yR.

[F1]

E=L1, L(E(y))=y, and E(L(x))=x (The integral exponential E:R(0,) as the inverse of L).

[L1]
[L3]

A differentiable function is continuous (A function differentiable at c is continuous at c).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

The function L is injective because it has inverse E, and it is continuous by [L1] and [L3]. At c=E(y)>0 its derivative is L(c)=1/c0.

F1L1L3
1.2

Since L(1)=0, the inverse identity gives E(0)=1.

L1F1
2.1

Apply [L2] at c=E(y). Since L(c)=y, E(y)=1L(E(y))=E(y).

step 1.1L2L1F1algebra
3.1

The arbitrary choice of y, together with steps 2.1 and 1.2, proves all claims.

step 2.1step 1.2
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-13Open item page →

The integral exponential E is the published exponential function

Statement

For every xR,

E(x)=exp(x).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The integral exponential E constructed above.

[L1]

The function E:RR is differentiable, satisfies E=E, and has E(0)=1 (The inverse E is differentiable, E=E, and E(0)=1).

[L2]

Every differentiable y:RR satisfying y=y and y(0)=1 equals the published exponential function (The exponential is the unique solution of y=y with y(0)=1).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

By [L1], the function E is differentiable, satisfies E=E, and has E(0)=1.

L1
2.1

The uniqueness theorem [L2] therefore gives E(x)=exp(x) for every real x.

step 1.1L2
CorollaryStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-13Open item page →

The integral logarithm L is the published natural logarithm

Statement

For every x>0,

L(x)=logx.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: x>0.

[F2]

The natural logarithm is the inverse of the bijection exp:R(0,) (The natural logarithm as the inverse of the exponential function).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

By [F1] and [L1], L is an inverse of exp.

F1L1
2.1

Inverse functions are unique, so [F2] and step 1.1 give L(x)=logx for every x>0.

step 1.1F2
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-13Open item page →

The number e is the unique x>0 satisfying 1xdtt=1

Statement

The number e is the unique x>0 such that

1xdtt=1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The published number e and the integral function L.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

By [F1] and [L1], e=E(1). The inverse identity [F2] gives L(e)=L(E(1))=1.

F1L1F2algebra
2.1

Strict increase [L2] makes L injective. Hence if x>0 also satisfies L(x)=1=L(e), then x=e.

L2step 1.1
3.1

The defining integral for L converts steps 1.1 and 2.1 into the stated existence and uniqueness claim.

step 1.1step 2.1
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-13Open item page →

log is the unique continuous f:(0,)R with f(xy)=f(x)+f(y) and f(e)=1

Statement

The natural logarithm is the unique continuous function f:(0,)R satisfying

f(xy)=f(x)+f(y)(x,y>0),f(e)=1.

Facts & Assumptions

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Define g:RR by g(t):=f(E(t)). The addition law and the equation for f give g(a+b)=g(a)+g(b).

L1given
1.2

The function E is continuous by [L2], so g is continuous by [L3] and the assumed continuity of f.

L2L3given
1.3

Conversely, [L7] says that the natural logarithm is continuous and has the required equation. Moreover, [L5] gives e=E(1), so [F1] and [L6] give log(e)=L(E(1))=1. Thus it also has the required normalisation.

L7L5F1L6
2.1

By [L4], g(t)=ct for some cR.

step 1.1step 1.2L4
3.1

From [L5], E(1)=e, so c=g(1)=f(e)=1. Hence g(t)=t.

step 2.1L5given
4.1

For x>0, [F1] gives x=E(L(x)), so f(x)=g(L(x))=L(x)=logx by [L6].

F1step 3.1L6
5.1

Steps 4.1 and 1.3 prove existence and uniqueness.

step 4.1step 1.3
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-13Open item page →

log is the unique f with f(xy)=f(x)+f(y) that is differentiable at 1 with f(1)=1

Statement

The natural logarithm is the unique function f:(0,)R satisfying

f(xy)=f(x)+f(y)(x,y>0)

that is differentiable at 1 with f(1)=1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A function f satisfying the displayed equation, differentiable at 1, with f(1)=1.

[L3]

A differentiable function is continuous (A function differentiable at c is continuous at c).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Setting x=y=1 in the functional equation gives f(1)=2f(1), hence f(1)=0.

givenalgebra
1.2

Conversely, [L2] and [L5] give the product equation for log, while [L1] and [L5] give differentiability at 1 with derivative 1.

L2L1L5
2.1

Fix x>0. For h sufficiently close to 0, x+h>0, and the functional equation gives f(x+h)f(x)=f(1+h/x)f(1).

step 1.1givenalgebra
3.1

For h0, divide step 2.1 by h: f(x+h)f(x)h=1xf(1+h/x)f(1)h/x. As h0, [F1] and f(1)=1 show that f(x)=1/x.

step 2.1F1givenalgebra
4.1

Both f and L are differentiable on (0,), so [L6] makes fL differentiable, and step 3.1 with [L1] gives (fL)=0. By [L3], fL is continuous, so [L4] makes it constant.

step 3.1L1L3L4L6algebra
5.1

At 1, step 1.1 and [L1] give (fL)(1)=0, so step 4.1 yields f=L=log by [L5].

step 1.1step 4.1L1L5
6.1

Steps 5.1 and 1.2 prove existence and uniqueness.

step 5.1step 1.2
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-13Open item page →

Every continuous f with f(xy)=f(x)+f(y) is f(x)=clogx for a unique c, including c=0

Statement

If f:(0,)R is continuous and f(xy)=f(x)+f(y) for all x,y>0, then there is a unique cR such that

f(x)=clogx(x>0).

Here c=0 gives the zero function.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A continuous f satisfying the product-to-sum equation.

[F2]

For b>0, b1, one defines logbx=logx/logb (The logarithm to a positive base other than one).

[L5]

The natural logarithm is continuous and satisfies log(xy)=logx+logy (Order, continuity, range, and the product, quotient, and reciprocal laws for the natural logarithm).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Put g(t)=f(E(t)). By [F1] and the functional equation, g is additive. By [L1], [L2], and continuity of f, it is continuous.

F1L1L2given
1.2

Conversely, [L5] shows that each function xclogx is continuous and satisfies the product-to-sum equation. For c=0 this is the zero function.

L5algebra
1.3

If c0, put b=E(1/c). Then b>0 and logb=1/c0=log1, so b1; [F2] gives logbx=clogx. Thus the nonzero members are exactly the constant-multiple forms underlying logarithms to bases, while the zero member requires no division.

F1L4L5F2algebra
2.1

By [L3], g(t)=ct for a unique scalar c=g(1).

step 1.1L3
3.1

For x>0, x=E(L(x)), so f(x)=g(L(x))=cL(x)=clogx. By [L4], E(1)=e, hence c=g(1)=f(e), which also proves uniqueness.

F1step 2.1L4
4.1

Steps 3.1, 1.2, and 1.3 prove the classification and its endpoint case.

step 3.1step 1.2step 1.3
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-13Open item page →

The Mercator series, its value at 1 and the product law determine log on all positive reals, while the series alone is only local

Statement

There is exactly one function f:(0,)R such that

f(xy)=f(x)+f(y)(x,y>0)

and

f(1+u)=n=1(1)n+1unn(1<u1).

That function is the natural logarithm. The series condition itself is local; the product law is the continuation rule.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A function f satisfying the two displayed conditions.

[L1]

For 1<u1, log(1+u)=n=1(1)n+1un/n ([The power series for log(1+x) on (-1,1], including the Abel endpoint](/item/thm-log-one-plus-x-power-series)).

[L2]

The natural logarithm satisfies log(xy)=logx+logy (Order, continuity, range, and the product, quotient, and reciprocal laws for the natural logarithm).

[L3]

For every real r, there is a natural n1 with r<n (Every complete ordered field is Archimedean).

[F1]

Natural powers satisfy x0=1 and xn+1=xnx (Integer powers am).

[L4]

The induction principle proves a property for every natural once the base and successor steps are established (The principle of mathematical induction).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

The published natural logarithm satisfies the local series condition by [L1] and the product law by [L2], so an extension exists.

L1L2
1.2

From [F1], induction gives 2nn+1 for every natural n: equality holds at n=0, and 2n+1=22n2(n+1)n+2.

F1L4algebra
1.3

Repeated use of the product law, justified by induction, gives f(2k)=kf(2), and the series condition at u=1 determines f(2).

F1L4given
2.1

Given x>0, use [L3] to choose k1 with x<k. Then 2kk+1>k>x by step 1.2. Put y=x/2k and u=y1; thus 0<y<1 and 1<u<0.

L3step 1.2algebra
3.1

Since x=2ky=2k(1+u), the product law and the local series condition force f(x)=kf(2)+f(1+u)=kn=1(1)n+1n+n=1(1)n+1unn.

step 2.1step 1.3given
4.1

Formula 3.1 forces the value of any extension at every x>0, so at most one extension exists. Together with step 1.1, that unique extension is log.

step 3.1step 1.1
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-13Open item page →

Five characterisations of the natural logarithm are equivalent: inverse exponential, integral, continued Mercator series, Landau root limit and the normalised functional equation

Statement

The following five descriptions define the same function on (0,):

  1. the inverse of the published exponential function;
  2. x1xdt/t;
  3. the unique product-to-sum function whose values on 1+u for 1<u1 are the Mercator series;
  4. xlimn2n(x1/2n1);
  5. the unique continuous product-to-sum function satisfying f(e)=1.

Each is the natural logarithm.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The five descriptions listed in the statement.

[F1]

The natural logarithm is defined as the inverse of the exponential function (The natural logarithm as the inverse of the exponential function).

[L1]

The natural logarithm satisfies logx=1xdt/t and log(x)=1/x (The natural logarithm has derivative 1/x and equals the integral from 1 to x of 1/t).

[L2]

The independently constructed integral function satisfies L=log (The integral logarithm L is the published natural logarithm).

[L3]

The Mercator formula holds for 1<u1 ([The power series for log(1+x) on (-1,1], including the Abel endpoint](/item/thm-log-one-plus-x-power-series)), and exactly one product-law extension of those values exists, namely log (The Mercator series, its value at 1 and the product law determine log on all positive reals, while the series alone is only local).

[L4]

For x>0, logx=limn2n(x1/2n1) (Landau's root limit: log x is the limit of 2^n times (x^(1/2^n) minus 1)).

[L5]

The natural logarithm is the unique continuous product-to-sum function with f(e)=1 (log is the unique continuous f:(0,)R with f(xy)=f(x)+f(y) and f(e)=1).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Description 1 is the natural logarithm by [F1].

F1
1.2

Description 2 is the natural logarithm by the exact integral identity [L1], equivalently by the independently proved identification [L2].

L1L2
1.3

Description 3 first uses [L3]'s local series formula and then its product-law continuation theorem, which gives exactly the natural logarithm on the full positive domain.

L3
1.4

Description 4 equals the natural logarithm pointwise by [L4].

L4
1.5

Description 5 exists and is uniquely the natural logarithm by [L5].

L5
2.1

Since each description gives the same function log, all five characterisations are equivalent. The third description includes its continuation rule; it does not assert convergence of the original series with u=x1 for every positive x.

step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3step 1.4step 1.5
RemarkRemark: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicableaudited 2026-08-13Open item page →

Roadmap and non-circularity of the logarithm characterisations

Remark

The implication order is one-way until the bridge. The integral function L is defined and proved differentiable, multiplicative-to-additive, unbounded, and bijective without using the published exponential or natural logarithm. Its inverse E is then proved to satisfy E=E and E(0)=1. Only at that point does IVP uniqueness identify E with the published exponential; taking inverses identifies L with the published natural logarithm.

After the bridge, Five characterisations of the natural logarithm are equivalent: inverse exponential, integral, continued Mercator series, Landau root limit and the normalised functional equation compares already proved descriptions: inverse exponential, the integral, the continued Mercator series, the Landau limit, and the regular functional equation. This does not use one description to establish a premise needed earlier in the chain. It is the inverse-function counterpart of the separate exponential roadmap in The power-series, product-limit, IVP, functional-equation, and Picard definitions agree.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

None yet.

Sources