Alphabeta Math

The Integral Logarithm and the Equivalence of Its Characterisations: Examples and Counterexamples

About this page
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 5 results · all verified · 0 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 5 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.
1 · Prerequisites
Abstract Algebra
Combinatorics
Linear Algebra
Real Analysis
Set Theory
Topology
2 · Logical flowchart

3 · Items

Example

log 2 from four characterisations: hyperbolic area, the alternating harmonic series, Landau iterates and exp⁻¹(2)

Example

Dropping f(e)=1 leaves the whole family c log, including logarithms to other bases and the zero function

Counterexample

Assuming choice, a Hamel-basis additive map transported through exp gives a discontinuous logarithmic function that is not c log

Counterexample

For every x>2 the uncontinued Mercator series at u=x-1 diverges

Example

Integral bounds alone give 2<e<4; the sharper published bound is 2<e<3

Sources