How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Every continuous with is for a unique , including
Statement
If is continuous and for all , then there is a unique such that
Here gives the zero function.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A continuous satisfying the product-to-sum equation.
is differentiable (The inverse is differentiable, , and ), so it is continuous (A function differentiable at is continuous at ).
Composites of continuous functions are continuous (A composite of continuous functions is continuous, with no side hypothesis of the kind the composition of limits needs).
For , , one defines (The logarithm to a positive base other than one).
The natural logarithm is continuous and satisfies (Order, continuity, range, and the product, quotient, and reciprocal laws for the natural logarithm).
Proof
Put . By [F1] and the functional equation, is additive. By [L1], [L2], and continuity of , it is continuous.
Conversely, [L5] shows that each function is continuous and satisfies the product-to-sum equation. For this is the zero function.
If , put . Then and , so ; [F2] gives . Thus the nonzero members are exactly the constant-multiple forms underlying logarithms to bases, while the zero member requires no division.
By [L3], for a unique scalar .
For , , so . By [L4], , hence , which also proves uniqueness.
Steps 3.1, 1.2, and 1.3 prove the classification and its endpoint case.
Depends on
- The integral exponential $E:\mathbb R\to(0,\infty)$ as the inverse of $L$
- The inverse $E$ satisfies $E(a+b)=E(a)E(b)$
- The inverse $E$ is differentiable, $E'=E$, and $E(0)=1$
- The integral exponential $E$ is the published exponential function
- The integral logarithm $L$ is the published natural logarithm
- Six regularity conditions each force an additive $f : \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}$ to be $x \mapsto f(1)x$: continuity at a single point, monotonicity on a nondegenerate interval, boundedness above on one, boundedness below on one, constancy of sign on one, and a graph that is not dense in $\mathbb{R}^{2}$
- The real exponential function and the number $e$ by a power series
- The logarithm to a positive base other than one
- A function differentiable at $c$ is continuous at $c$
- A composite of continuous functions is continuous, with no side hypothesis of the kind the composition of limits needs
- Order, continuity, range, and the product, quotient, and reciprocal laws for the natural logarithm
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
52 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Henry Ricardo, The Equivalence of Definitions of the Natural Logarithm Function (standard reference, not scraped)