Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

L-p convergence of a lacunary series is equivalent to ell-two coefficients

Statement

For a q-Hadamard-lacunary sequence and coefficients (aj), the partial sums of j1ajeλj converge in Lp(T) if and only if (aj)2, for every 1p<. For 0<p<1, they converge if and only if (aj)2 in the complete metric dp of The Lp distance for 0<p<1 is a complete translation-invariant metric. Completeness above one is supplied by Riesz-Fischer completeness of Lp for 1p, and the finite estimate is L-p norm equivalence for finite Hadamard-lacunary sums.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: p,q,(λj) and (aj) as in the Statement.

Proof

technique · apply the finite estimate to tails and use completeness
1.1

If (aj)2, its coefficient tails tend to zero. The finite [given, algebra] estimate applied to differences of partial sums therefore makes them Cauchy in Lp for p1, and Cauchy in dp for 0<p<1 (raise the displayed finite estimate to the power p).

givenalgebra
2.1

The relevant cited completeness theorem gives a limit in the respective [step 1.1] space, so the partial sums converge.

step 1.1
3.1

Conversely, convergence makes the partial sums Cauchy. The lower finite [step 1.1, step 2.1, algebra] estimate applied to every difference of two partial sums forces the corresponding coefficient tail to tend to zero in 2. Thus (aj)2, proving both implications.

step 1.1step 2.1algebra

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources