Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

L-p norm equivalence for finite Hadamard-lacunary sums

Statement

Let q>1 and 0<p<∞. There are constants cp,q,Cp,q>0 such that every finite q-Hadamard-lacunary sum f=∑j∈Jajeλj satisfies

cp,q(∑j∈J∣aj∣2)1/2≤∥f∥Lp(T)≤Cp,q(∑j∈J∣aj∣2)1/2.

Here ∥f∥p=(∫01∣f∣p)1/p is a quasi-norm when 0<p<1. The L2 identity is Finite lacunary Fourier sums have their coefficient ell-two norm, the additive input is Hadamard gaps bound the additive representations used in even moments, and the usual p≥1 integral inequality is Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: p,q,J,(aj) and f as in the Statement; write A=(∑j∈J∣aj∣2)1/2.

Proof

technique · residue-class even moments, followed by interpolation or a distribution bound
1.1givenalgebra

For every integer m≥1, split J into r=r(m,q) residue classes [given, algebra] with qr>m. Expanding the 2m-th moment of each class, the additive lemma says that only equal index multisets survive integration. Their permutations give at most (m!)2 copies, and ∣∑ν=1rzν∣2m≤r2m−1∑ν∣zν∣2m. Consequently ∥f∥2m≤Bm,qA for a constant independent of J and the coefficients.

2.1step 1.1algebra

The cited L2 identity gives ∥f∥2=A. If 1≤p<2, Holder [step 1.1, algebra] applied to ∣f∣2=∣f∣θp∣f∣2m(1−θ), with 1/2=θ/p+(1−θ)/(2m), combines this identity and step 1.1 to give A≤∥f∥pθ(Bm,qA)1−θ. If p≥2, choose m with p≤2m and apply the same interpolation identity with 1/p between 1/2 and 1/(2m) for the upper bound. For the lower bound, normalized Haar measure has mass one, so Holder gives ∥f∥p≥∥f∥2=A whenever p≥2. Thus the stated two-sided estimate holds for every p≥1.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

Let 0<p<1. Step 1.1 with m=2 and the L2 identity give [step 1.1, step 2.1, algebra] ∫∣f∣2=A2 and ∫∣f∣4≤B2,q4A4. Cauchy--Schwarz applied to ∣f∣21{∣f∣≥A/2} shows that this set has measure at least dq>0; otherwise its complement contributes at most A2/2. Hence ∥f∥pp≥dq(A/2)p. Conversely tp≤1+t2 for t≥0, and applying this to t=∣f∣/A shows ∥f∥pp≤2Ap when A>0; the case A=0 is immediate. This proves both bounds for 0<p<1.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources