How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite lacunary Fourier sums have their coefficient ell-two norm
Statement
If is finite and is a lacunary sum in the sense of Hadamard-lacunary sequences and lacunary trigonometric series, then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite set and the displayed lacunary sum .
Proof
Expanding gives [given, algebra] The frequencies are distinct because the defining sequence is strictly increasing.
For an integer , direct integration gives [step 1.1, algebra] when and otherwise. Thus integration of step 1.1 retains precisely the terms and gives
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
2 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Loukas Grafakos, Classical Fourier Analysis, 3rd ed., §3.6.2 (standard reference, not scraped)