How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
L-infinity embeds continuously into BMO modulo constants
Statement
Every lies in with , so the class map is a continuous injection. Whether the injection is surjective is not claimed here; the companion examples page records an unbounded BMO function, which exhibits strictness independently.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A bounded function and a cube , with the cube convention, the mean and the seminorm and quotient of BMO seminorm and the quotient by constants.
The mean is defined by , and the seminorm is ; the zero-seminorm class is exactly the class of functions constant almost everywhere (BMO seminorm and the quotient by constants).
On a cube of finite volume, a bounded function is integrable and (BMO seminorm and the quotient by constants).
Proof
For every cube the triangle inequality and [F2] give , so is locally integrable and ; in particular .
Adding a constant to a representative gives by linearity of the integral, so the class map is well defined on : both quotients identify functions whose difference is almost everywhere constant. If two classes have the same image in , then is almost everywhere constant by the definition of that quotient as the quotient of by the constants, so and already represent the same class in ; that is injectivity.
By invariance of the BMO seminorm under constants and step 1.1, for every one has . Taking the infimum over gives for the quotient norms, so the induced class map is continuous; step 1.2 gives injectivity. Both statements are choice-free: only linearity of the integral and the definition of the seminorm are used.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Mark Williams, Notes on Harmonic Analysis (January 11, 2022) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Juha Kinnunen, Harmonic Analysis (Aalto University lecture notes) (standard reference, not scraped)