How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
BMO seminorm and the quotient by constants
Definition
Complex scalars, Lebesgue measure on , and the complex and test-function conventions of Complex Lp classes and Euclidean test-function conventions. A cube is a nondegenerate axis-parallel cube (Axis-parallel rectangles in and their volume). For and a cube put , so that is the mean of over , and define the seminorm , the supremum over all cubes, and . The mean is optimal up to a factor of in the average: where the infimum is over . Moreover exactly when is constant almost everywhere, so the page works with the quotient of equivalence classes modulo constants; a class is written and the zero class is the class of the constants. Replacing cubes by balls in the supremum defines an equivalent seminorm with comparison constants depending only on .
These assertions follow directly from the averages. For every , , so the triangle inequality gives the factor- upper bound; taking gives the other inequality. For locally integrable functions , homogeneity and give the seminorm laws. If the seminorm is zero, almost everywhere on each , . The constants agree on their positive-measure overlaps, and the exceptional set is the union of the explicit measurable null sets , hence is null by countable additivity of Lebesgue measure. Conversely an almost-everywhere constant has zero oscillation. Thus the quotient also identifies almost-everywhere equal representatives. Finally, if are measurable sets of finite positive measure and , then . Every ball is contained in a concentric cube of comparable volume, and every cube is contained in a concentric ball of comparable volume. Applying this inequality in both directions proves the cube/ball comparison.
Depends on
Used by
- BMO oscillation norms in Lq are equivalent Corollary
- L-infinity embeds continuously into BMO modulo constants Corollary
- Finite lacunary exponential sums belong to BMO Example
- Integrating the John-Nirenberg tail recovers the Lq oscillation bound Example
- The BMO seminorm is unchanged by adding a constant Example
- The logarithm is in BMO but not in L-infinity Example
- BMO averages on nested cubes grow at most logarithmically Lemma
- BMO classes are determined by their pairings with H1 atoms Lemma
- BMO functions pair uniformly with H1 atoms Lemma
- John-Nirenberg stopping cubes have geometric decay Lemma
- Range truncations preserve the BMO seminorm up to a constant Lemma
- Littlewood-Paley endpoint scope and the H1-BMO dual pair Remark
- BMO classes define bounded functionals on H1 Theorem
- Calderon-Zygmund operators map L-infinity to BMO Theorem
- John-Nirenberg exponential inequality Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
32 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Mark Williams, Notes on Harmonic Analysis (January 11, 2022) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Juha Kinnunen, Harmonic Analysis (Aalto University lecture notes) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Terence Tao, Math 247A Lecture Notes 4 (UCLA, Fall 2006) (standard reference, not scraped)