Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

BMO seminorm and the quotient by constants

Definition

Complex scalars, Lebesgue measure on Rn, and the complex Lp and test-function conventions of Complex Lp classes and Euclidean test-function conventions. A cube is a nondegenerate axis-parallel cube (Axis-parallel rectangles in Rm and their volume). For b∈Lloc1(Rn) and a cube Q put bQ:=∣Q∣−1∫Qb, so that bQ is the mean of b over Q, and define the BMO seminorm ∥b∥BMO:=sup⁡Q∣Q∣−1∫Q∣b−bQ∣∈[0,∞], the supremum over all cubes, and BMO(Rn):={b∈Lloc1:∥b∥BMO<∞}. The mean is optimal up to a factor of 2 in the average: ∣Q∣−1∫Q∣b−bQ∣≤2inf⁡c∣Q∣−1∫Q∣b−c∣≤2∣Q∣−1∫Q∣b−bQ∣ where the infimum is over c∈C. Moreover ∥b∥BMO=0 exactly when b is constant almost everywhere, so the page works with the quotient BMO(Rn)/C of equivalence classes modulo constants; a class is written b∈BMO/C and the zero class is the class of the constants. Replacing cubes by balls in the supremum defines an equivalent seminorm with comparison constants depending only on n.

These assertions follow directly from the averages. For every c∈C, ∣bQ−c∣≤∣Q∣−1∫Q∣b−c∣, so the triangle inequality gives the factor-2 upper bound; taking c=bQ gives the other inequality. For locally integrable functions b,d, homogeneity and (b+d)Q=bQ+dQ give the seminorm laws. If the seminorm is zero, b=bQm almost everywhere on each Qm=[−m,m]n, m≥1. The constants agree on their positive-measure overlaps, and the exceptional set is the union of the explicit measurable null sets Qm∩{b≠bQ1}, hence is null by countable additivity of Lebesgue measure. Conversely an almost-everywhere constant has zero oscillation. Thus the quotient also identifies almost-everywhere equal representatives. Finally, if E⊆F are measurable sets of finite positive measure and b∈L1(F), then ∣E∣−1∫E∣b−bE∣≤2(∣F∣/∣E∣)∣F∣−1∫F∣b−bF∣. Every ball is contained in a concentric cube of comparable volume, and every cube is contained in a concentric ball of comparable volume. Applying this inequality in both directions proves the cube/ball comparison.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

32 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources