How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite lacunary exponential sums belong to BMO
Example
Let , and let be nonzero real frequencies satisfying for every . Let have finite support and put Then More precisely, fix a nonnegative with on . For an interval of length and centre , set . There is a constant such that
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The finite exponential sum , the frequency bounds above, a nonnegative compactly supported smooth bump with on , and a nondegenerate interval .
For every locally integrable and every constant , and the BMO seminorm is the supremum of the mean oscillations over intervals in dimension one (BMO seminorm and the quotient by constants).
Since , both and are finite. For every integer , integration by parts times gives For this follows instead from ; combining the two estimates gives the displayed bound.
Verification
Fix , write , and let be the least integer with . Thus . Split at and choose
Low frequencies. For every , . After , The triangle inequality in , Cauchy--Schwarz, and the upper frequency bound therefore give because .
High frequencies. Define The change of variables and [L2] give, for every fixed integer , Choose an integer such that . If , the frequency comparability implies For each fixed , the terms with contribute at most a constant to . For their sum is bounded by using . For , there are at most terms, each bounded by ; their total is bounded uniformly because and . Hence the absolute row sums of are uniformly bounded. Since , the inequality yields
Combining the two pieces with gives Since on , Cauchy--Schwarz and [L1] imply Taking the supremum over all nondegenerate intervals proves the BMO bound. The proof uses finite sums only and no choice principle.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Terence Tao, Math 247A Lecture Notes 4 (UCLA, Fall 2006) (standard reference, not scraped)