Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

BMO functions pair uniformly with H1 atoms

Statement

Let b∈BMO(Rn) and let a be an H1 atom supported in a cube Q, i.e. a (1,∞,0)-atom in the sense of Hp atoms with a prescribed moment order: a vanishes off Q, ∣a∣≤∣Q∣−1 almost everywhere and ∫a=0. Then the integral ∫ab converges absolutely and ∣∫ab∣≤∥b∥BMO, with the bound independent of the atom and of Q.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: b∈BMO(Rn) and a (1,∞,0)-atom a supported in a cube Q with ∣a∣≤∣Q∣−1 almost everywhere and ∫a=0.

[F1]

The atom hypotheses are supp⁡a⊆Q, ∣a∣≤∣Q∣−1 almost everywhere and ∫Rna=0; an atom is bounded and compactly supported, hence locally integrable (Hp atoms with a prescribed moment order).

[F2]

b∈Lloc1(Rn), bQ=∣Q∣−1∫Qb and ∣Q∣−1∫Q∣b−bQ∣≤∥b∥BMO (BMO seminorm and the quotient by constants, A locally integrable function on Rn).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F2

The product ab is integrable: a vanishes off the cube Q and ∣a∣≤∣Q∣−1 almost everywhere by [F1], while ∫Q∣b∣<∞ by [F2], so ∫Rn∣a∣∣b∣≤∣Q∣−1∫Q∣b∣<∞.

2.1F1F2step 1.1algebra

Because ∫a=0 by [F1], subtracting the constant bQ changes nothing: ∫ab=∫a(b−bQ), and step 1.1 makes this integral absolutely convergent. Hence ∣∫ab∣≤∥a∥L∞∫Q∣b−bQ∣≤∣Q∣−1⋅∣Q∣⋅∥b∥BMO=∥b∥BMO, where the middle inequality uses the almost-everywhere bound on a and the last one the mean-oscillation bound of [F2].

3.1step 2.1∎

The estimate of step 2.1 depends only on ∥b∥BMO, with no reference to the particular atom or cube, so the pairing is bounded uniformly over all H1 atoms. No choice principle is used.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources