How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Nonconstant negative-gradient trajectories strictly decrease the function
Statement
If is a nonconstant negative-gradient trajectory, then for every .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A nonconstant negative-gradient trajectory .
The gradient vanishes exactly at a critical point (The Riemannian gradient vanishes exactly at the critical points).
An integral curve through a prescribed point is unique on its maximal interval (Through each point there is a unique maximal integral curve).
Proof
If were critical, [F2] would make the vector field vanish there, so the constant curve at is an integral curve through that point.
By [F3], that constant integral curve and agree on , contradicting the hypothesis that is nonconstant. Hence is never critical.
By [F2] the gradient is nonzero at every , and [F1] now gives for every .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ralph L. Cohen, Bundles, Manifolds, and Homotopy, Lemma 13.1 (standard reference, not scraped)