Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

One-dimensional Brownian motion is recurrent

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice and let B be a standard Brownian motion Brownian motion. Use the everywhere-continuous, zero-start representative fixed in One-dimensional Brownian motion hits every point almost surely, retaining the notation B. Then almost surely the set {t0:BtI} is unbounded for every nonempty open interval IR; equivalently, almost surely the path visits every neighbourhood of every real point at arbitrarily large times.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC and a standard Brownian motion B in the stated fixed everywhere-continuous, zero-start representative.

[F1]

For this representative, one-dimensional Brownian motion hits every deterministic level almost surely: P(Tc<)=1 for every cR. One-dimensional Brownian motion hits every point almost surely

[F2]

Future-path Markov: for each deterministic s0 and each bounded Borel functional ϕ on continuous path space, E[ϕ((Bs+t)t0)Fs]=ϕ(Bs+w)μ(dw) almost surely, where μ is Wiener measure. Future-path Markov property Natural and usual augmented Brownian filtrations

[F3]

Conditional-expectation versions are unique almost surely, so an event whose conditional probability given Fs equals 1 has probability one. Conditional expectation as an ae class Conditional expectation is unique almost surely

[F4]

Countable intersections of probability-one events have probability one, by continuity from above of a probability measure based at a probability-one event. Basic identities for a probability measure

[F5]

The rationals are dense in R, so every nonempty open interval contains a rational point. The rationals embed densely in the reals

[F6]

AC is the ambient assumption of the Brownian construction. The Axiom of Choice

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Fix cR and define on continuous path space ϕc(v)=1{t0:v(t)=c}. This functional is Borel: its one-set is m1{v:min0tmv(t)c=0}, and each displayed minimum is continuous for uniform convergence on [0,m] (changing the path by at most ε changes the minimum by at most ε). For every deterministic xR, [F1] applied under Wiener measure to the level cx gives ϕc(x+w)μ(dw)=1.

F1
2.1

Fix n1 and let Ac,n:={tn:Bt=c}. Because the chosen representative is everywhere continuous, 1Ac,n=ϕc((Bn+t)t0) pointwise. Applying [F2] and step 1.1 at time n therefore gives P(Ac,nFn)=1 almost surely; by [F3] this forces P(Ac,n)=1. This conditions a fixed Borel future-path event and evaluates its kernel at the known state Bn; it does not apply [F1] directly to a random level.

F1F2F3givenstep 1.1
3.1

For fixed c the events Ac,1Ac,2 all have probability one, so Ac:=n1Ac,n has probability one by [F4], and on Ac the path visits the level c at arbitrarily large times.

F4step 2.1
4.1

The intersection A:=cQAc over the countable set of rationals again has probability one by [F4]; on A, for every rational c and every time bound the path visits c at some larger time.

F4step 3.1
5.1

Let IR be a nonempty open interval. By [F5] choose a rational cI. On the probability-one event A of step 4.1 the path visits c, hence enters I, at arbitrarily large times. Since every nonempty open interval arises in this way and A does not depend on I, almost surely the set {t:BtI} is unbounded for every nonempty open interval I.

F5step 4.1
6.1

The equivalent formulation follows: for a real point y and ε>0, the interval (yε,y+ε) is nonempty and open, so it is visited at arbitrarily large times almost surely. The case of the empty interval is excluded, singleton intervals are not claimed as infinitely visited except through the containing open intervals, and the conclusion is about the unboundedness of the visit set, not about any integrability of a hitting time; the first visit of a fixed level is the almost-sure finiteness proved in [F1]. AC is used only through [F6].

F1F6givenstep 5.1

Source notes

On the source side, Sousi, Section 6.7, proves one-dimensional recurrence from the almost-sure finiteness of hitting times together with the restart argument, and Durrett, Section 7.4, records the same consequence. The statement here is the neighbourhood form actually consumed by the planar example on the companion page, which contrasts it with the polarity of single points in the plane.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

55 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources