Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A W2 limit in the partial one-homogeneous case is globally minimizing

Statement

Assume AC, the full partially one-homogeneous hypotheses, one of the two source boundary alternatives, and the separated bounded-box initialization in the preceding projected-limit theorem. If the Wasserstein gradient flow μt converges in W2 to μ∞∈P2(R×Θ), then μ∞ is a global minimizer of F over finite nonnegative measures.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, the assumptions in the Statement, and W2 convergence to μ∞.

[A1]

Assume the Axiom of Choice, as stated in the hypotheses and required by the flow and coupling suppliers. The Axiom of Choice

[F1]

W2 convergence implies weak convergence of the signed h1 projections. W2 convergence implies weak convergence of homogeneous projections

[F2]

The partial projected-limit theorem identifies the limiting signed projection as a minimizer of J and gives convergence of the flow energies to inf⁡J=inf⁡F. A partially homogeneous signed projection limit is a minimizer Relaxed objective for a partially one-homogeneous projection

[F3]

The partial feature energy is continuous under W2 convergence. Partial one-homogeneous energy is continuous under W2 convergence

Proof

Given: AC and the data in the Statement.

1.1A1F1F2given

By [F1], h1(μt) converges weakly to h1(μ∞). Apply [F2] to obtain F(μt)→inf⁡λ≥0F(λ).

2.1A1F2F3step 1.1∎

By [F3], F(μt)→F(μ∞) along the same W2-convergent flow. Therefore F(μ∞)=inf⁡λ≥0F(λ), which is the asserted global minimality.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

34 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources