How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
W2 convergence implies weak convergence of homogeneous projections
Statement
Assume AC. Let and , with . Then converges weakly as finite measures on to . More generally, if is closed and converge in W2, with first coordinate , then converges weakly as finite signed measures against every bounded continuous test on to .
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The quadratic transportation convergence and the projection definitions in the Statement.
AC supplies the couplings with cost tending to the W2 infimum used in the truncation proof. The Axiom of Choice
is the infimum of over couplings; AC permits a coupling with cost at most for every . The Euclidean quadratic Wasserstein space The Axiom of Choice
For continuous on the sphere, . For bounded continuous on , . Two-homogeneous measure projection Partially one-homogeneous signed measure projection
The family has uniformly bounded second moments, and the chosen couplings have quadratic displacement tending to zero, by the W2 convergence and coupling-cost choice in [F1].
Proof
Given: AC, the measures, and [F1]–[F3].
Let have joint law and write . AC supplies the sequence of couplings in [A1]. Then , and by . For bounded continuous , the function is continuous on the closed Euclidean subspace and has at most linear growth. Multiplying by a continuous radial cutoff of compact support in that closed subspace gives a uniformly continuous function, so convergence in probability of gives convergence of its expectations. The truncation error is uniformly small because and the same bound holds for . Hence . By [F2], this is weak convergence of against every such .
Fix continuous on and set , for . This function is continuous and . The quadratic moments are asymptotically uniformly integrable: if , then either or . Using [A1], , and splitting the term at gives The right side tends uniformly to zero in the limit followed by ; the same estimate applies to . A compactly supported continuous truncation of has convergent integrals because it is uniformly continuous and in probability. The asymptotic tail bound makes the truncation error tend to zero. Hence , which is weak convergence of by [F2].
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
33 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Lénaïc Chizat and Francis Bach, On the Global Convergence of Gradient Descent for Over-parameterized Models using Optimal Transport (standard reference, not scraped)
- Luigi Ambrosio, Nicola Gigli, and Giuseppe Savaré, Gradient Flows in Metric Spaces and in the Space of Probability Measures (standard reference, not scraped)