Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A W2 limit in the two-homogeneous case is globally minimizing

Statement

Assume AC, the full two-homogeneous hypotheses and separated compact initialization in the preceding global-minimizer theorem. If the Wasserstein gradient flow μt converges in W2 to μ∞∈P2(Rd), then μ∞ is a global minimizer of F over finite nonnegative measures.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, the assumptions in the Statement, and W2(μt,μ∞)→0.

[A1]

Assume the Axiom of Choice, as stated in the hypotheses and required by the flow and coupling suppliers. The Axiom of Choice

[F1]

W2 convergence implies weak convergence of the two-homogeneous projections. W2 convergence implies weak convergence of homogeneous projections

[F2]

The projected-limit theorem makes its weak limit a global minimizer and states that F(μt) converges to the energy of that limit. A separating two-homogeneous flow has globally minimizing projection limits

[F3]

For a positive two-homogeneous feature and regularizer, F(λ)=R(∫Φdh2(λ))+∫Vdh2(λ) whenever λ has finite second moment. Feature and energy identities for homogeneous projections

[F4]

Bounded continuous real tests determine Borel probability measures on any metric space. Weak limits are unique

Proof

Given: AC and the data in the Statement.

1.1A1F1given

Apply [F1] to obtain weak convergence h2(μt)⇀h2(μ∞).

2.1A1F2F4step 1.1

The projected-limit theorem [F2] applies to this weak limit. If it denotes the limit by ν, then for every continuous test on the compact sphere both ν and ρ:=h2(μ∞) give the limit of the same integrals ∫fdh2(μt). Testing f≡1 shows that both have the same total mass M. If M=0, both finite nonnegative measures are zero. If M>0, then ν/M and ρ/M are Borel probability measures with equal integrals against every bounded continuous test, so [F4] gives ν=ρ. Viewed as a measure on Rd, this limit globally minimizes F over all finite nonnegative Borel measures, exactly as asserted by the theorem.

3.1F2F3step 2.1∎

By [F3], the feature and regularizer integrals of μ∞ equal those of its two-homogeneous projection, so F(μ∞)=F(h2(μ∞)). By step 2.1, this equals the global minimum of F over finite nonnegative Borel measures on Rd, and therefore μ∞ is itself a global minimizer.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources