Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Feature and energy identities for homogeneous projections

Statement

Let d≥2, let H be a real Hilbert space, let R:H→[0,∞) be continuous, and let Φ:Rd→H and V:Rd→[0,∞) be continuous and positively two-homogeneous. For a finite nonnegative Borel measure λ on Rd with finite second moment, define the feature-measure energy F(λ):=R ⁣(∫RdΦ(u)dλ(u))+∫RdV(u)dλ(u). The integrals are finite because the continuous two-homogeneous maps grow at most quadratically. For every such μ,

∫RdΦ(u)dμ(u)=∫Sd−1Φ(θ)dh2(μ)(θ),∫RdV(u)dμ(u)=∫Sd−1V(θ)dh2(μ)(θ).

If (μn) is a sequence of such measures and h2(μn) converges weakly as finite measures on the compact sphere to a finite nonnegative measure ν, then the feature integrals converge in Hilbert norm, the regularizer integrals converge, and F(μn)→R(∫Sd−1Φdν)+∫Sd−1Vdν. The continuity of R is the risk premise used for this energy conclusion; it holds in particular under the feature-energy hypotheses.

For the partially one-homogeneous model, let Θ be a closed Euclidean subset, let φ:Θ→H be bounded and norm-continuous into a separable real Hilbert space, and let V~:Θ→[0,∞) be bounded and measurable. Put Φ(w,θ)=wφ(θ) and V(w,θ)=∣w∣V~(θ). For every finite nonnegative Borel measure μ on R×Θ with ∫∣w∣dμ<∞ and every z∈H, the exact feature identity is ⟨z,∫wφ(θ)dμ⟩=∫⟨z,φ(θ)⟩dh1(μ), using the scalar pairing defined in the partial projection, and the penalty inequality is ∫∣w∣V~(θ)dμ≥∫V~dh1(μ). Define the lifted energy in this model by F(μ)=R(∫wφ(θ)dμ)+∫∣w∣V~(θ)dμ. If finite signed projections h1(μn) converge narrowly to ν, meaning convergence against every bounded continuous real test on Θ, then their feature moments converge weakly in H when φ is bounded and continuous. If AC holds, then for closed Euclidean Θ and bounded norm-continuous φ into a separable Hilbert space, they converge in Hilbert norm. Signed projection convergence alone does not imply penalty or full energy convergence for arbitrary lifts.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The two projection definitions and the hypotheses in the Statement.

[F1]

h2(μ)(A)=∫u≠01A(u/∣u∣)∣u∣2dμ(u) is a finite measure on Sd−1. Two-homogeneous measure projection

[F2]

For every bounded measurable scalar ψ, the projection pairing is ∫ψdh1(μ)=∫wψ(θ)dμ, and h1(μ) is a finite signed measure. Partially one-homogeneous signed measure projection

[F3]

A bounded linear map commutes with Bochner integration, so equality of all scalar evaluations by elements of H∗ determines equality of the Hilbert-valued integrals. Bounded linear maps commute with Bochner integration

[F4]

Under AC, signed narrow convergence on a closed Euclidean subset controls bounded norm-continuous Bochner moments in norm. Signed narrow convergence controls variation tails and Bochner moments The Axiom of Choice

Proof

Given: The measures and feature maps in the Statement.

1.1F1givenalgebra

On Rd∖{0}, write u=∣u∣ρ(u). Positive two-homogeneity gives Φ(u)=∣u∣2Φ(ρ(u)) and V(u)=∣u∣2V(ρ(u)); at u=0 both vanish. Integrating these identities and applying the definition of h2 proves both displayed projection identities.

2.1F1givenchoosestep 1.1

For weak convergence on the compact sphere, the masses h2(μn)(Sd−1) are bounded. The continuous map Φ∣Sd−1 has compact image in H. Given ϵ>0, choose finitely many vectors gj=Φ(θj) whose open ϵ-balls cover that image and put Uj={θ:∥Φ(θ)−gj∥<ϵ}. Define rj(θ)=dist⁡(θ,Sd−1∖Uj) when the complement is nonempty, and rj≡1 when Uj=Sd−1. The continuous functions ψj=rj/(∑iri) are well-defined because the finite open sets cover the sphere, and ψj(θ)>0 only when θ∈Uj. Therefore ∥Φ(θ)−∑jψj(θ)gj∥<ϵ uniformly. Weak convergence gives convergence of each scalar coefficient ∫ψjdh2(μn), hence strong convergence of the approximating vector integrals. The uniform approximation error is at most ϵ times the uniformly bounded masses, so ∫Φdh2(μn)→∫Φdν in norm. Since V∣Sd−1 is continuous, weak convergence also gives ∫Vdh2(μn)→∫Vdν. Continuity of R proves the energy limit.

3.1F2F3F4givenalgebrastep 2.1∎

If Θ=∅, the only finite measures on Θ and R×Θ are zero, so all partial feature moments and penalties vanish and all asserted convergence conclusions hold directly. Otherwise Θ is nonempty. In this case, fix z∈H and apply [F2] to the bounded scalar function ψ(θ)=⟨z,φ(θ)⟩. This gives the displayed feature identity for every z, hence equality of the Hilbert-valued feature moments because inner products determine vectors. For the penalty, ∣w∣−w=2w−≥0, and [F2] applied to V~ gives ∫∣w∣V~(θ)dμ−∫V~dh1(μ)=2∫w−V~(θ)dμ≥0. If h1(μn) converges against bounded continuous scalar tests, testing against ⟨z,φ(⋅)⟩ for each z∈H proves weak convergence of the feature moments. Under the additional AC, closed-Euclidean, separable-Hilbert assumptions in the Statement, [F4] improves this to norm convergence. For the claimed failure of penalty determination, take any nonempty Θ and fix θ∈Θ. Let μ1 assign mass one to (1,θ) and let μ2 assign mass two to (1,θ) and mass one to (−1,θ). Then both have h1 equal to the measure assigning mass one to θ, while their ∣w∣ penalties for V~≡1 are 1 and 3, respectively. Thus h1 convergence alone cannot imply penalty or energy convergence.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

24 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources