Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Signed narrow convergence controls variation tails and Bochner moments

Statement

Assume AC. Let X be a nonempty closed subset of Rk and let σn,ν be finite signed Borel measures on X, with ∫fdσn→∫fdν for every bounded continuous real function f on X. Then their total variations have uniformly bounded masses and are uniformly tight. For every bounded norm-continuous map ϕ:X→H into a separable real Hilbert space, ∥∫ϕdσn−∫ϕdν∥H⟶0. Also ∥σn−ν∥BL→0, where the bounded-Lipschitz norm uses ∥f∥∞+Lip⁡(f)≤1. For every nonnegative ψ∈Cc(X) and bounded nonnegative continuous W on X, ∫ψdν+≤lim inf⁡n∫ψdσn+,∫Wd∣ν∣≤lim inf⁡n∫Wd∣σn∣. Signed Bochner integrals mean the difference of the two Jordan-part integrals. The same conclusions about moments and BL convergence hold as t→∞ for a narrowly convergent continuous-time family, by the sequential criterion. Here narrow convergence explicitly means convergence against every function in Cb(X), not merely compactly supported tests.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC and the hypotheses in the Statement.

[F1]

Finite signed measures have Jordan/Hahn decompositions under AC, and variation is the sum of the Jordan parts and the supremum of partition sums. Jordan decomposition of a signed measure into unique mutually singular positive parts For a signed measure, total variation is nu-plus plus nu-minus, finite partitions suffice, and nu-plus and nu-minus are extremal

[F2]

Finite Borel measures on the second-countable locally compact space X are regular. Locally finite Borel measures on second-countable LCH spaces are regular

[F3]

A pointwise bounded family of continuous linear maps on a Banach space has uniformly bounded operator norms under DC, supplied by AC. Uniform boundedness principle The Axiom of Choice The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an N-indexed chain AC implies DC implies countable choice

[F4]

Bounded strongly measurable functions on a finite measure space are Bochner integrable. Bochner-integrable function Bochner integrability criterion

Proof

Given: The data and assumptions in the Statement.

1.1F1F2F3construct

The supremum-norm space Cb(X) is Banach: a uniformly Cauchy sequence converges pointwise, hence uniformly, and a uniform limit of continuous functions is continuous. A signed measure σ defines a bounded functional Tσf=∫fdσ of norm ∣σ∣(X). The upper bound is the variation inequality. For the reverse bound, use [F1] and [F2] to choose disjoint compact subsets of the two Hahn pieces with omitted variation arbitrarily small. The distance formula separating these compacts gives a bounded continuous function equal to 1 and −1 there, with magnitude at most one, whose integral approaches ∣σ∣(X). Since Tσnf converges for every f, [F3] gives sup⁡n∣σn∣(X)<∞.

2.1F1F2F3step 1.1construct

Put yn=σn−ν and suppose their variations are not uniformly tight. Some ϵ>0 then remains outside every compact ball for an arbitrarily late index: each fixed finite set of indices is tight by [F2]. Recursively choose nj increasing, radii Rj→∞, and qj∈Cc(X) with disjoint supports in {Rj−1<∣x∣<Rj}, ∣qj∣≤1, and ∫qjdynj≥ϵ/2. At stage j, choose an index threshold so late that ∣∫∑i<jqidyn∣<ϵ/8 thereafter, using narrow convergence. Enlarge the exclusion ball to make every earlier-index variation tail smaller than ϵ, and select a later index with tail at least ϵ. Regularity of its positive and negative Hahn pieces and distance cutoffs with compact support in that exterior produce qj with the required integral. Finally choose Rj larger than its support and with ∣ynj∣(X∖BRj)<ϵ/8. Increasing radii by one leaves gaps between the annuli. The locally finite sum q=∑jqj lies in Cb(X) with ∣q∣≤1. Its pairing with ynj is at least ϵ/2−ϵ/8−ϵ/8=ϵ/4: the earlier terms are small by construction and the entire later sum is bounded by the chosen tail. This contradicts narrow convergence to zero. Thus (∣yn∣) is uniformly tight. Since ∣σn∣≤∣yn∣+∣ν∣ and the fixed finite measure ∣ν∣ is tight by [F2], (∣σn∣) is uniformly tight as well.

3.1F2F4step 1.1step 2.1construct

Given δ>0, choose compact K with sup⁡n∣σn∣(X∖K)+∣ν∣(X∖K)<δ. On K a finite sum ϕϵ=∑i=1Nhiψi, with ψi∈Cc(X), approximates ϕ uniformly within ϵ, and can be chosen with ∥ϕϵ∥∞≤∥ϕ∥∞. To construct it, cover K by finitely many relative balls on which ϕ varies by less than ϵ, use distance cutoffs, normalize their sum near K, and multiply by a compact cutoff equal to one on K; choose hi as feature values at the centers. Its integral converges in norm by scalar narrow convergence of the finitely many ψi. The remaining norm error is at most ϵ(∣σn∣(X)+∣ν∣(X))+2∥ϕ∥∞(∣σn∣(X∖K)+∣ν∣(X∖K)). Let ϵ,δ↓0 to prove the Bochner-moment conclusion; [F4] gives existence of all integrals.

4.1step 1.1step 2.1constructstep 3.1

The restrictions to K of the bounded-Lipschitz unit ball have finite uniform ϵ-nets. Explicitly take a finite ϵ-net of points of K, round each function's values there to a rational grid in [−1,1], and use its Lipschitz bound to control the error between those points. Only finitely many rounded value patterns occur; retain one actual function for each occurring pattern. Narrow convergence controls their finitely many pairings, while step 1.1 bounds the uniform approximation error on K and step 2.1 bounds all tail errors. Letting the mesh and tail bound decrease proves BL convergence.

5.1F1F2step 3.1step 4.1∎

For 0≤q≤ψ with q∈Cc(X), ∫ψdσn+≥∫qdσn→∫qdν. The supremum of the last quantity over such q equals ∫ψdν+: use the Hahn pieces, compact regular approximation, and distance cutoffs to approximate their sign restriction. Similarly, for q∈Cc(X) with ∣q∣≤W, ∫Wd∣σn∣≥∫qdσn→∫qdν, and the supremum is ∫Wd∣ν∣. For the lower bound in this supremum, multiply W by a compact cutoff and a continuous function of magnitude at most one that is 1 and −1 on compact subsets of the two Hahn pieces; omitted weighted variation tends to zero by [F2]. These prove the two lower-semicontinuity claims without assuming convergence of Jordan parts. Any failure of a continuous-time moment or BL limit yields a sequence tn→∞ contradicting the result just proved.

Source note

This is a local signed-convergence lemma for the Euclidean interface used in Chizat–Bach Appendix A.1/C.2.2. It is not an imported signed Prokhorov theorem. BL convergence alone on an unbounded domain is not being asserted sufficient for signed narrow convergence without further hypotheses.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

41 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources