Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A partial signed projection limit has convergent penalty and energy

Statement

Assume AC and the full partially homogeneous hypotheses of the stationarity lemma: a separable real Hilbert space H; the feature-energy hypotheses with convex differentiable R:H→[0,∞) whose differential is locally Lipschitz on bounded subsets and bounded on sublevels; d≥2; bounded continuously differentiable maps φ:Θ→H and V~:Θ→[0,∞) with Lipschitz differentials; Φ(w,θ)=wφ(θ) and the semiconvex potential V(w,θ)=∣w∣V~(θ); and the nested cutoff and derivative-growth conditions of the feature-energy definition. For every f∈H, require dense regular values for Gf(θ)=⟨f,φ(θ)⟩+V~(θ). Retain either (i) Θ is the closure of a nonempty bounded connected open convex set with C1 boundary and dGf(θ)[nθ]=0 on ∂Θ for every f∈H, or (ii) Θ=Rd−1 and, for every f∈H, Gf(r⋅) converges uniformly in C1(Sd−2) as r→∞ to a function with dense regular values.

Let μt be a Wasserstein gradient flow in P2(R×Θ) with finite initial energy. Suppose the finite signed projections σt=h1(μt) converge narrowly to a finite signed measure ν, meaning convergence of integrals against every bounded continuous real test function on Θ. Put mν=∫φ dν, with the intrinsic signed Bochner-integral convention, and J(ν)=R(mν)+∫V~ d∣ν∣. Then lim⁡t→∞∫∣w∣V~(θ) dμt(w,θ)=∫V~ d∣ν∣,lim⁡t→∞F(μt)=J(ν). No separation condition on the initial support is required.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, the full partial hypotheses, the flow μt, and narrow signed-projection convergence in the Statement.

[F1]

The intrinsic signed projection factors the feature moment: mt:=∫wφ(θ)dμt=∫φ dσt. The relaxed-objective inequality gives Pt:=∫∣w∣V~(θ)dμt≥∫V~ d∣σt∣. Partially one-homogeneous signed measure projection Relaxed objective for a partially one-homogeneous projection

[F2]

Narrow convergence of finite signed measures on a closed Euclidean domain gives norm convergence of their integrals against bounded norm-continuous Hilbert-valued maps. For bounded nonnegative continuous W, it also gives ∫Wd∣ν∣≤lim inf⁡t→∞∫Wd∣σt∣. Signed narrow convergence controls variation tails and Bochner moments

[F3]

The energy is nonnegative and nonincreasing. With ft=∇R(mt) and S(t)=∫w2dμt≥0, the exact identity S(t)−S(s)=−2∫st(⟨fq,mq⟩+Pq)dq holds for every finite 0≤s≤t. Partial feature flows have exact energy and weight-moment identities

[F4]

Writing aν(θ)=⟨∇R(mν),φ(θ)⟩, signwise stationarity gives aν+V~=0 ν+-almost everywhere and −aν+V~=0 ν−-almost everywhere. Stationarity of a partially homogeneous signed projection limit

[A1]

The existing AC assumption supplies the choice hypotheses inherited from these suppliers. The Axiom of Choice

Proof

Given: The data in the Statement and [F1]–[F4].

1.1A1F1F2F3given

By [F1] and [F2], mt→mν in Hilbert norm. Continuity of R and local Lipschitz continuity of its differential imply R(mt)→R(mν) and ft→fν:=∇R(mν) in norm, hence ⟨ft,mt⟩→⟨fν,mν⟩. By [F3], F(μt) decreases to a finite limit E∞≥0. Since F(μt)=R(mt)+Pt, it follows that Pt→P∞:=E∞−R(mν).

2.1F1F2step 1.1

Put Pν=∫V~ d∣ν∣. The static inequality [F1] and weighted-variation lower semicontinuity [F2], applied to the bounded nonnegative continuous function V~, give P∞≥lim inf⁡t→∞∫V~ d∣σt∣≥Pν. This does not require convergence of the separate raw sign measures or their Jordan parts.

3.1F1F4step 2.1

Integrate the two stationarity equalities [F4] against the respective finite Jordan parts. The intrinsic signed Bochner integral and ∣ν∣=ν++ν− give ⟨fν,mν⟩=∫aνdν+−∫aνdν−=−∫V~dν+−∫V~dν−=−Pν. All integrands are bounded, so these integrals are finite.

4.1F3step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1

If P∞>Pν, let ϵ=(P∞−Pν)/2>0. Steps 1.1 and 3.1 imply that there is a finite T such that ⟨fq,mq⟩+Pq≥ϵ for every q≥T. The all-endpoint moment identity [F3] then gives S(t)≤S(T)−2ϵ(t−T) for every finite t≥T. Choosing t>T+S(T)/(2ϵ) contradicts S(t)≥0. Hence P∞≤Pν, which together with step 2.1 yields P∞=Pν.

5.1F1step 1.1step 4.1∎

Therefore Pt→Pν, and step 1.1 gives F(μt)→R(mν)+Pν=J(ν). These are the two asserted limits.

Source note

Appendix C.4.2 motivates the projected-limit energy claim. The convergence of the lifted penalty is proved here from signwise stationarity, signed norm-moment convergence and the exact weight-moment identity; continuity of the penalty as a function of the signed projection is not assumed.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

35 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources