Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Stationarity of a partially homogeneous signed projection limit

Statement

Assume AC, a separable real Hilbert space H, and the feature-energy hypotheses: R is convex and differentiable with locally Lipschitz differential bounded on sublevels, Φ is Fr\acute{e}chet differentiable, V is semiconvex, and the nested cutoff sets and derivative-growth bounds in the feature-energy definition hold. Let d≥2, Θ⊆Rd−1, φ:Θ→H be bounded and continuously differentiable with Lipschitz differential, and V~:Θ→[0,∞) be bounded and continuously differentiable with Lipschitz differential; set Φ(w,θ)=wφ(θ) and V(w,θ)=∣w∣V~(θ). For every f∈H, require dense regular values for Gf(θ)=⟨f,φ(θ)⟩+V~(θ). Retain either (i) Θ is the closure of a nonempty bounded connected open convex set with C1 boundary and dGf(θ)[nθ]=0 on ∂Θ for every f∈H, or (ii) Θ=Rd−1 and for every f∈H, Gf(r⋅) converges uniformly in C1(Sd−2) to a limit with dense regular values as r→∞. Write Φ(w,θ)=wφ(θ), V(w,θ)=∣w∣V~(θ), and let μt be a Wasserstein gradient flow. Suppose the finite signed measures h1(μt) converge weakly on Θ to a finite signed measure ν, where weak convergence means convergence against every function in Cb(Θ). Define mν:=∫φdν by the signed Bochner-integral convention for the relaxed objective. Put aν(θ)=dRmν[φ(θ)], G+(θ)=aν(θ)+V~(θ), and G−(θ)=−aν(θ)+V~(θ). Then G+=0 for ν+-almost every point and G−=0 for ν−-almost every point, where ν=ν+−ν− is the Jordan decomposition. This is the sign-correct formulation of stationarity for the reduced functional J(ν)=R(∫φ dν)+∫V~ d∣ν∣.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC and the full hypotheses in the Statement.

[F1]

Signed narrow convergence on the closed Euclidean domain implies norm convergence of bounded continuous Hilbert-valued moments, BL convergence, and positive-Jordan-part lower semicontinuity. Signed narrow convergence controls variation tails and Bochner moments

[F2]

The actual flow satisfies the all-endpoint energy and radial identities, finite total action, and S(t)≤S(0)+Ct when its feature moments are bounded. Partial feature flows have exact energy and weight-moment identities

[F3]

The raw projections αt,βt are nonnegative and σt=h1(μt)=αt−βt; their difference's Jordan parts need not equal them. Partially one-homogeneous signed measure projection

Proof

Given: The flow and signed projection in the Statement.

1.1F1F2given

Write mt=∫φdσt and ft=∇R(mt). By [F1], mt→mν in norm, so ft→fν in norm and G±,t=±⟨ft,φ⟩+V~ converge uniformly to G±. The functions have a common finite magnitude bound B≥1. The moments are uniformly bounded for all t≥0: convergence bounds the tail, and finite-horizon continuity from [F2] bounds the remaining compact interval. Thus [F2] gives S(t)≤S(0)+Ct and ∫0∞A(t)dt<∞, where A(t)=∫∣vt∣2dμt.

2.1F1F3step 1.1construct

Suppose G+ is nonzero on a set of positive ν+ measure. Regularity yields δ>0 and ψ∈Cc(Θ), 0≤ψ≤1, supported in {∣G+∣>2δ}, with c0=∫ψdν+>0. Indeed choose a compact subset of a positive-measure level set and a continuous distance cutoff in that open set. For late t, ∣G+,t∣≥δ on this support. Since αt≥σt+ (use the partition formula for the positive part of αt−βt), [F1] gives lim inf⁡t→∞∫ψdαt≥c0. This asserts no convergence of either raw component.

3.1F2F3F4step 1.1step 2.1algebra

Put L(t)=∫w>0wG+,t2dμt+∫w<0(−w)G−,t2dμt. Step 2.1 implies L(t)≥δ2c0/2 eventually. Off w=0, the weight component of the flow velocity is −G+,t for positive weights and G−,t for negative weights. Therefore [F4] gives L(t)2≤(∫w≠0Gsign⁡(w),t2dμt)(∫w≠0w2Gsign⁡(w),t2dμt)≤A(t)B2S(t). Thus A(t)≥c/(S(0)+Ct) for almost every sufficiently late t. A zero denominator contradicts L(t)>0; a positive constant denominator already forces infinite action, and a growing linear denominator has divergent reciprocal integral. Every case contradicts [F2]. Hence G+=0 ν+-almost everywhere.

4.1F1F2F3F4step 3.1∎

Apply steps 2.1–3.1 with −σt=βt−αt, its positive limit part ν−, and G− in place of G+. This proves G−=0 ν−-almost everywhere, completing both sign conclusions.

Source note

The action is integrated against μt, whereas the projection carries the factor ∣w∣. The radial second-moment identity and the Cauchy–Schwarz estimate bridge those measures. The proof never identifies raw components with Jordan parts, never assumes their separate convergence, and does not import an AGS stationarity theorem.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

41 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources