How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
For every , the class forbidding and has the Erdős–Hajnal property
Statement
For every integer , every finite graph with no induced and no induced has a clique or stable set of size at least a positive power of its order. Equivalently, the class forbidding and has the Erdős–Hajnal property.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An integer .
For this , the class forbidding and has the strong Erdős–Hajnal property (For every , the class forbidding and has the strong Erdős–Hajnal property).
Every hereditary class with the strong Erdős–Hajnal property has the Erdős–Hajnal property (The strong Erdős–Hajnal property implies the Erdős–Hajnal property).
Proof
The previous theorem gives the strong Erdős–Hajnal property for the hereditary class of graphs forbidding and .
Applying [L2] to that class yields the Erdős–Hajnal property.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Nicolas Bousquet, Aurélie Lagoutte, and Stéphan Thomassé, The Erdős-Hajnal Conjecture for Paths and Antipaths, Theorem 4 (standard reference, not scraped)