Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-28
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

For every k, the class forbidding Pk and Pk‾ has the strong Erdős–Hajnal property

Statement

For every integer k≥2, there exists a real constant γk>0 such that every finite graph G with no induced Pk and no induced Pk‾ and with ∣V(G)∣≥2 contains disjoint sets A,B⊆V(G) with

∣A∣≥γk∣V(G)∣,∣B∣≥γk∣V(G)∣,

and such that (A,B) is a pure pair. Equivalently, the hereditary class forbidding Pk and Pk‾ has the strong Erdős–Hajnal property.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An integer k≥2.

[L1]

For every graph H and every ϵ∈(0,12) there exists δ>0 such that every nonempty H-free graph has a linearly large vertex set whose self-density is at most ϵ or at least 1−ϵ (The edge-density form of Rödl's theorem: every nonempty H-free graph has a linearly large set of self-density at most ϵ or at least 1−ϵ).

[L2]

If a nonempty set has self-density at most c, then it has a subset of at least half its size that is 4c-sparse (A set of self-density at most c has a subset of at least half its size that is 4c-sparse).

[L4]

A graph class has the strong Erdős–Hajnal property exactly when some linear constant works for every nontrivial graph in the class (The strong Erdős–Hajnal property for a hereditary graph class).

[F1]

A set is c-sparse exactly when every vertex of its induced subgraph has degree at most c times the set size (c-sparse, c-dense and c-restricted vertex sets).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenconstruct

We first prove the connected-case claim: for each r≥2 there are constants εr>0 and cr>0 such that every connected graph J on m≥2 vertices has a vertex of degree greater than εrm, or contains an induced Pr starting at every vertex, or has a biclique of size at least crm in J‾. We prove this by induction on r.

2.1step 1.1base

For r=2, choose ε2:=1/2 and c2:=1/4. Every vertex of a connected graph on at least two vertices is incident with an edge, so every vertex starts an induced P2. Thus the claim holds for r=2.

3.1step 2.1ihchoosealgebra

Fix r>2, assume the claim for r−1, and let εr:=εr−1/(2+εr−1). Since εr<1/2, choose any constant 0<cr≤min⁡{(1−2εr)/4, cr−1(1−εr)/2}. Now let J be a connected graph on m≥2 vertices for which the first outcome fails, so every vertex has degree at most εrm. Fix a vertex v1 and put S:=V(J)∖(NJ(v1)∪{v1}). Then ∣S∣≥(1−εr)m−1. Since J is connected, v1 has degree at least 1, so m≥1/εr and therefore ∣S∣≥(1−2εr)m.

4.1step 3.1L3choosealgebra

Suppose every connected component of J[S] has size at most ∣S∣/2. Choose components greedily until their union A has size in the interval [∣S∣/4,∣S∣/2]: if the running union first reaches ∣S∣/4 before it exceeds ∣S∣/2, stop there; otherwise the next component itself has size in [∣S∣/4,∣S∣/2] and we take that one alone. Let B:=S∖A. Then ∣A∣,∣B∣≥∣S∣/4, and [L3] makes A anticomplete to B in J. Hence A and B form a biclique of size at least ∣S∣/4≥crm in J‾.

4.2step 3.1ihchoosealgebra

Suppose instead that J[S] has a connected component S′ with ∣S′∣>∣S∣/2. Because J is connected, some vertex v2∈NJ(v1) has a neighbour in S′. Let J2:=J[S′∪{v2}], which is connected. Every vertex of J2 still has degree at most εrm, and εrm=εr−1(1−εr)m/2<εr−1(∣S′∣+1)=εr−1∣V(J2)∣ because ∣S′∣+1>∣S∣/2+1≥(1−εr)m/2. So the first outcome of the induction hypothesis is false for J2.

5.1step 4.2ihalgebradischarge-induction

Apply the induction hypothesis to J2 with parameter r−1. If outcome 2 holds there, then J2 contains an induced Pr−1 starting at v2, and prefixing this path with v1 gives an induced Pr in J starting at v1 because v1 is adjacent to v2 and has no neighbours in S′. If outcome 3 holds there, then J2‾ contains a biclique of size at least cr−1∣V(J2)∣≥cr−1(1−εr)m/2≥crm, and the same biclique lies in J‾. Thus, whenever outcome 1 fails for J, either outcome 2 or outcome 3 follows. This completes the induction and proves the connected-case claim.

6.1step 5.1L1choose

Let ε:=εk/8. Because Pk is the standard k-vertex path, [L1] applied to H=Pk yields a constant δ>0 such that every nonempty Pk-free graph has a vertex set of size at least δn whose self-density is at most ε or at least 1−ε.

7.1step 6.1given

Let G be a graph with no induced Pk and no induced Pk‾, and let n:=∣V(G)∣≥2. If G has a set of size at least δn and self-density at least 1−ε, apply the same argument to G‾: an induced Pk in G‾ would be an induced Pk‾ in G, and an induced Pk‾ in G‾ would be an induced Pk in G. So G‾ belongs to the same forbidden class. Replacing G by G‾ if necessary, we may assume that G has a set S0 with ∣S0∣≥δn and self-density at most ε.

8.1step 7.1L2F1algebra

By [L2], the set S0 contains a subset S with ∣S∣≥∣S0∣/2≥δn/2 such that S is 4ε-sparse. By [F1], every vertex of G[S] therefore has degree at most 4ε∣S∣=εk∣S∣/2.

9.1step 8.1L3choosealgebra

If every connected component of G[S] has size at most ∣S∣/2, then the same greedy argument as in step 4.1 partitions those components into anticomplete sets A,B⊆S with ∣A∣,∣B∣≥∣S∣/4≥δn/8. This is already a pure pair in G.

9.2step 5.1step 8.1algebra

Otherwise G[S] has a connected component S′ with ∣S′∣>∣S∣/2. Every vertex of G[S′] has degree at most εk∣S∣/2<εk∣S′∣, and G[S′] is Pk-free because induced subgraphs preserve forbidden induced paths. Applying the connected-case claim from step 5.1 to the connected graph G[S′], outcome 1 is false by the degree bound and outcome 2 is false because G[S′] contains no induced Pk at all. Hence outcome 3 holds, so G[S′]‾ has a biclique with both sides of size at least ck∣S′∣≥ckδn/4. Equivalently, G has an anticomplete pair of that size.

10.1step 9.1step 9.2L4choose∎

Let γk:=min⁡{δ/8,ckδ/4}. Steps 9.1 and 9.2 show that every graph with no induced Pk or Pk‾ and at least two vertices contains a pure pair with both sides of size at least γkn. By [L4], the class forbidding Pk and Pk‾ has the strong Erdős–Hajnal property.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

37 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources