Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-07-31
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The connected components of a graph partition its vertex set and are its maximal connected subgraphs

Statement

The vertex sets CG(v)C_G(v) of the connected components of a graph GG are nonempty, cover V(G)V(G), and any two are equal or disjoint. Each induced graph G[CG(v)]G[C_G(v)] is connected and contains every connected subgraph of GG that contains vv. Consequently the connected components are precisely the maximal connected subgraphs of GG.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A graph G=(V,E)G=(V,E) and the reachability classes CG(v)C_G(v).

[L1]
[F1]

CG(v)C_G(v) is the set of vertices reachable from vv, and the connected component at vv is the induced graph G[CG(v)]G[C_G(v)] (Connected graphs and connected components defined by the existence of vertex paths, Subgraphs, induced subgraphs and spanning subgraphs).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Reflexivity in [L1] gives vCG(v)v\in C_G(v), so every class is nonempty and the classes cover VV.

L1F1
1.2

If CG(u)C_G(u) and CG(v)C_G(v) meet at ww, then uu reaches ww and ww reaches vv by symmetry; transitivity gives that uu reaches vv, and another use of symmetry and transitivity shows a vertex reaches uu exactly when it reaches vv. Thus CG(u)=CG(v)C_G(u)=C_G(v), so distinct classes are disjoint.

L1F1
1.3

If x,yCG(v)x,y\in C_G(v), then xx reaches vv and vv reaches yy; concatenating these paths gives a walk from xx to yy, and deleting any repeated segments gives a path all of whose vertices remain reachable from vv. Hence G[CG(v)]G[C_G(v)] is connected.

L1F1
1.4

If a connected subgraph HH contains vv, every vertex xx of HH is joined to vv by a path in HH, hence also in GG, so xCG(v)x\in C_G(v). Thus HH is a subgraph of G[CG(v)]G[C_G(v)].

F1
2.1

Steps 1.1 and 1.2 give the partition assertion, and steps 1.3 and 1.4 say exactly that its induced subgraphs are connected and maximal among connected subgraphs.

step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3step 1.4

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 17 results over 12 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources