How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Every simple planar graph with vertices has at most edges, with equality for every plane triangulation
Statement
Every simple planar graph with vertices and edges satisfies . Every plane triangulation with at least three vertices has equality. Indeed, Every plane triangulation with at least three vertices is connected supplies the connectedness needed for Euler's formula. By A two-connected plane graph of order at least three is maximal exactly when every face is triangular, this includes every two-connected maximal plane graph of that order. Connected components are those of The connected components of a graph partition its vertex set and are its maximal connected subgraphs.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A simple planar graph with a fixed plane embedding, vertices and edges.
For every connected plane graph, (Euler's formula for every connected plane graph).
For a connected plane graph, writing for the length of the facial boundary walk of , ; consequently, if every facial boundary walk has length at least a positive natural , then (Facial boundary walks of a connected plane graph sum to , and if every such walk has length at least then ).
Every plane triangulation with at least three vertices is connected (Every plane triangulation with at least three vertices is connected).
Proof
First suppose the graph is connected. If it is a tree then . Otherwise simplicity makes every facial boundary walk have length at least three, so [L2] gives . Combining this with [L1], , yields , hence .
[L2] supplies more than its inequality: for a connected plane graph it gives the exact facial total , from which that inequality is only the consequence drawn there.
If the graph is disconnected, first redraw it. Each component drawing is a finite union of segments and so is bounded, so translating and scaling the components into pairwise disjoint discs gives a plane drawing of the same abstract graph in which every component meets the unbounded face; the bound to be proved does not depend on the drawing. Now join the components by noncrossing edges through that face until the drawing is connected. This preserves simplicity and planarity, keeps fixed, and only increases the number of edges. Step 1.1 applied to the augmented graph therefore bounds the original by .
Let the graph be a plane triangulation with vertices. By [L3] it is connected, and every face has boundary a triangle, so for every face. Then step 1.2 reads , and [L1] gives , so and .
Depends on
- Euler's formula $|V|-|E|+|F|=2$ for every connected plane graph
- Facial boundary walks of a connected plane graph sum to $2|E|$, and if every such walk has length at least $g$ then $g|F|\le2|E|$
- Every plane triangulation with at least three vertices is connected
- A two-connected plane graph of order at least three is maximal exactly when every face is triangular
- The connected components of a graph partition its vertex set and are its maximal connected subgraphs
Used by
- Every nonnull simple planar graph has a vertex of degree at most five Corollary
- K₅ and K_3,3 are nonplanar Corollary
- K_3,3 satisfies |E|≤3|V|-6 but is nonplanar, so the planar edge bound is not sufficient Counterexample
- For a two-connected planar graph of order at least three, maximal planarity is equivalent to having 3n-6 edges Proposition
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 71 results over 16 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- R. Diestel, Graph Theory, 6th ed., Corollary 4.2.10 (standard reference, not scraped)
- R. Grassl and O. Levin, Exploring Combinatorial Mathematics, Activity 298 (standard reference, not scraped)