Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-11
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A two-connected plane graph of order at least three is maximal exactly when every face is triangular

Statement

A two-connected plane graph with at least three vertices is maximal plane if and only if it is a plane triangulation (Maximal plane graphs, plane triangulations, and maximally planar abstract graphs). Two-connectivity is what makes every facial boundary a cycle (Every face of a two-connected plane graph is bounded by a cycle); Plane embeddings of finite simple graphs, their faces, facial boundary walks and lengths (counting a bridge twice), and planar graphs assumes no boundary walk is a cycle until a connectivity result proves it, and the polygonal Jordan argument below is about polygons, not about walks that may repeat a vertex. Facial walks and cycles use Face frontiers are unions of whole edges; a cycle edge borders two faces and a bridge borders one and Walks, closed walks, trails, paths and cycles, with length equal to the number of traversed edges.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A plane graph GG with at least three vertices.

[L1]

A polygon has exactly two regions, one bounded and one unbounded, and each has frontier the polygon (Polygonal Jordan curve theorem: a polygon has exactly two complementary regions and is the frontier of each).

[L2]

In a two-connected plane graph, every facial boundary walk is a cycle (Every face of a two-connected plane graph is bounded by a cycle).

[L3]

For a polygon PP and a point xPx\notin P, the parity of the transverse crossings of a general-position ray from xx is independent of the ray, is constant on an open neighbourhood of xx in the complement, and is therefore constant on each region of R2P\mathbb R^2\setminus P (The parity of transverse ray crossings with a polygon is locally constant on its complement); such a ray exists because only finitely many directions meet a vertex or run along a segment (Every point off a polygon admits a ray meeting it transversely in finitely many nonvertex points).

[L4]

A region of the complement of a set is a connected component of that complement (Regions of the complement of a planar set and their frontiers), and every connected component of an open subset of Rn\mathbb R^n is open and polygonally connected (Every connected component of an open subset of Rn\mathbb{R}^n is open and polygonally connected).

[L5]

If the relative interior of an edge meets the frontier of a face, the whole edge lies in that frontier (Face frontiers are unions of whole edges; a cycle edge borders two faces and a bridge borders one).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Let ff be a face of GG. By [L2] its boundary walk is a cycle CC, drawn as a polygon. By [L5] every frontier point of ff in the relative interior of an edge puts that whole edge in the frontier, so Fr(f)\operatorname{Fr}(f) is exactly the point set of CC. Now ff is connected and disjoint from CC, so it lies in one region R0R_0 of CC [L1, L4]; ff is open, and fR0=(fC)R0=f\overline f\cap R_0=(f\cup C)\cap R_0=f, so ff is also closed in R0R_0. A nonempty clopen subset of the connected R0R_0 is all of it, so the face is one of the two regions of its own boundary cycle.

L1L2L4L5
1.2

If instead every face is triangular, the interior of any proposed new plane edge is connected and disjoint from the drawing, so it lies in one face, with both endpoints on that face's boundary [L4]. Those endpoints are already adjacent because that boundary is a triangle, so no missing edge can be added.

givenL4
1.3

The two regions of a polygon PP carry different crossing parities. Fix a point pp in the relative interior of one of the finitely many segments making up PP, so pp is not a vertex, and by [L6] take a disc DD about pp small enough to meet PP only in that segment. Then DPD\setminus P is two open half-discs, each connected and disjoint from PP and so contained in a single region [L4]; by [L1] there are exactly two regions and each has frontier PpP\ni p, so each meets DD, and therefore the two half-discs lie in different regions. Only finitely many directions fail to be in general position for PP [L3], and only the two directions along the segment fail to meet it transversely, so some direction dd avoids both finite sets. Put q=pεdq=p-\varepsilon d and q=p+εdq'=p+\varepsilon d with ε\varepsilon small enough that both lie in DD; since dd is not along the segment, qq and qq' lie in the two different half-discs, and [q,q][q,q'] meets PP only at pp. The ray from qq in direction dd is [q,q][q,q'] followed by the ray from qq' in direction dd, so its crossing count is that of the latter plus the single transverse crossing at pp. Both rays are in general position, so by [L3] those counts are the parities of qq and of qq', which therefore differ; and parity is constant on each region [L3].

L1L3L4L6
2.1

Let uu be a vertex of CC. By [L6] a small enough disc DD about uu contains no other vertex and meets the drawing only in initial straight segments of the finitely many edges at uu. Deleting those segments leaves finitely many open sectors of DD, each connected and disjoint from the drawing and hence inside a single face [L4]. Since uFr(f)u\in\operatorname{Fr}(f), points of ff lie in every disc about uu, so one sector SS satisfies SfS\subseteq f, and the straight radius from uu into SS meets the drawing only at uu.

step 1.1L4L6
3.1

Let uvu\ne v be vertices of CC, with radii as in step 2.1 and inner endpoints u,vfu',v'\in f. By step 1.1 ff is a region, hence an open connected plane set and polygonally connected [L4], so a polygonal path joins uu' to vv' inside ff; discarding the portion between the first and last visit to each repeated point makes it simple. Concatenating the two radii with it gives a polygonal arc from uu to vv meeting the drawing only at uu and vv. If uu and vv are nonadjacent in GG, drawing the edge uvuv along that arc keeps the drawing plane, so GG is not maximal plane.

step 1.1step 2.1L4
4.1

Suppose now GG is maximal plane and some facial boundary cycle CC has length at least four. Let u1,u2,u3,u4u_1,u_2,u_3,u_4 occur in this cyclic order on CC and let P1,P2P_1,P_2 be the two u1u_1u3u_3 subpaths of CC, with u2u_2 on P1P_1 and u4u_4 on P2P_2. Both pairs are nonconsecutive on CC, so by step 3.1 u1u3u_1u_3 and u2u4u_2u_4 are edges of GG, neither an edge of CC; write e,ee,e' for their arcs. They share no endpoint, so by [L6] the relative interior of each avoids CC and the other, and both avoid ff because they are part of the drawing. Hence J1=eP1J_1=e\cup P_1 and J2=eP2J_2=e\cup P_2 are polygons.

step 3.1L6assume-contra
5.1

From any point off CeC\cup e there is a ray meeting that finite union of segments transversely in finitely many nonvertex points, by the finiteness count of [L3], and one such ray is in general position for CC, ee, J1J_1 and J2J_2 at once. Its crossings with J1J_1 plus its crossings with J2J_2 equal its crossings with CC plus twice its crossings with ee, so those three parities satisfy J1+J2=CJ_1+J_2=C modulo two at every point off CeC\cup e. Now ff avoids CC, J1J_1 and J2J_2 and is connected, so all three parities are constant on it, say p1p_1, p2p_2 and p1+p2p_1+p_2. The relative interior of ee' is connected and also avoids J1J_1 and J2J_2, so its J1J_1- and J2J_2-parities are constant. Its endpoint u4u_4 is off J1J_1 and lies in Fr(f)\operatorname{Fr}(f) by step 1.1, so a neighbourhood of u4u_4 off J1J_1 carrying a constant parity [L3] meets both ff and that relative interior, forcing the J1J_1-parity along ee' to be p1p_1; symmetrically u2J2u_2\notin J_2 forces the J2J_2-parity to be p2p_2. The CC-parity along ee' is then p1+p2p_1+p_2, that of ff. The two regions of CC carry different parities by step 1.3, so equal CC-parity places the relative interior of ee' in the same region of CC as ff — which by step 1.1 is ff itself. That is impossible for part of the drawing, so the assumption fails and every facial boundary cycle has length three.

step 1.1step 1.3step 4.1L3discharge-contradiction
6.1

The order assumption excludes the one- and two-vertex degeneracies, and steps 5.1 and 1.2 prove both directions.

step 5.1step 1.2

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 115 results over 21 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources