How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A two-connected plane graph of order at least three is maximal exactly when every face is triangular
Statement
A two-connected plane graph with at least three vertices is maximal plane if and only if it is a plane triangulation (Maximal plane graphs, plane triangulations, and maximally planar abstract graphs). Two-connectivity is what makes every facial boundary a cycle (Every face of a two-connected plane graph is bounded by a cycle); Plane embeddings of finite simple graphs, their faces, facial boundary walks and lengths (counting a bridge twice), and planar graphs assumes no boundary walk is a cycle until a connectivity result proves it, and the polygonal Jordan argument below is about polygons, not about walks that may repeat a vertex. Facial walks and cycles use Face frontiers are unions of whole edges; a cycle edge borders two faces and a bridge borders one and Walks, closed walks, trails, paths and cycles, with length equal to the number of traversed edges.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A plane graph with at least three vertices.
A polygon has exactly two regions, one bounded and one unbounded, and each has frontier the polygon (Polygonal Jordan curve theorem: a polygon has exactly two complementary regions and is the frontier of each).
In a two-connected plane graph, every facial boundary walk is a cycle (Every face of a two-connected plane graph is bounded by a cycle).
For a polygon and a point , the parity of the transverse crossings of a general-position ray from is independent of the ray, is constant on an open neighbourhood of in the complement, and is therefore constant on each region of (The parity of transverse ray crossings with a polygon is locally constant on its complement); such a ray exists because only finitely many directions meet a vertex or run along a segment (Every point off a polygon admits a ray meeting it transversely in finitely many nonvertex points).
A region of the complement of a set is a connected component of that complement (Regions of the complement of a planar set and their frontiers), and every connected component of an open subset of is open and polygonally connected (Every connected component of an open subset of is open and polygonally connected).
If the relative interior of an edge meets the frontier of a face, the whole edge lies in that frontier (Face frontiers are unions of whole edges; a cycle edge borders two faces and a bridge borders one).
Each edge is a polygonal arc, a finite union of segments, and edge arcs meet only at a common endpoint (Polygonal arcs and polygons as non-self-intersecting finite unions of line segments in , Plane embeddings of finite simple graphs, their faces, facial boundary walks and lengths (counting a bridge twice), and planar graphs).
Proof
Let be a face of . By [L2] its boundary walk is a cycle , drawn as a polygon. By [L5] every frontier point of in the relative interior of an edge puts that whole edge in the frontier, so is exactly the point set of . Now is connected and disjoint from , so it lies in one region of [L1, L4]; is open, and , so is also closed in . A nonempty clopen subset of the connected is all of it, so the face is one of the two regions of its own boundary cycle.
If instead every face is triangular, the interior of any proposed new plane edge is connected and disjoint from the drawing, so it lies in one face, with both endpoints on that face's boundary [L4]. Those endpoints are already adjacent because that boundary is a triangle, so no missing edge can be added.
The two regions of a polygon carry different crossing parities. Fix a point in the relative interior of one of the finitely many segments making up , so is not a vertex, and by [L6] take a disc about small enough to meet only in that segment. Then is two open half-discs, each connected and disjoint from and so contained in a single region [L4]; by [L1] there are exactly two regions and each has frontier , so each meets , and therefore the two half-discs lie in different regions. Only finitely many directions fail to be in general position for [L3], and only the two directions along the segment fail to meet it transversely, so some direction avoids both finite sets. Put and with small enough that both lie in ; since is not along the segment, and lie in the two different half-discs, and meets only at . The ray from in direction is followed by the ray from in direction , so its crossing count is that of the latter plus the single transverse crossing at . Both rays are in general position, so by [L3] those counts are the parities of and of , which therefore differ; and parity is constant on each region [L3].
Let be a vertex of . By [L6] a small enough disc about contains no other vertex and meets the drawing only in initial straight segments of the finitely many edges at . Deleting those segments leaves finitely many open sectors of , each connected and disjoint from the drawing and hence inside a single face [L4]. Since , points of lie in every disc about , so one sector satisfies , and the straight radius from into meets the drawing only at .
Let be vertices of , with radii as in step 2.1 and inner endpoints . By step 1.1 is a region, hence an open connected plane set and polygonally connected [L4], so a polygonal path joins to inside ; discarding the portion between the first and last visit to each repeated point makes it simple. Concatenating the two radii with it gives a polygonal arc from to meeting the drawing only at and . If and are nonadjacent in , drawing the edge along that arc keeps the drawing plane, so is not maximal plane.
Suppose now is maximal plane and some facial boundary cycle has length at least four. Let occur in this cyclic order on and let be the two – subpaths of , with on and on . Both pairs are nonconsecutive on , so by step 3.1 and are edges of , neither an edge of ; write for their arcs. They share no endpoint, so by [L6] the relative interior of each avoids and the other, and both avoid because they are part of the drawing. Hence and are polygons.
From any point off there is a ray meeting that finite union of segments transversely in finitely many nonvertex points, by the finiteness count of [L3], and one such ray is in general position for , , and at once. Its crossings with plus its crossings with equal its crossings with plus twice its crossings with , so those three parities satisfy modulo two at every point off . Now avoids , and and is connected, so all three parities are constant on it, say , and . The relative interior of is connected and also avoids and , so its - and -parities are constant. Its endpoint is off and lies in by step 1.1, so a neighbourhood of off carrying a constant parity [L3] meets both and that relative interior, forcing the -parity along to be ; symmetrically forces the -parity to be . The -parity along is then , that of . The two regions of carry different parities by step 1.3, so equal -parity places the relative interior of in the same region of as — which by step 1.1 is itself. That is impossible for part of the drawing, so the assumption fails and every facial boundary cycle has length three.
The order assumption excludes the one- and two-vertex degeneracies, and steps 5.1 and 1.2 prove both directions.
Depends on
- Every face of a two-connected plane graph is bounded by a cycle
- Maximal plane graphs, plane triangulations, and maximally planar abstract graphs
- Face frontiers are unions of whole edges; a cycle edge borders two faces and a bridge borders one
- Polygonal Jordan curve theorem: a polygon has exactly two complementary regions and is the frontier of each
- Walks, closed walks, trails, paths and cycles, with length equal to the number of traversed edges
- The parity of transverse ray crossings with a polygon is locally constant on its complement
- Every point off a polygon admits a ray meeting it transversely in finitely many nonvertex points
- Regions of the complement of a planar set and their frontiers
- Polygonal arcs and polygons as non-self-intersecting finite unions of line segments in $\mathbb R^2$
- Plane embeddings of finite simple graphs, their faces, facial boundary walks and lengths (counting a bridge twice), and planar graphs
- Every connected component of an open subset of $\mathbb{R}^n$ is open and polygonally connected
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 115 results over 21 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- R. Diestel, Graph Theory, 6th ed., Proposition 4.2.8 (standard reference, not scraped)