How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Every face of a two-connected plane graph is bounded by a cycle
Statement
In a two-connected plane graph (Plane embeddings of finite simple graphs, their faces, facial boundary walks and lengths (counting a bridge twice), and planar graphs, Vertex cuts, edge cuts, vertex connectivity and edge connectivity , with conventions for complete and one-vertex graphs), every facial boundary walk is a cycle (Walks, closed walks, trails, paths and cycles, with length equal to the number of traversed edges). The graph is finite and its edges are polygonal arcs; the separation argument uses Polygonal Jordan curve theorem: a polygon has exactly two complementary regions and is the frontier of each.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite simple polygonal plane graph that is two-connected, and one of its faces .
A plane graph has distinct vertex points and simple polygonal edge arcs with disjoint interiors; its faces are the connected regions of the drawing's complement, and a facial boundary walk follows the face along the frontier (Plane embeddings of finite simple graphs, their faces, facial boundary walks and lengths (counting a bridge twice), and planar graphs, Polygonal arcs and polygons as non-self-intersecting finite unions of line segments in ).
Two-connectivity means at least three vertices and connectedness after deleting any one vertex. Paths and cycles have the usual finite-graph meanings (Vertex cuts, edge cuts, vertex connectivity and edge connectivity , with conventions for complete and one-vertex graphs, Connected graphs and connected components defined by the existence of vertex paths, Walks, closed walks, trails, paths and cycles, with length equal to the number of traversed edges).
A polygon has exactly two complementary regions, each with the polygon as frontier (Polygonal Jordan curve theorem: a polygon has exactly two complementary regions and is the frontier of each).
Proof
The graph contains a cycle: two-connectivity gives minimum degree at least two, and a nonbacktracking walk in this finite graph eventually repeats a vertex, yielding a cycle. Choose any cycle and set . If omits a vertex, choose a component of . It has an attachment to because is connected, and at least two distinct attachment vertices : otherwise its sole attachment would disconnect when deleted, contrary to [L2]. Choose edges from to vertices of and a simple path between those vertices within ; their union is an – ear whose internal vertices are new. If already contains every vertex but misses an edge, add that edge as a one-edge ear. Each operation adds an edge, so finitely many operations exhaust . Every intermediate stays two-connected: deleting an old vertex leaves the old connected, with each surviving part of the new ear attached to a surviving endpoint; deleting an internal ear vertex leaves the old connected and both remaining ear parts attached to it.
We establish a polygonal crosscut claim, including the unbounded case. Let be a polygon with complementary regions , let lie on , and let a simple polygonal arc join to with . The two – arcs of give simple polygons , because meets only at its endpoints. By [L3], each has two regions with frontier ; let contain and let be the other. Every point of has a small connected disk disjoint from that meets , so it lies in . Hence misses all of ; since it also misses , it lies in . Moreover lies in : it is connected and misses , and near any point of the open arc it meets , because that arc lies in both and the frontier of . Symmetrically , so . At each choose a disk in missing nonlocal pieces of . The disk minus the local straight piece, or the two incident pieces at a bend, has exactly two connected sectors. Since lies in the frontier of each , both meet the disk; their disjointness assigns one sector to each. Let be a component of . It is open because each of its points has a connected small disk in , and it is closed in as every component is. Its relative closure in meets ; otherwise would also be closed in connected and equal , although is nonempty. A local disk at such a closure point shows meets or . Each is open and closed in , since its frontier misses that set, so connected lies wholly in one . Conversely each is connected. Therefore is exactly the two-component decomposition. The other old region is unchanged. Thus has precisely three regions with frontiers , whether is bounded or unbounded.
Induct over the ears from step 1.1 with the invariant that every face of the current drawing has frontier exactly the drawn image of one graph cycle and is one of the two regions of . For the initial cycle , [L3] gives the invariant. Let be the next ear. Its relative interior is connected and avoids the old drawing, so it lies in one old face ; its distinct endpoints are limits of that interior and hence lie on . Put and let . Apply step 1.2: splits into two new regions with frontiers the graph cycles and . Every other old face misses , remains connected and open in the new complement, and is closed there because its old frontier lies in the retained drawing. Thus each remains one component with its former cycle frontier, and the invariant continues.
At the final drawing , the chosen face is a region of the complement of its frontier cycle . The face lies on one local side of every edge of ; its facial boundary walk traverses those edges once in cyclic order and no other edge, because its frontier is exactly . Therefore the facial boundary walk is that graph cycle. The same induction covers every face, including the unbounded one.
Depends on
- Plane embeddings of finite simple graphs, their faces, facial boundary walks and lengths (counting a bridge twice), and planar graphs
- Polygonal arcs and polygons as non-self-intersecting finite unions of line segments in $\mathbb R^2$
- Polygonal Jordan curve theorem: a polygon has exactly two complementary regions and is the frontier of each
- Vertex cuts, edge cuts, vertex connectivity $\kappa(G)$ and edge connectivity $\lambda(G)$, with conventions for complete and one-vertex graphs
- Connected graphs and connected components defined by the existence of vertex paths
- Walks, closed walks, trails, paths and cycles, with length equal to the number of traversed edges
Used by
- Every edge-maximal graph of order at least four with no subdivision of K₅ or K_3,3 is three-connected Lemma
- Every three-connected graph with no K₅ or K_3,3 minor is planar Lemma
- Facial boundary walks of a connected plane graph sum to 2|E|, and if every such walk has length at least g then g|F|≤2|E| Lemma
- A two-connected plane graph of order at least three is maximal exactly when every face is triangular Proposition
- In a three-connected plane graph, face boundaries are exactly the induced cycles whose deletion leaves the graph connected Proposition
Dependency tree · two levels
19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- R. Diestel, Graph Theory, 6th ed., Proposition 4.2.6 (standard reference, not scraped)