Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-29
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Every face of a two-connected plane graph is bounded by a cycle

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite simple polygonal plane graph G that is two-connected, and one of its faces f.

[L1]

A plane graph has distinct vertex points and simple polygonal edge arcs with disjoint interiors; its faces are the connected regions of the drawing's complement, and a facial boundary walk follows the face along the frontier (Plane embeddings of finite simple graphs, their faces, facial boundary walks and lengths (counting a bridge twice), and planar graphs, Polygonal arcs and polygons as non-self-intersecting finite unions of line segments in R2).

[L3]

A polygon has exactly two complementary regions, each with the polygon as frontier (Polygonal Jordan curve theorem: a polygon has exactly two complementary regions and is the frontier of each).

Proof

technique · induction on a finite ear construction
1.1givenL1L2

The graph G contains a cycle: two-connectivity gives minimum degree at least two, and a nonbacktracking walk in this finite graph eventually repeats a vertex, yielding a cycle. Choose any cycle C and set H=C. If H omits a vertex, choose a component K of G−V(H). It has an attachment to H because G is connected, and at least two distinct attachment vertices a,b: otherwise its sole attachment would disconnect G when deleted, contrary to [L2]. Choose edges from a,b to vertices of K and a simple path between those vertices within K; their union is an a–b ear whose internal vertices are new. If H already contains every vertex but misses an edge, add that edge as a one-edge ear. Each operation adds an edge, so finitely many operations exhaust G. Every intermediate H stays two-connected: deleting an old vertex leaves the old H connected, with each surviving part of the new ear attached to a surviving endpoint; deleting an internal ear vertex leaves the old H connected and both remaining ear parts attached to it.

1.2L1L3

We establish a polygonal crosscut claim, including the unbounded case. Let J be a polygon with complementary regions V,W, let p≠q lie on J, and let a simple polygonal arc Q join p to q with Q∖{p,q}⊆V. The two p–q arcs J1,J2 of J give simple polygons Di=Ji∪Q, because Q meets J only at its endpoints. By [L3], each Di has two regions with frontier Di; let Zi contain W and let Yi be the other. Every point of J∖Ji has a small connected disk disjoint from Di that meets W, so it lies in Zi. Hence Yi misses all of J; since it also misses W⊆Zi, it lies in V. Moreover Y2 lies in Z1: it is connected and misses D1, and near any point of the open arc J2∖{p,q} it meets Z1, because that arc lies in both Z1 and the frontier of Y2. Symmetrically Y1⊆Z2, so Y1∩Y2=∅. At each x∈Q∖{p,q} choose a disk in V missing nonlocal pieces of Q. The disk minus the local straight piece, or the two incident pieces at a bend, has exactly two connected sectors. Since x lies in the frontier of each Yi, both Yi meet the disk; their disjointness assigns one sector to each. Let N be a component of V∖Q. It is open because each of its points has a connected small disk in V∖Q, and it is closed in V∖Q as every component is. Its relative closure in V meets Q∖{p,q}; otherwise N would also be closed in connected V and equal V, although Q∖{p,q} is nonempty. A local disk at such a closure point shows N meets Y1 or Y2. Each Yi is open and closed in V∖Q, since its frontier Di misses that set, so connected N lies wholly in one Yi. Conversely each Yi is connected. Therefore V∖Q=Y1⊔Y2 is exactly the two-component decomposition. The other old region W is unchanged. Thus J∪Q has precisely three regions with frontiers J,D1,D2, whether V is bounded or unbounded.

2.1baseihstep 1.1step 1.2L1L3

Induct over the ears from step 1.1 with the invariant that every face F of the current drawing has frontier exactly the drawn image of one graph cycle JF and is one of the two regions of R2∖JF. For the initial cycle C, [L3] gives the invariant. Let Q be the next ear. Its relative interior is connected and avoids the old drawing, so it lies in one old face F; its distinct endpoints are limits of that interior and hence lie on Fr⁡(F)=JF. Put J=JF and let V=F. Apply step 1.2: Q splits F into two new regions Y1,Y2 with frontiers the graph cycles J1∪Q and J2∪Q. Every other old face misses Q, remains connected and open in the new complement, and is closed there because its old frontier lies in the retained drawing. Thus each remains one component with its former cycle frontier, and the invariant continues.

3.1step 2.1L1L2discharge-induction∎

At the final drawing H=G, the chosen face f is a region of the complement of its frontier cycle Jf. The face lies on one local side of every edge of Jf; its facial boundary walk traverses those edges once in cyclic order and no other edge, because its frontier is exactly Jf. Therefore the facial boundary walk is that graph cycle. The same induction covers every face, including the unbounded one.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources