How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A finite graph on at least vertices is -connected if and only if every two vertices have internally disjoint paths
Statement
Let and let be a finite graph on at least vertices. Then is -connected, meaning it is connected and , if and only if every two distinct vertices of are joined by at least internally vertex-disjoint paths.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite graph , an integer , and .
For nonadjacent terminals, finite vertex Menger equates the largest internally disjoint path family with the smallest vertex separator (Menger's theorem: the finite directed and undirected arc, edge and nonadjacent-vertex forms).
For a connected graph on at least two vertices, vertex connectivity is the minimum size of a set whose deletion disconnects the graph or leaves at most one vertex (Vertex cuts, edge cuts, vertex connectivity and edge connectivity , with conventions for complete and one-vertex graphs).
The open neighbourhood is the set of neighbours of , and its size is the degree of (Adjacency, incidence, open and closed neighbourhoods, vertex degree, minimum degree and maximum degree).
Proof
Suppose is -connected and are nonadjacent. Every - separator has at least vertices by [F1], so [L1] gives internally disjoint - paths.
Suppose instead that is an edge and that separates from in with . If the -component of contains a vertex other than , deleting disconnects that vertex from , contrary to [F1].
If that -component is the singleton , then , so ; deleting leaves the isolated and another vertex because , again contradicting [F1].
Thus every - separator in has size at least . By [L1], contains internally disjoint - paths, and adjoining gives such paths in .
Conversely, suppose every pair has internally disjoint paths. If and , at most of those paths have an internal vertex in , so one survives in ; as at least two vertices survive, no such is a vertex cut.
Taking in step 1.5 gives connectivity, and then [F1] makes the absence of cuts of size below exactly ; steps 1.1--1.4 prove the converse direction.
Depends on
- Menger's theorem: the finite directed and undirected arc, edge and nonadjacent-vertex forms
- Vertex cuts, edge cuts, vertex connectivity $\kappa(G)$ and edge connectivity $\lambda(G)$, with conventions for complete and one-vertex graphs
- Vertex and edge deletion, edge contraction, graph minors, subdivisions and topological minors
- Adjacency, incidence, open and closed neighbourhoods, vertex degree, minimum degree and maximum degree
Used by
- Every edge-maximal graph of order at least four with no subdivision of K₅ or K_3,3 is three-connected Lemma
- Every three-connected graph with no K₅ or K_3,3 minor is planar Lemma
- Every three-connected simple graph with more than four vertices has an edge whose simple contraction remains three-connected Lemma
- Every face of a two-connected plane graph is bounded by a cycle Proposition
- In a three-connected plane graph, face boundaries are exactly the induced cycles whose deletion leaves the graph connected Proposition
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 30 results over 15 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Whitman College, Menger's theorem and connectivity (standard reference, not scraped)