Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A finite graph on at least k+1 vertices is k-connected if and only if every two vertices have k internally disjoint paths

Statement

Let k≥1 and let G be a finite graph on at least k+1 vertices. Then G is k-connected, meaning it is connected and κ(G)≥k, if and only if every two distinct vertices of G are joined by at least k internally vertex-disjoint paths.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite graph G, an integer k≥1, and ∣V(G)∣≥k+1.

[L1]

For nonadjacent terminals, finite vertex Menger equates the largest internally disjoint path family with the smallest vertex separator (Menger's theorem: the finite directed and undirected arc, edge and nonadjacent-vertex forms).

[F1]

For a connected graph on at least two vertices, vertex connectivity is the minimum size of a set whose deletion disconnects the graph or leaves at most one vertex (Vertex cuts, edge cuts, vertex connectivity κ(G) and edge connectivity λ(G), with conventions for complete and one-vertex graphs).

[F2]

The open neighbourhood NG(x) is the set of neighbours of x, and its size is the degree of x (Adjacency, incidence, open and closed neighbourhoods, vertex degree, minimum degree and maximum degree).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Suppose G is k-connected and x,y are nonadjacent. Every x-y separator has at least k vertices by [F1], so [L1] gives k internally disjoint x-y paths.

L1F1
1.2

Suppose instead that xy is an edge and that S separates x from y in G−xy with ∣S∣≤k−2. If the x-component of (G−xy)−S contains a vertex other than x, deleting S∪{x} disconnects that vertex from y, contrary to [F1].

F1
1.3

If that x-component is the singleton {x}, then NG(x)⊆S∪{y}, so ∣NG(x)∣≤k−1; deleting NG(x) leaves the isolated x and another vertex because ∣V(G)∣≥k+1, again contradicting [F1].

F1F2
1.4

Thus every x-y separator in G−xy has size at least k−1. By [L1], G−xy contains k−1 internally disjoint x-y paths, and adjoining xy gives k such paths in G.

L1
1.5

Conversely, suppose every pair has k internally disjoint paths. If ∣S∣<k and x,y∉S, at most ∣S∣ of those paths have an internal vertex in S, so one survives in G−S; as at least two vertices survive, no such S is a vertex cut.

F1
2.1

Taking S=∅ in step 1.5 gives connectivity, and then [F1] makes the absence of cuts of size below k exactly κ(G)≥k; steps 1.1--1.4 prove the converse direction.

F1step 1.1step 1.4step 1.5∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources