Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A finite graph on at least k+1k+1 vertices is kk-connected if and only if every two vertices have kk internally disjoint paths

Statement

Let k1k\ge1 and let GG be a finite graph on at least k+1k+1 vertices. Then GG is kk-connected, meaning it is connected and κ(G)k\kappa(G)\ge k, if and only if every two distinct vertices of GG are joined by at least kk internally vertex-disjoint paths.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite graph GG, an integer k1k\ge1, and V(G)k+1|V(G)|\ge k+1.

[L1]

For nonadjacent terminals, finite vertex Menger equates the largest internally disjoint path family with the smallest vertex separator (Menger's theorem: the finite directed and undirected arc, edge and nonadjacent-vertex forms).

[F1]

For a connected graph on at least two vertices, vertex connectivity is the minimum size of a set whose deletion disconnects the graph or leaves at most one vertex (Vertex cuts, edge cuts, vertex connectivity κ(G)\kappa(G) and edge connectivity λ(G)\lambda(G), with conventions for complete and one-vertex graphs).

[F2]

The open neighbourhood NG(x)N_G(x) is the set of neighbours of xx, and its size is the degree of xx (Adjacency, incidence, open and closed neighbourhoods, vertex degree, minimum degree and maximum degree).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Suppose GG is kk-connected and x,yx,y are nonadjacent. Every xx-yy separator has at least kk vertices by [F1], so [L1] gives kk internally disjoint xx-yy paths.

L1F1
1.2

Suppose instead that xyxy is an edge and that SS separates xx from yy in GxyG-xy with Sk2|S|\le k-2. If the xx-component of (Gxy)S(G-xy)-S contains a vertex other than xx, deleting S{x}S\cup\{x\} disconnects that vertex from yy, contrary to [F1].

F1
1.3

If that xx-component is the singleton {x}\{x\}, then NG(x)S{y}N_G(x)\subseteq S\cup\{y\}, so NG(x)k1|N_G(x)|\le k-1; deleting NG(x)N_G(x) leaves the isolated xx and another vertex because V(G)k+1|V(G)|\ge k+1, again contradicting [F1].

F1F2
1.4

Thus every xx-yy separator in GxyG-xy has size at least k1k-1. By [L1], GxyG-xy contains k1k-1 internally disjoint xx-yy paths, and adjoining xyxy gives kk such paths in GG.

L1
1.5

Conversely, suppose every pair has kk internally disjoint paths. If S<k|S|<k and x,ySx,y\notin S, at most S|S| of those paths have an internal vertex in SS, so one survives in GSG-S; as at least two vertices survive, no such SS is a vertex cut.

F1
2.1

Taking S=S=\varnothing in step 1.5 gives connectivity, and then [F1] makes the absence of cuts of size below kk exactly κ(G)k\kappa(G)\ge k; steps 1.1--1.4 prove the converse direction.

F1step 1.1step 1.4step 1.5

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 30 results over 15 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources