Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-29
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Euler's formula ∣V∣−∣E∣+∣F∣=2 for every connected plane graph

Statement

If a connected plane graph has vertex, edge and face sets V,E,F (Plane embeddings of finite simple graphs, their faces, facial boundary walks and lengths (counting a bridge twice), and planar graphs), then

∣V∣−∣E∣+∣F∣=2.

Deletion is as in Vertex and edge deletion, edge contraction, graph minors, subdivisions and topological minors, the tree boundary case uses Every plane forest has exactly one face, and the finite induction is The principle of mathematical induction.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A connected plane graph G.

[L1]

A finite graph is connected if and only if it has a spanning tree (A finite graph is connected if and only if it has a spanning tree).

[L2]
[L3]

A polygonally embedded finite forest has one face; for a connected tree ∣V∣−∣E∣=1 (Every plane forest has exactly one face, For every forest, ∣V∣=∣E∣+c, where c is the number of connected components).

Proof

technique · induction
1.1baseL1L3

Choose a spanning tree T by [L1]. It has all ∣V∣ vertices, ∣V∣−1 edges, and exactly one face by [L3]. Thus ∣V∣−∣E(T)∣+∣F(T)∣=∣V∣−(∣V∣−1)+1=2.

1.2L2

We prove the exact face correspondence for deleting a cycle edge e from a connected plane graph H. Let X be its drawing, let e∘ be the edge arc without its endpoints, and put Ω=R2∖(X∖e∘), the complement after deleting e. By [L2], precisely two distinct old faces F1,F2 meet the two local sides of e∘. Put R=F1∪e∘∪F2. This is connected: each Fi is connected and has every point of the connected arc e∘ in its closure. It is open in Ω: for any point of e∘, a sufficiently small disk avoids X∖e∘, and its two sides of the local straight piece, or of the two adjacent pieces at a bend, lie in F1,F2 respectively. Openness at points of the faces is immediate. Every other old face F′ is connected and open in Ω; its frontier misses e∘ by [L2] and is contained in X∖e∘, so F′ is also closed in Ω. Now Ω is the disjoint union of R and all these other old faces. The complement of R is open, so R is closed in Ω as well. These connected open-and-closed pieces are exactly the new faces: F1,F2 merge into R, while every other old face remains distinct. Consequently deleting e decreases both the edge count and the face count by one, leaving the vertex count fixed.

2.1ihstep 1.2L1

Starting from G, delete the finitely many edges of E(G)∖E(T) one by one. At every stage T remains, so the current graph is connected. Each edge e to be deleted joins vertices already linked by a path in T and hence lies on a cycle of the current graph; step 1.2 applies. Each deletion lowers ∣E∣ and ∣F∣ by one without changing ∣V∣, so the Euler expression stays constant throughout the finite induction.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1discharge-induction∎

The final drawing is T, whose Euler expression equals 2 by step 1.1. The invariant from step 2.1 therefore gives ∣V(G)∣−∣E(G)∣+∣F(G)∣=2 for the original connected plane graph.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources