Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-11
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The parity of transverse ray crossings with a polygon is locally constant on its complement

Statement

For a polygon PP (Polygonal arcs and polygons as non-self-intersecting finite unions of line segments in R2\mathbb R^2) and xPx\notin P, count the intersections modulo two of any general-position ray supplied by Every point off a polygon admits a ray meeting it transversely in finitely many nonvertex points. This parity is independent of the chosen general-position ray and is constant throughout some open neighbourhood of xx in the complement. Consequently it is constant on every region of R2P\mathbb R^2\setminus P (Regions of the complement of a planar set and their frontiers). The elementary alternation at successive transverse crossings follows the convention of The even and odd index maps and the alternating sequence: strictly increasing e,oe, o with N\mathbb{N} their disjoint union, and the unique (sk)(s_k) with s0=1s_0 = 1, sσ(k)=sks_{\sigma(k)} = -s_k, which satisfies sk=1|s_k| = 1, se1s \circ e \equiv 1 and so1s \circ o \equiv -1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A polygon PP and a point xPx\notin P.

[L1]

Every point off a polygon admits a ray meeting it transversely in finitely many nonvertex points (Every point off a polygon admits a ray meeting it transversely in finitely many nonvertex points).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Fix a general-position ray from xx. The finite intersection points have positive distance from every polygon vertex and from every nonincident edge; transversality also supplies a positive angle at each crossing. Taking the minimum of finitely many positive tolerances gives a ball about xx in which parallel translated rays retain exactly these crossings.

L1
1.2

Rotate one general-position ray continuously to another, avoiding the finitely many exceptional directions except at isolated parameters. Crossing an edge tangentially creates or destroys two intersections, while passing a polygon vertex transfers the intersection from one incident edge to the other or changes the count by two. Thus the count modulo two never changes, so parity is independent of the chosen ray.

L1
2.1

Steps 1.1 and 1.2 make parity locally constant on the complement. A locally constant map to the discrete set {0,1}\{0,1\} is constant on each connected component, hence on each complementary region.

step 1.1step 1.2

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 93 results over 20 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources