Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-26
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Rooted plane trees satisfy T(x)=x/(1−T(x))

Statement

Let T(x) be the generating function of rooted plane trees, specified by

T=Z×SEQ⁡(T).

Then T(x) is the unique formal power series with zero constant coefficient satisfying

T(x)=x1−T(x).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The recursive specification T=Z×SEQ⁡(T).

[L1]

If A has no size-zero objects then SEQ⁡(A) has generating function 1/(1−A(x)) (If A has no size-zero objects then SEQ⁡(A) has generating function 1/(1−A(x))).

[L2]

Every x-adically Cauchy sequence in Z⟦x⟧ has a unique x-adic limit (R⟦x⟧ is complete in the x-adic topology and R[x] is dense by truncation).

[L4]

The atomic class Z has generating function x, and every object of Z has size 1 (The neutral class E and the atomic class Z).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L3algebra

On the set xZ⟦x⟧ of series with zero constant coefficient, define F(Y)=x/(1−Y). This is well defined because 1−Y has constant coefficient 1. For U,V in this set, F(U)−F(V)=x(U−V)/((1−U)(1−V)); both denominators are units of order 0, so [L3] gives ord⁡x(F(U)−F(V))≥ord⁡x(U−V)+1. Moreover F(Y) again has zero constant coefficient.

1.2givenL4

Every object of T has a root from the atomic class Z, so every tree has size at least 1. Thus T has no size-zero objects.

2.1step 1.1L2L3choose

Define T0:=0 and Tj+1:=F(Tj). Step 1.1 gives ord⁡x(Tj+1−Tj)≥j by induction on j, and [L3] then shows that (Tj) is x-adically Cauchy. By [L2] it has an x-adic limit T, whose constant coefficient is 0.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1L2

Step 1.1 also gives F(Tj)→F(T). Since F(Tj)=Tj+1 and the shifted sequence has the same limit T, uniqueness of limits from [L2] yields F(T)=T.

4.1step 1.1step 3.1assume-contradischarge-contradiction

If U,V∈xZ⟦x⟧ are distinct fixed points and p:=ord⁡x(U−V), then step 1.1 gives p=ord⁡x(F(U)−F(V))≥p+1, a contradiction. Thus T is the unique zero-constant fixed point.

5.1step 1.2step 4.1L1L4∎

Applying [L1] to SEQ⁡(T) and using [L4] for the root factor shows that SEQ⁡(T) has generating function 1/(1−T(x)), while Z contributes x. Therefore the defining equation of T reads T(x)=x/(1−T(x)), and step 4.1 gives the asserted uniqueness in the zero-constant class.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources