Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Power sums are orthogonal for the Hall form

Statement

Extend the Hall form ⟨ , ⟩H on Λ Q-bilinearly to ΛQ:=Q⊗ZΛ. For partitions λ and μ, let zλ:=∏r≥1rmr(λ)mr(λ)!,mr(λ):=#{i:λi=r}. Then ⟨pλ,pμ⟩H=δλμzλ. In particular, power sums of unequal degrees are orthogonal.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The graded Hall form, its dual complete and monomial bases, the power-sum and complete–monomial Cauchy expansions, and the rational power-sum basis.

[F1]

The Hall form is graded and satisfies ⟨hα,mβ⟩H=δαβ for partitions α,β; its degreewise restriction extends to a Q-bilinear form on each ΛQd (The Hall inner product on symmetric functions).

[F2]

For the Cauchy kernel, each diagonal bidegree component has both expansions Ωd=∑ν⊢dhν(x)mν(y) and Ωd=∑ν⊢dzν−1pν(x)pν(y) in the rational tensor product (Power-sum, complete, and Schur expansions of the Cauchy kernel).

[F3]

For each d≥0, {pν:ν⊢d} is a Q-basis of ΛQd (Power sums form a rational but not integral stable basis).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F2algebra

Fix d≥0, whose partition set is finite, and let V=ΛQd; the Hall form extends to V by scalar extension. Let (ui) and (vi) be any two bases and write ui=∑αaiαhα and vj=∑βbjβmβ using the dual bases from [F1]. With A=(aiα) and B=(bjβ), [F1] gives ⟨ui,vj⟩H=(ABT)ij, while the coefficient of hα⊗mβ in ∑iui(x)vi(y) is (ATB)αβ. If this tensor equals the complete–monomial kernel ∑α⊢dhα(x)mα(y) from [F2], then ATB=I; invertibility yields B=(AT)−1 and ABT=I, hence ⟨ui,vj⟩H=δij. This finite dual-kernel criterion makes no symmetry assumption on the Hall form.

2.1F1F2F3step 1.1algebra

By [F3], uν=pν is a basis of V. A partition has finitely many parts, so only finitely many mr(ν) are nonzero; thus zν is a positive integer and vν=pν/zν is also a basis. The power-sum expansion in [F2] is Ωd=∑ν⊢duν(x)vν(y), so step 1.1 gives ⟨pλ,pμ/zμ⟩H=δλμ. Bilinearity yields ⟨pλ,pμ⟩H=zμδλμ, which equals zλ on the diagonal and zero off it. For d=0, p∅=1, z∅=1, and ⟨1,1⟩H=1; for the one-part partition (r), z(r)=r and ⟨pr,pr⟩H=r.

3.1F1algebra∎

If ∣λ∣≠∣μ∣, the graded definition in [F1] gives ⟨pλ,pμ⟩H=0, and bilinearity makes a zero input pair to zero. Each fixed degree has finitely many partitions, and the proof uses finite basis changes and sums; no arbitrary choices are made and the axiom of choice is not used.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources