Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Hp equals Lp with equivalent norms for 1<p<∞

Statement

Assume Countable Choice and the ultrafilter lemma used in the Hp⊆Lp part of the proof. Let n≥1 and 1<p<∞, and fix an admissible kernel φ∈S(Rn) with ∫φ≠0 as in The real Hardy space Hp defined by a radial maximal function. Then f∈Hp(Rn) if and only if f is (represented by) a function of Lp(Rn), the two classes coincide, and ∥f∥Hp≤C1∥f∥Lp,∥f∥Lp≤C2∥f∥Hp,f∈Hp, with constants depending on n,p, finitely many Schwartz seminorms of φ, and ∣∫φ∣−1. One may take C2=∣∫φ∣−1. The proof of the inclusion Hp⊆Lp assumes the ultrafilter lemma (a consequence of the Axiom of Choice, The Axiom of Choice) through the weak-star sequential compactness of the dual ball; the inclusion Lp⊆Hp is choice-free beyond the published maximal-function machinery. In particular the scale Hp is new only for 0<p≤1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice and the ultrafilter lemma, n≥1, 1<p<∞, an admissible kernel φ, and f∈S′.

[F2]

If 0≤Φ∈L1(Rn) is radially nonincreasing, then the associated maximal operator is dominated by the centered Hardy-Littlewood maximal operator: (Φ∗∣u∣)(x)≤∥Φ∥1Mu(x) (Radially decreasing kernels are dominated by the maximal function).

[F3]

The centered Hardy-Littlewood maximal operator satisfies the strong Lp bound ∥Mu∥Lp≤Cn,p∥u∥Lp, 1<p<∞ (The centered maximal operator is bounded on Lp(Rn) for 1<p<∞, The centered and uncentered Hardy-Littlewood maximal functions).

[F4]

Let pα,0(φ)=sup⁡x∣xαφ(x)∣ be the Schwartz seminorms of Schwartz space and its seminorms, and set Cφ:=2n(1+n)n+1(p0,0(φ)+∑i=1np(n+1)ei,0(φ))<∞. Since ∣x∣≤nmax⁡i∣xi∣, the elementary inequality (1+r)n+1≤2n(1+rn+1) shows (1+∣x∣)n+1∣φ(x)∣≤Cφ. Thus G(x):=Cφ(1+∣x∣)−n−1 is a radially nonincreasing integrable pointwise majorant of ∣φ∣. If u∈Lp, then ∣(u∗φt)(x)∣≤(∣u∣∗∣φ∣t)(x); normalised dilations Gt are radially nonincreasing with ∥Gt∥1=∥G∥1, so ∣u∣∗∣φ∣t≤∣u∣∗Gt≤∥G∥1Mu (Radially decreasing kernels are dominated by the maximal function).

[F5]

For 1<p<∞ complex Lp is the dual of complex Lp′ by Complex Lp duality from real Lp duality. Separability first applies to the Borel restriction: rational boxes countably generate it (For n at least one, open sets, closed sets, compact sets, open balls, boxes, rational open boxes, and rational half-open boxes generate the Borel sigma-algebra on R^n), and bounded cubes give sigma-finiteness. Completion does not change Lp′: L(Rn) is exactly the completion of the restriction of λn to the Borel sets replaces each measurable set in a sequence of simple approximants by a Borel set modulo a null set; the countable union of these exceptions is null, yielding a Borel representative. Separability on the Borel restriction therefore gives separability of Lebesgue Lp′; hence the unit ball of Lp is weak-star sequentially compact, the weak-star topology on norm-bounded sets is metrised by a countable dense set, and the dual norm is weak-star lower semicontinuous (For 1<p<∞, the same representation theorem holds on arbitrary measure spaces, If μ is sigma-finite and A is countably generated, then Lp(μ) is separable for 1≤p<∞, A separable predual has weak-star sequentially compact dual ball, Conjugate exponents, including the endpoint conventions).

Proof technique: direct domination by the Hardy-Littlewood maximal function, then weak-star sequential compactness for the reverse inclusion.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F2F3F4algebra

Lp⊂Hp. Let f∈Lp and use the radially nonincreasing integrable majorant G from [F4]. For every t>0 the normalised kernel Gt is again radially nonincreasing with ∥Gt∥1=∥G∥1, and ∣f∗φt∣≤∣f∣∗∣φ∣t≤∣f∣∗Gt≤∥G∥1Mf pointwise by [F2]. Hence Mφ0f≤∥G∥1Mf, and [F3] gives ∥f∥Hp=∥Mφ0f∥Lp≤∥G∥1Cn,p∥f∥Lp, so f∈Hp with the stated bound.

1.2F5givenalgebra

Hp⊂Lp. Let f∈Hp and set Φ=φ/∫φ. Then ∫Φ=1 and MΦ0f=∣∫φ∣−1Mφ0f∈Lp exactly by linearity. The functions ut=f∗Φt, 0<t<1, satisfy ∣ut∣≤MΦ0f pointwise, hence form a bounded family in Lp. By Schwartz approximate identities converge in the sense of tempered distributions, ut→f in S′ as t↓0: for ψ∈S, ⟨ut,ψ⟩=⟨f,Φˇt∗ψ⟩→⟨f,ψ⟩. The space Lp′ is separable for 1<p<∞, so the unit ball of its dual Lp is weak-star sequentially compact, and the bounded sequence utk over a fixed sequence tk↓0 has a subsequence (utkℓ) converging weak-star to some v∈Lp. By weak-star lower semicontinuity of the norm, ∥v∥Lp≤lim inf⁡ℓ∥utkℓ∥Lp≤∥MΦ0f∥Lp≤∣∫φ∣−1∥f∥Hp. For every ψ∈S⊂Lp′ one has ⟨v,ψ⟩=lim⁡ℓ⟨utkℓ,ψ⟩=⟨f,ψ⟩, since ut→f in S′; since equality of tempered distributions is tested against S, the distribution f is represented by the Lp function v. Hence f∈Lp with ∥f∥Lp≤∣∫φ∣−1∥f∥Hp.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2∎

Conclusion. Steps 1.1 and 1.2 show that Hp and Lp have the same elements and equivalent (quasi-)norms for 1<p<∞.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

98 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources