How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Relative homology vanishes exactly for quasi-isomorphisms
Statement
For a chain map , the following are equivalent:
- is a quasi-isomorphism.
- for every .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A chain map .
Relative homology is the homology of the mapping cone (The relative homology of a chain map).
A chain map is a quasi-isomorphism exactly when its cone is acyclic (A chain map is a quasi-isomorphism exactly when its cone is acyclic).
Acyclic means vanishing homology in every degree (Exactness of a complex at a degree and acyclic complexes).
Proof
By [L1], the condition for all is exactly the condition that all homology objects of vanish.
By [L3], vanishing of all homology objects means that is acyclic, and then [L2] identifies this with being a quasi-isomorphism. This proves both directions of the equivalence.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Charles A. Weibel, Chapter 1 of An Introduction to Homological Algebra (standard reference, not scraped)