Alphabeta Math
False statementConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-31
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

FALSE: the mapping-cone differential needs no minus sign

Statement

The mapping-cone differential still squares to zero if one removes the minus sign from the shifted summand.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The identity map 1C on the two-term complex 0Z1Z0, placed in degrees 1 and 0.

[A1]

The statement refuted is: the mapping-cone differential still squares to zero if one removes the minus sign from the shifted summand.

[L1]

With the minus sign present, the mapping-cone differential squares to zero (The mapping-cone differential squares to zero).

[L2]

The actual cone differential is d(y,x)=(d(y)+f(x),d(x)) (The mapping cone of a chain map).

Refutation

technique · direct
1.1

Let x=1 be the generator of the copy of Z in C1. If the minus sign were removed, then for the displayed identity map the modified square on (0,x) would have first component dC(x)+dC(x)=2dC(x)=20 in the copy of Z in degree 0. So the modified differential does not square to zero on this cone.

A1givenalgebra
2.1

This contradicts the claim in [A1]. The actual definition [L2] and the verified lemma [L1] show that the minus sign is exactly what cancels the mixed terms.

A1L1L2step 1.1algebra

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources