How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Rings of integers are Dedekind domains
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. The ring of integers of every number field is a Dedekind domain.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice and a number field .
The integers form a commutative ring with and no zero divisors, so they are an integral domain; the natural-number embedding into is injective and its image is the nonnegative integers (The integers form a commutative ring, The naturals embed in the integers, The integers have no zero divisors; multiplicative cancellation, Zero divisor, and integral domain: a commutative ring with and no zero divisors).
Every additive subgroup of is for a unique , with the generator positive when the subgroup is nonzero (Every subgroup of is for exactly one natural number ).
A rational number integral over is an integer (The rational algebraic integers are exactly the integers).
A number field is a finite extension of (Number field, The degree of a finite field extension).
Every field of characteristic zero is perfect (Fields of characteristic zero, finite fields, and algebraically closed fields are perfect).
Every algebraic extension of a perfect field is separable (Every algebraic extension of a perfect field is separable).
A Dedekind domain is a Noetherian integrally closed domain of Krull dimension (Dedekind domains).
Assuming the Axiom of Choice, the integral closure of a Dedekind domain in a finite separable extension of its fraction field is Dedekind (The Axiom of Choice, The integral closure of a Dedekind domain in a finite separable extension is Dedekind).
The ring of integers is the integral closure of in (Ring of integers).
The rationals are classes with and ; the canonical map is an injective ring map, is a field, and the fraction-field construction uses the localization relation for some nonzero (The rationals as equivalence classes of pairs of integers, The integers embed in the rationals, The rationals form a field, The field of fractions of an integral domain, Multiplicative subsets and the localisation as equivalence classes of fractions).
A module is Noetherian when all its submodules are finitely generated, and a ring is Noetherian when its left regular module is Noetherian (Noetherian modules: every submodule is finitely generated, Left and right Noetherian rings).
A domain is integrally closed when every element of its fraction field integral over it lies in the domain (Integral closure in an extension ring and integrally closed domains).
A prime ideal is proper and absorbs factors of products; means ; for , the Euclid property characterizes prime integers (Prime ideals and maximal ideals in a commutative ring, Divisibility in : when for some integer , For an integer : is prime if and only if, for all integers and , implies or ).
For a prime integer , is a field and is the quotient ring ; a quotient by an ideal is a field exactly when the ideal is maximal (For every prime , the two operations on make it a field, For every , the congruence-class ring is the quotient ring , is a field if and only if is a maximal ideal).
If and , then ; if , then (the integer-discreteness argument in the proof of If and then and ; hence the set of divisors of a nonzero integer is bounded above by ). For nonnegative , ; the integer order is antisymmetric and compatible with addition (If and then and ; hence the set of divisors of a nonzero integer is bounded above by , Absolute value in : ; exactly when ; ; ; ; and exactly when , The integers form a totally ordered ring, Order on the integers).
The natural embedding preserves order; the natural numerals satisfy , since , , and each successor is the immediate successor (The naturals embed in the integers, Discreteness: is the immediate successor, The natural numbers (von Neumann)).
By definition, an integer is prime exactly when and every positive divisor of is or (Prime and composite integers: is prime when and its only positive divisors are and ).
Every maximal ideal in a commutative ring is prime (Every maximal ideal of a commutative ring is prime).
Krull dimension is the supremum of the lengths of strict chains of prime ideals (Krull dimension of a nonzero ring).
Proof
By [F1], is a domain. A fraction equals in exactly when for some nonzero ; the domain property makes this equivalent to , the relation defining . The operations agree under , so this gives the canonical identification .
Let be an ideal of . It is an additive subgroup, so [F2] gives for some ; as a -module, is generated by that one element, including when . Every submodule of the left regular module is such an ideal. Therefore this module is Noetherian, and is a Noetherian ring by [F11].
The field has characteristic zero: for every positive integer , by the injectivity in [F10]. By [F5], is perfect.
Let be a nonzero prime ideal of . By [F2], for a positive integer ; since is proper, , so . If , then , and [F13] gives or , so or . The Euclid-property characterization therefore makes a prime integer.
If is integral over , step 1.1 identifies it with a rational number, and [F3] gives . Hence is integrally closed by [F12].
Put , which is finite and at least by [F4] and because is a field extension of . For each , the vectors in the -dimensional -vector space are linearly dependent, so a nonzero polynomial over vanishes at . Thus is algebraic; [F6] and step 1.3 make it separable.
For the prime from step 1.4, [F14] makes a field and identifies it with the quotient ring . The quotient criterion in [F14] then makes every nonzero prime ideal of maximal.
First, [F16] gives , so . If is any positive divisor of , [F15] gives . If , then ; translation compatibility of the order gives , and integer discreteness in [F15] gives . Hence , so antisymmetry and give . Thus the only positive divisors of are and , and [F17] proves that is prime. Now [F14] makes maximal, and [F18] makes it prime. Since is a domain, is prime; and by [F16], so . Every prime chain with positive length starts at and has length at most , because each nonzero prime is maximal by step 2.3. Thus [F19] gives .
Steps 1.1, 1.2, 2.1, and 3.1 show that is a Noetherian integrally closed domain of dimension . Hence [F7] makes a Dedekind domain.
By [F9], is the integral closure of in . Apply [F8] with , fraction field from step 1.1, and finite separable extension from step 2.2. Under the given Axiom of Choice, this proves that is Dedekind.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- Number field
- The degree $[K:F]=\dim_F K$ of a finite field extension
- Ring of integers
- Dedekind domains
- The integral closure of a Dedekind domain in a finite separable extension is Dedekind
- Every subgroup of $(\mathbb{Z}, +)$ is $\langle n \rangle = n\mathbb{Z}$ for exactly one natural number $n$
- The integers form a commutative ring
- The naturals embed in the integers
- The integers have no zero divisors; multiplicative cancellation
- Zero divisor, and integral domain: a commutative ring with $1 \ne 0$ and no zero divisors
- Left and right Noetherian rings
- Noetherian modules: every submodule is finitely generated
- The rational algebraic integers are exactly the integers
- Integral closure in an extension ring and integrally closed domains
- The rationals as equivalence classes of pairs of integers
- The rationals form a field
- The integers embed in the rationals
- The field of fractions $\operatorname{Frac}(D)=(D\setminus\{0\})^{-1}D$ of an integral domain
- Multiplicative subsets and the localisation $S^{-1}R$ as equivalence classes of fractions
- Fields of characteristic zero, finite fields, and algebraically closed fields are perfect
- Every algebraic extension of a perfect field is separable
- Prime ideals and maximal ideals in a commutative ring
- Divisibility in $\mathbb{Z}$: $d \mid a$ when $a = dq$ for some integer $q$
- For an integer $p > 1$: $p$ is prime if and only if, for all integers $a$ and $b$, $p \mid ab$ implies $p \mid a$ or $p \mid b$
- For every prime $p$, the two operations on $\mathbb{Z}/p$ make it a field
- For every $n\in\mathbb N$, the congruence-class ring $\mathbb Z/n$ is the quotient ring $\mathbb Z/n\mathbb Z$
- $R/M$ is a field if and only if $M$ is a maximal ideal
- Prime and composite integers: $p$ is prime when $p > 1$ and its only positive divisors are $1$ and $p$
- Every maximal ideal of a commutative ring is prime
- Krull dimension of a nonzero ring
- If $d \mid a$ and $a \ne 0$ then $d \ne 0$ and $|d| \le |a|$; hence the set of divisors of a nonzero integer is bounded above by $|a|$
- Absolute value in $\mathbb{Z}$: $|a| \ge 0$; $|a| = 0$ exactly when $a = 0$; $|-a| = |a|$; $|ab| = |a|\,|b|$; $-|a| \le a \le |a|$; and $|a| \le c$ exactly when $-c \le a \le c$
- The integers form a totally ordered ring
- Order on the integers
- Discreteness: $\sigma(n)$ is the immediate successor
- The natural numbers $\mathbb{N}$ (von Neumann)
Used by
- Class group generated by small prime ideals Corollary
- Every nontrivial number field has a ramified finite prime Corollary
- Minkowski bound for Gaussian integers Example
- S-units of Q Example
- Good reduction is stable under base change of the base Lemma
- Minkowski bound for ideal classes Theorem
- Number field places classification Theorem
- Product formula for a number field Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
116 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Milne, Theorem 3.1 (standard reference, not scraped)