Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-10-01
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Rings of integers are Dedekind domains

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. The ring of integers of every number field is a Dedekind domain.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice and a number field K.

[F1]

The integers form a commutative ring with 1≠0 and no zero divisors, so they are an integral domain; the natural-number embedding into Z is injective and its image is the nonnegative integers (The integers form a commutative ring, The naturals embed in the integers, The integers have no zero divisors; multiplicative cancellation, Zero divisor, and integral domain: a commutative ring with 1≠0 and no zero divisors).

[F2]

Every additive subgroup of Z is nZ for a unique n∈N, with the generator positive when the subgroup is nonzero (Every subgroup of (Z,+) is ⟨n⟩=nZ for exactly one natural number n).

[F3]

A rational number integral over Z is an integer (The rational algebraic integers are exactly the integers).

[F4]
[F6]

Every algebraic extension of a perfect field is separable (Every algebraic extension of a perfect field is separable).

[F7]

A Dedekind domain is a Noetherian integrally closed domain of Krull dimension 1 (Dedekind domains).

[F8]

Assuming the Axiom of Choice, the integral closure of a Dedekind domain in a finite separable extension of its fraction field is Dedekind (The Axiom of Choice, The integral closure of a Dedekind domain in a finite separable extension is Dedekind).

[F9]

The ring of integers OK is the integral closure of Z in K (Ring of integers).

[F10]

The rationals are classes [(a,b)] with a,b∈Z and b≠0; the canonical map j:Z→Q is an injective ring map, Q is a field, and the fraction-field construction uses the localization relation u(ad−cb)=0 for some nonzero u∈Z (The rationals as equivalence classes of pairs of integers, The integers embed in the rationals, The rationals form a field, The field of fractions Frac⁡(D)=(D∖{0})−1D of an integral domain, Multiplicative subsets and the localisation S−1R as equivalence classes of fractions).

[F11]

A module is Noetherian when all its submodules are finitely generated, and a ring is Noetherian when its left regular module is Noetherian (Noetherian modules: every submodule is finitely generated, Left and right Noetherian rings).

[F12]

A domain is integrally closed when every element of its fraction field integral over it lies in the domain (Integral closure in an extension ring and integrally closed domains).

[F13]
[F14]

For a prime integer p, Z/p is a field and is the quotient ring Z/pZ; a quotient by an ideal is a field exactly when the ideal is maximal (For every prime p, the two operations on Z/p make it a field, For every n∈N, the congruence-class ring Z/n is the quotient ring Z/nZ, R/M is a field if and only if M is a maximal ideal).

[F16]

The natural embedding preserves order; the natural numerals satisfy 0<1<2, since 1=σ(0), 2=σ(1), and each successor is the immediate successor (The naturals embed in the integers, Discreteness: σ(n) is the immediate successor, The natural numbers N (von Neumann)).

[F17]

By definition, an integer p is prime exactly when p>1 and every positive divisor of p is 1 or p (Prime and composite integers: p is prime when p>1 and its only positive divisors are 1 and p).

[F18]

Every maximal ideal in a commutative ring is prime (Every maximal ideal of a commutative ring is prime).

[F19]

Krull dimension is the supremum of the lengths of strict chains of prime ideals (Krull dimension of a nonzero ring).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F10algebra

By [F1], Z is a domain. A fraction a/b equals c/d in Frac⁡(Z) exactly when u(ad−cb)=0 for some nonzero u∈Z; the domain property makes this equivalent to ad=cb, the relation defining Q. The operations agree under (a,b)↦j(a)/j(b), so this gives the canonical identification Frac⁡(Z)=Q.

1.2F2F11algebra

Let I be an ideal of Z. It is an additive subgroup, so [F2] gives I=nZ for some n∈N; as a Z-module, I is generated by that one element, including when n=0. Every submodule of the left regular module Z is such an ideal. Therefore this module is Noetherian, and Z is a Noetherian ring by [F11].

1.3F5F10algebra

The field Q has characteristic zero: for every positive integer m, m⋅1Q=j(m)≠0 by the injectivity in [F10]. By [F5], Q is perfect.

1.4F2F13given

Let P be a nonzero prime ideal of Z. By [F2], P=pZ for a positive integer p; since P is proper, p≠1, so p>1. If p∣ab, then ab∈P, and [F13] gives a∈P or b∈P, so p∣a or p∣b. The Euclid-property characterization therefore makes p a prime integer.

2.1F3step 1.1F12

If x∈Frac⁡(Z) is integral over Z, step 1.1 identifies it with a rational number, and [F3] gives x∈Z. Hence Z is integrally closed by [F12].

2.2F4F6step 1.3algebra

Put n=[K:Q], which is finite and at least 1 by [F4] and because K is a field extension of Q. For each α∈K, the n+1 vectors 1,α,…,αn in the n-dimensional Q-vector space K are linearly dependent, so a nonzero polynomial over Q vanishes at α. Thus K/Q is algebraic; [F6] and step 1.3 make it separable.

2.3step 1.4F14

For the prime p from step 1.4, [F14] makes Z/p a field and identifies it with the quotient ring Z/pZ=Z/P. The quotient criterion in [F14] then makes every nonzero prime ideal of Z maximal.

3.1F1F14F15F16F17F18F19step 2.3algebra

First, [F16] gives 0<1<2, so 2>1. If d is any positive divisor of 2, [F15] gives 1≤d≤∣2∣=2. If d≠1, then 1<d; translation compatibility of the order gives 0<d−1, and integer discreteness in [F15] gives 1≤d−1. Hence 2≤d, so antisymmetry and d≤2 give d=2. Thus the only positive divisors of 2 are 1 and 2, and [F17] proves that 2 is prime. Now [F14] makes 2Z maximal, and [F18] makes it prime. Since Z is a domain, (0) is prime; and 2≠0 by [F16], so (0)⊊2Z. Every prime chain with positive length starts at (0) and has length at most 1, because each nonzero prime is maximal by step 2.3. Thus [F19] gives dim⁡Z=1.

4.1F1F7step 1.2step 2.1step 3.1

Steps 1.1, 1.2, 2.1, and 3.1 show that Z is a Noetherian integrally closed domain of dimension 1. Hence [F7] makes Z a Dedekind domain.

5.1F8F9step 1.1step 2.2step 4.1given∎

By [F9], OK is the integral closure of Z in K. Apply [F8] with R=Z, fraction field Q=Frac⁡(Z) from step 1.1, and finite separable extension K/Q from step 2.2. Under the given Axiom of Choice, this proves that OK is Dedekind.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

116 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources