Alphabeta Math
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 2 results · all verified · 0 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 2 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Number Fields Rings of Integers and Discriminants

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

For a finite extension K/Q, this page separates its maximal order OK from arbitrary full-rank orders. Discriminants are first attached to ordered bases; the change-of-basis formula then makes the order and field invariants well defined. The embedding determinant always uses all [K:Q] embeddings.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Number field

Definition

A number field is a finite extension K/Q; write n=[K:Q].

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Ring of integers

Definition

For a number field K, its ring of integers is OK, the integral closure of Z in K. It is not an arbitrary order.

CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedaudited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Minimal-polynomial criterion for algebraic integers

Statement

For α∈K, α∈OK if and only if its monic minimal polynomial over Q lies in Z[X].

Facts & Assumptions

Given: α∈K.

[F1]

Integrality means satisfying a monic polynomial over the base ring (Integral ring maps and integral extensions).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1given

If the minimal polynomial is monic over Z, [F1] gives α∈OK.

2.1F1step 1.1∎

Conversely, a monic integral polynomial annihilating α is divisible by its monic minimal polynomial; Gauss's lemma makes the latter integral.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Clearing denominators for an algebraic number

Statement

For every α∈K, some positive integer m satisfies mα∈OK; hence K=Frac⁡(OK).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: α∈K.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenalgebra

Write the monic minimal polynomial of α as Xn+cn−1Xn−1+⋯+c0∈Q[X], and choose a positive common denominator m of the ci. Multiplying the equation for α by mn shows that mα satisfies Xn+(mcn−1)Xn−1+(m2cn−2)Xn−2+⋯+mnc0, a monic polynomial in Z[X].

2.1step 1.1∎

Thus mα∈OK, and α=(mα)/m lies in its fraction field; the reverse inclusion is contained in K.

CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Trace and norm of an algebraic integer

Statement

If α∈OK, then Tr⁡K/Q(α) and NK/Q(α) belong to Z.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: α∈OK.

[F1]

Trace and norm are the trace and determinant of multiplication (The norm NK/F and trace Tr⁡K/F of a finite field extension).

[F2]

The monic minimal polynomial of an algebraic integer has coefficients in Z (Minimal-polynomial criterion for algebraic integers).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F2given

Let f(X)=Xr+cr−1Xr−1+⋯+c0 be the minimal polynomial of α over Q. Fact [F2] gives cj∈Z.

2.1F1step 1.1algebra∎

Put h=[K:Q(α)]. Regarding K as a Q(α)-vector space, multiplication by α acts as the scalar α on each of h basis directions. Hence its characteristic polynomial over Q is f(X)h. By [F1], Tr⁡K/Q(α)=−hcr−1,NK/Q(α)=(−1)rhc0h, which are integers.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Order in a number field

Definition

An order in K is a unital subring O⊆OK whose additive group is free of rank [K:Q].

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Integral and power integral bases

Definition

Let O be an order in a number field K of degree n. An integral basis of O is an ordered Z-basis of O. A power integral basis of O is an integral basis of the form (1,α,…,αn−1); equivalently, O=Z[α]. In the special case O=OK, this says OK=Z[α], and then K is called monogenic. A power integral basis is extra structure, not an assumption on an arbitrary order or number field.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-10-01Open item page →

The ring of integers has rank the degree

Statement

OK is a free Z-module of rank [K:Q].

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A number field K.

[F1]

By definition, K/Q is a finite extension of degree [K:Q] (Number field).

[F2]

The trace of a∈K is the matrix trace of multiplication by a on the finite-dimensional Q-space K (The norm NK/F and trace Tr⁡K/F of a finite field extension).

[F3]

Every element of K has a positive integer multiple in OK (Clearing denominators for an algebraic number).

[F4]

The trace of an algebraic integer in a number field is an integer (Trace and norm of an algebraic integer).

[F5]

The integral elements over a nonzero base ring form a subring (Integral elements over a nonzero base ring form a subring).

[F6]

Every additive subgroup of Z is dZ for a unique d≥0, with d>0 the least positive member when the subgroup is nonzero (Every subgroup of (Z,+) is ⟨n⟩=nZ for exactly one natural number n).

[F7]

A square matrix over a field is invertible exactly when its kernel is zero, and then each right-hand side has a unique solution (Invertible matrix theorem: invertibility, full pivot rank, RREF I, trivial nullspace and unique solvability are equivalent).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1givenchoose

Put n=[K:Q] and choose a Q-basis e1,…,en of K. By [F1], K is an n-dimensional Q-vector space.

1.2F6given

We prove by induction on m≥0 that every additive subgroup H≤Zm has a finite Z-basis. For m=0, the zero subgroup has the empty basis. Now let m>0 and assume the assertion for m−1. Project H to its first coordinate. By [F6], the image is either {0} or dZ for some positive integer d.

2.1F2step 1.1algebra

Define B(x,y)=Tr⁡K/Q(xy). Multiplication in K gives m(ax+by)z=amxz+bmyz for a,b∈Q, and matrix trace is linear; the same holds in the second variable since K is commutative. Thus B is a bilinear form.

2.2F3F5step 1.1choose

For each i, [F3] gives a positive integer mi such that ui:=miei∈OK. These elements remain a Q-basis. Set M=∑i=1nZui. By [F5], M⊆OK.

2.3step 1.2choose

If the image is zero, H identifies with a subgroup of Zm−1 and has a finite basis by induction. If the image is dZ, its kernel H0 identifies with a subgroup of Zm−1 and has a finite basis k1,…,kr by induction. Choose one h∈H whose first coordinate is d.

3.1F2step 1.1step 2.1algebra

If x≠0, take y=x−1. Then B(x,y)=Tr⁡K/Q(1)=n, because multiplication by 1 is the identity on the n-dimensional space K. As n>0 in Q, this proves that the radical of B is zero.

3.2step 2.3algebra

In the nonzero-image case of step 2.3, every g∈H has first coordinate qd for some q∈Z, so g−qh∈H0; hence h,k1,…,kr span H. If ah+∑ibiki=0, its first coordinate gives ad=0, hence a=0, and the independence of the basis of H0 then gives every bi=0. Thus this spanning list is a basis. The induction uses only one lift for each fixed subgroup at this finite stage, not a choice of lifts for a family.

4.1F2F7step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1step 2.2algebra

Let A=(Tr⁡K/Q(uiuj))i,j. If Az=0 for z∈Qn, put x=∑jzjuj. Then Tr⁡K/Q(uix)=0 for every i, and bilinearity makes Tr⁡K/Q(yx)=0 for every y∈K, since the ui form a Q-basis. By step 3.1, x=0, so z=0. Thus A has zero kernel and [F7] makes it invertible.

5.1F7step 4.1algebra

For each j, solve Avj=εj over Q, where εj is the jth standard coordinate vector, and put uj∗=∑k(vj)kuk. By [F7], these solutions exist uniquely and satisfy Tr⁡K/Q(uiuj∗)=δij for every i,j.

6.1step 5.1choose

The coordinates of the finitely many uj∗ in the basis u1,…,un are rational. Choose a positive integer c clearing all their denominators. Then cuj∗∈M⊆OK for every j.

7.1F4F5step 6.1algebra

If x=∑iaiui∈OK, the trace-dual equations give caj=Tr⁡K/Q(x cuj∗). The product is integral by [F5], so [F4] makes this trace an integer. Thus every aj∈c−1Z, proving M⊆OK⊆c−1M.

8.1step 7.1step 1.2

Since u1/c,…,un/c is a Z-basis of c−1M≅Zn, the inclusion in step 7.1 identifies OK with an additive subgroup of Zn. By the induction, it has a finite Z-basis v1,…,vr.

9.1step 2.2step 8.1algebra∎

The vi span K over Q: their integral span contains M, which spans K. Their Z-independence implies Q-independence after clearing denominators. Thus they are a Q-basis and r=n=[K:Q]. This proves the claim.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Orders have integral bases and finite index

Statement

Every order has an integral basis and finite additive index in OK.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An order O⊆OK.

[F1]

OK is free of rank n (The ring of integers has rank the degree).

[F2]

Full-rank PID submodules admit simultaneous bases (Simultaneous bases for a submodule of a finite free module over a PID).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1given

The order has full rank by definition, so [F1] makes it a rank-n submodule of a free rank-n group.

2.1F2step 1.1∎

Apply [F2]: the quotient is a finite direct sum of Z/aiZ, and the resulting basis of O is integral.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Archimedean embeddings and signature

Definition

Let K be a number field. Let r1 be the number of field embeddings K→R that fix Q, and let r2 be the number of complex-conjugate pairs among the nonreal field embeddings K→C that fix Q. The signature of K is (r1,r2), with r1+2r2=[K:Q]. Embedding determinants use all of these real and nonreal embeddings.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Discriminant of a basis and order

Definition

For an ordered Q-basis α1,…,αn, set disc⁡(α1,…,αn)=det⁡(Tr⁡K/Q(αiαj))i,j. For an order O⊆K, define disc⁡(O) to be the discriminant of any integral basis of O. This is independent of the integral basis: the change matrix between two Z-bases is unimodular, and Change of basis for discriminants ↗ multiplies the discriminant by the square of its determinant, which is 1. Finally, dK:=disc⁡(OK); the existence of an integral basis of OK is supplied by The ring of integers has rank the degree.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Change of basis for discriminants

Statement

If βj=∑iaijαi, then disc⁡(β)=det⁡(A)2disc⁡(α).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Two ordered bases related by A=(aij).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenalgebra

Bilinearity of trace gives Gβ=AtGαA for the trace Gram matrices.

2.1step 1.1algebra∎

Taking determinants gives the asserted square factor.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Embedding determinant formula

Statement

Let σ1,…,σn be the n distinct embeddings K→C. For every ordered Q-basis α1,…,αn of K, disc⁡(α1,…,αn)=det⁡(σi(αj))2, and the determinant is nonzero.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An ordered basis of the number field.

[F1]

In a separable extension, trace is the sum over the embeddings (Norm and trace from embeddings, with the inseparable exponent in the norm formula).

[F2]

Distinct field embeddings are linearly independent as characters (Dedekind's linear independence theorem for distinct characters).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1given

With A=(σi(αj)), [F1] gives G=AtA for the trace Gram matrix.

1.2F2given

If A were singular, a nonzero linear combination of its rows would vanish on the basis and hence on every element of K, contradicting [F2]. Thus det⁡A≠0.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2algebra∎

Taking determinants in step 1.1 gives det⁡G=det⁡(A)2, and step 1.2 gives the asserted nonvanishing.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedaudited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Number-field discriminant is well-defined and nonzero

Statement

Integral bases give the same nonzero signed integer dK.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Two integral bases of OK.

[F1]

Change of basis squares its determinant (Change of basis for discriminants).

[F2]

The embedding determinant formula holds (Embedding determinant formula).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1given

The integral change matrix is unimodular, so [F1] gives basis independence; integral traces make the value integral.

2.1F2step 1.1∎

Distinct embeddings make the matrix in [F2] invertible, so its square is nonzero.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Power-basis and polynomial discriminants

Statement

Let K=Q(α). If f is the degree-n monic minimal polynomial of α, then disc⁡(1,α,…,αn−1)=(−1)n(n−1)/2NK/Q(f′(α))=disc⁡(f).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: K=Q(α) and deg⁡f=n.

[F1]

The basis discriminant is the square of its embedding determinant (Embedding determinant formula).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1given

Fact [F1] makes the determinant the Vandermonde product of the conjugates of α.

2.1step 1.1algebra∎

Squaring it and regrouping the root differences is the polynomial discriminant, equivalently the displayed derivative norm.

CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Order-index discriminant formula

Statement

For an order O⊆OK, disc⁡(O)=[OK:O]2dK.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An order O.

[F1]

Simultaneous bases exist with finite index (Orders have integral bases and finite index).

[F2]

Discriminants change by a determinant square (Change of basis for discriminants).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1given

Choose the bases from [F1]; the absolute change determinant is the index.

2.1F2step 1.1∎

Apply [F2] and square the determinant.

CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Squarefree power discriminant criterion

Statement

If integral α generates K and its power-basis discriminant is squarefree, then OK=Z[α].

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The stated integral generator.

[F1]

The index-discriminant formula holds (Order-index discriminant formula).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1given

The power order is an order, and [F1] says its discriminant is the square of its index times dK.

2.1step 1.1algebra∎

A square index dividing a squarefree integer is 1, so the two orders coincide.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Integers in a quadratic field

Statement

For squarefree d≠1, OQ(d)=Z[(1+d)/2] if d≡1(mod4), and Z[d] otherwise.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Squarefree d≠1.

[F1]

Integral elements have integral trace and norm (Trace and norm of an algebraic integer).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1given

Write an integral element as (a+bd)/c in lowest terms. Fact [F1] forces 2a/c,(a2−db2)/c2∈Z.

2.1step 1.1algebra∎

These divisibilities force c∣2; the c=2 case occurs exactly when d≡1(mod4), yielding the displayed bases.

CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Discriminant of a quadratic field

Statement

For squarefree d≠1, dK=d if d≡1(mod4), and dK=4d otherwise.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Squarefree d≠1.

[F1]

The integral bases are known (Integers in a quadratic field).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1given

In each basis of [F1], form the 2×2 trace Gram matrix.

2.1step 1.1algebra∎

Its determinant is respectively d and 4d.

CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-10-01Open item page →

Rings of integers are Dedekind domains

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. The ring of integers of every number field is a Dedekind domain.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice and a number field K.

[F1]

The integers form a commutative ring with 1≠0 and no zero divisors, so they are an integral domain; the natural-number embedding into Z is injective and its image is the nonnegative integers (The integers form a commutative ring, The naturals embed in the integers, The integers have no zero divisors; multiplicative cancellation, Zero divisor, and integral domain: a commutative ring with 1≠0 and no zero divisors).

[F2]

Every additive subgroup of Z is nZ for a unique n∈N, with the generator positive when the subgroup is nonzero (Every subgroup of (Z,+) is ⟨n⟩=nZ for exactly one natural number n).

[F3]

A rational number integral over Z is an integer (The rational algebraic integers are exactly the integers).

[F4]
[F6]

Every algebraic extension of a perfect field is separable (Every algebraic extension of a perfect field is separable).

[F7]

A Dedekind domain is a Noetherian integrally closed domain of Krull dimension 1 (Dedekind domains).

[F8]

Assuming the Axiom of Choice, the integral closure of a Dedekind domain in a finite separable extension of its fraction field is Dedekind (The Axiom of Choice, The integral closure of a Dedekind domain in a finite separable extension is Dedekind).

[F9]

The ring of integers OK is the integral closure of Z in K (Ring of integers).

[F10]

The rationals are classes [(a,b)] with a,b∈Z and b≠0; the canonical map j:Z→Q is an injective ring map, Q is a field, and the fraction-field construction uses the localization relation u(ad−cb)=0 for some nonzero u∈Z (The rationals as equivalence classes of pairs of integers, The integers embed in the rationals, The rationals form a field, The field of fractions Frac⁡(D)=(D∖{0})−1D of an integral domain, Multiplicative subsets and the localisation S−1R as equivalence classes of fractions).

[F11]

A module is Noetherian when all its submodules are finitely generated, and a ring is Noetherian when its left regular module is Noetherian (Noetherian modules: every submodule is finitely generated, Left and right Noetherian rings).

[F12]

A domain is integrally closed when every element of its fraction field integral over it lies in the domain (Integral closure in an extension ring and integrally closed domains).

[F13]
[F14]

For a prime integer p, Z/p is a field and is the quotient ring Z/pZ; a quotient by an ideal is a field exactly when the ideal is maximal (For every prime p, the two operations on Z/p make it a field, For every n∈N, the congruence-class ring Z/n is the quotient ring Z/nZ, R/M is a field if and only if M is a maximal ideal).

[F16]

The natural embedding preserves order; the natural numerals satisfy 0<1<2, since 1=σ(0), 2=σ(1), and each successor is the immediate successor (The naturals embed in the integers, Discreteness: σ(n) is the immediate successor, The natural numbers N (von Neumann)).

[F17]

By definition, an integer p is prime exactly when p>1 and every positive divisor of p is 1 or p (Prime and composite integers: p is prime when p>1 and its only positive divisors are 1 and p).

[F18]

Every maximal ideal in a commutative ring is prime (Every maximal ideal of a commutative ring is prime).

[F19]

Krull dimension is the supremum of the lengths of strict chains of prime ideals (Krull dimension of a nonzero ring).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F10algebra

By [F1], Z is a domain. A fraction a/b equals c/d in Frac⁡(Z) exactly when u(ad−cb)=0 for some nonzero u∈Z; the domain property makes this equivalent to ad=cb, the relation defining Q. The operations agree under (a,b)↦j(a)/j(b), so this gives the canonical identification Frac⁡(Z)=Q.

1.2F2F11algebra

Let I be an ideal of Z. It is an additive subgroup, so [F2] gives I=nZ for some n∈N; as a Z-module, I is generated by that one element, including when n=0. Every submodule of the left regular module Z is such an ideal. Therefore this module is Noetherian, and Z is a Noetherian ring by [F11].

1.3F5F10algebra

The field Q has characteristic zero: for every positive integer m, m⋅1Q=j(m)≠0 by the injectivity in [F10]. By [F5], Q is perfect.

1.4F2F13given

Let P be a nonzero prime ideal of Z. By [F2], P=pZ for a positive integer p; since P is proper, p≠1, so p>1. If p∣ab, then ab∈P, and [F13] gives a∈P or b∈P, so p∣a or p∣b. The Euclid-property characterization therefore makes p a prime integer.

2.1F3step 1.1F12

If x∈Frac⁡(Z) is integral over Z, step 1.1 identifies it with a rational number, and [F3] gives x∈Z. Hence Z is integrally closed by [F12].

2.2F4F6step 1.3algebra

Put n=[K:Q], which is finite and at least 1 by [F4] and because K is a field extension of Q. For each α∈K, the n+1 vectors 1,α,…,αn in the n-dimensional Q-vector space K are linearly dependent, so a nonzero polynomial over Q vanishes at α. Thus K/Q is algebraic; [F6] and step 1.3 make it separable.

2.3step 1.4F14

For the prime p from step 1.4, [F14] makes Z/p a field and identifies it with the quotient ring Z/pZ=Z/P. The quotient criterion in [F14] then makes every nonzero prime ideal of Z maximal.

3.1F1F14F15F16F17F18F19step 2.3algebra

First, [F16] gives 0<1<2, so 2>1. If d is any positive divisor of 2, [F15] gives 1≤d≤∣2∣=2. If d≠1, then 1<d; translation compatibility of the order gives 0<d−1, and integer discreteness in [F15] gives 1≤d−1. Hence 2≤d, so antisymmetry and d≤2 give d=2. Thus the only positive divisors of 2 are 1 and 2, and [F17] proves that 2 is prime. Now [F14] makes 2Z maximal, and [F18] makes it prime. Since Z is a domain, (0) is prime; and 2≠0 by [F16], so (0)⊊2Z. Every prime chain with positive length starts at (0) and has length at most 1, because each nonzero prime is maximal by step 2.3. Thus [F19] gives dim⁡Z=1.

4.1F1F7step 1.2step 2.1step 3.1

Steps 1.1, 1.2, 2.1, and 3.1 show that Z is a Noetherian integrally closed domain of dimension 1. Hence [F7] makes Z a Dedekind domain.

5.1F8F9step 1.1step 2.2step 4.1given∎

By [F9], OK is the integral closure of Z in K. Apply [F8] with R=Z, fraction field Q=Frac⁡(Z) from step 1.1, and finite separable extension K/Q from step 2.2. Under the given Axiom of Choice, this proves that OK is Dedekind.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

None yet.

Sources